Hammond Nicole G, Semchishen Seana N, Geoffroy Marie-Claude, Sikora Lindsey, Wafy Gamal, Hsueh Lia, Khan Hassan, Edwards Jordan, Gravel Christopher, Ferro Mark A, Colman Ian
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Sep;12(9):660-672. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00217-2.
Family dynamics are implicated in self-harm and suicidality among children and adolescents. However, whether negative family dynamics confer a prospective risk and positive family dynamics confer a protective effect is not understood. To address this research gap, we aimed to summarise the prospective, longitudinal evidence examining the relationship between family dynamics, self-harm, and suicidality (ie, suicidal thoughts and behaviours) during childhood and adolescence.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and ERIC, as well as CINAHL, without language restrictions, from the date of database inception to May 20, 2025. Observational studies were eligible if they prospectively followed up a cohort of children and adolescents (age <20 years) from a general population, community, or school showing either no elevated risk or typical development of self-harm and suicidality for a minimum of 12 months. Eligible studies had to have included prospectively measured family dynamics, including positive (eg, emotionally supportive) and negative (eg, harsh, aversive, or punitive) parenting behaviours and family functioning (eg, family cohesion) or dysfunction (eg, discord or conflict) in childhood or adolescence. Extracted data consisted of study-level information and characteristics, participant characteristics, descriptions of study measures, and study results. Extracted data were entered into Covidence for consensus. The primary outcomes were self-harm (ie, thoughts of non-suicidal self-harm or self-injury, and non-suicidal self-harm or self-injury) and suicidality (ie, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt) over any reporting period. We examined individual and combined outcomes using a random-effects model. We assessed study quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023434804).
We screened 3860 articles and retained 38 studies, of which all 38 contributed to the narrative synthesis and 24 to the quantitative analyses. Altogether, the studies comprised 101 879 children and adolescents. Most study samples were from the USA (12 [32%]) or China (11 [29%]), with exposure and outcome ascertainment 12 months apart (25 [66%] studies) from age 10 years to 19 years (36 [95%]). Data stratified by sex, gender, race, or ethnicity were not consistently available. Female participants constituted a larger proportion of the samples than did male participants (ranges 42-100% vs 28-58%). Exposure to negative parenting was associated with an increased likelihood of combined self-harm and suicidal ideation (OR 1·29 [95% CI 1·15-1·46]) and non-suicidal self-harm or self-injury (1·46 [1·25-1·71]), but not suicidal ideation (1·07 [0·92-1·24]). Negative parenting practices and continuously measured self-harm and suicidality were not significantly associated. Positive parenting practices were not associated with suicidal ideation or with combined self-harm and suicidal ideation. Family dysfunction was longitudinally associated with an increased combined likelihood of self-harm and suicidality (OR 1·29 [95% CI 1·13-1·48]) and non-specific self-harm (1·70 [1·10-2·63]), but not suicide attempt (1·24 [0·93-1·66]). The overall rating of study quality was moderate (mean 6·5 of 10·0 stars [SD 1·29]).
Negative parenting practices and family dysfunction seem to precede self-harm and suicidality among children and adolescents. Reducing negative family dynamics could alleviate these severe mental health concerns in the short term and assisting families to minimise early-life exposure to these dynamics could prevent the onset of self-harm and suicidality.
Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Award Program and Canada Research Chairs Program.
家庭动态与儿童和青少年的自我伤害及自杀行为有关。然而,负面的家庭动态是否会带来前瞻性风险,以及正面的家庭动态是否具有保护作用,目前尚不清楚。为填补这一研究空白,我们旨在总结关于童年和青少年时期家庭动态、自我伤害和自杀行为(即自杀想法和行为)之间关系的前瞻性纵向证据。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和ERIC以及CINAHL,检索时间从数据库建立之日至2025年5月20日,无语言限制。观察性研究若前瞻性地随访了来自普通人群、社区或学校的儿童和青少年队列(年龄<20岁),且这些儿童和青少年自我伤害和自杀行为的风险未升高或发育正常,随访时间至少为12个月,则符合纳入标准。符合条件的研究必须前瞻性地测量了家庭动态,包括积极的(如情感支持)和消极的(如严厉、厌恶或惩罚性)养育行为以及家庭功能(如家庭凝聚力)或功能障碍(如不和或冲突),且这些测量是在童年或青少年时期进行的。提取的数据包括研究层面的信息和特征、参与者特征、研究测量的描述以及研究结果。提取的数据输入Covidence以达成共识。主要结局是在任何报告期内的自我伤害(即非自杀性自我伤害或自我伤害的想法,以及非自杀性自我伤害或自我伤害行为)和自杀行为(即自杀意念和自杀未遂)。我们使用随机效应模型检查个体和综合结局。我们使用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。本研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023434804)。
我们筛选了3860篇文章,保留了38项研究,其中所有38项研究都参与了叙述性综合分析,24项研究参与了定量分析。这些研究总共包括101879名儿童和青少年。大多数研究样本来自美国(12项[32%])或中国(11项[29%]),暴露和结局的确定时间间隔为12个月(25项[66%]研究),年龄范围为10岁至19岁(36项[95%])。按性别、种族或民族分层的数据并非始终可得。女性参与者在样本中所占比例高于男性参与者(范围为42%-100%对28%-58%)。暴露于消极养育与自我伤害和自杀意念综合发生的可能性增加相关(比值比1.29[95%置信区间1.15-1.46])以及非自杀性自我伤害或自我伤害行为(1.46[1.25-1.71]),但与自杀意念无关(1.07[0.92-1.24])。消极养育行为与持续测量的自我伤害和自杀行为无显著关联。积极养育行为与自杀意念或自我伤害和自杀意念综合发生情况无关。家庭功能障碍在纵向与自我伤害和自杀行为综合发生的可能性增加相关(比值比1.29[95%置信区间1.13-1.48])以及非特异性自我伤害(1.70[1.10-2.63]),但与自杀未遂无关(1.24[0.93-1.66])。研究质量的总体评分中等(平均6.5星,满分10.0星[标准差1.29])。
消极养育行为和家庭功能障碍似乎先于儿童和青少年的自我伤害和自杀行为出现。减少负面家庭动态在短期内可能缓解这些严重的心理健康问题,并且帮助家庭尽量减少早年暴露于这些动态环境中可能预防自我伤害和自杀行为的发生。
弗雷德里克·班廷和查尔斯·贝斯特加拿大研究生奖学金博士奖计划以及加拿大研究主席计划。