Hu Yong-Qing, Gao Ming, Ding Xin-Ru, Dai Wen-Cai, Zhao Huan, Zhang Ya-Rong, Zhou Liu-Yan, Guo Yu-Xi, Wang Zi-Fang
College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Aug 8;46(8):5369-5378. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406234.
Distillers' grains ash and biochar play a crucial role as ameliorants for improving the quality of acidic soils. To evaluate the impact of distillers' grains ash on the bacterial community structure in acidic purple soil, a field experiment was conducted with six treatments as follows: no fertilizer (CK), chemical fertilizer alone (F), lime + chemical fertilizer (LF), organic fertilizer + chemical fertilizer (OF), biochar + chemical fertilizer (BF), and distillers' grains ash + chemical fertilizer (JF). Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology was employed to analyze the effects of different treatments on the physicochemical properties, bacterial community diversity, community structure, and functional groups of the acidic purple soil. The results showed that, compared to the CK treatment, all ameliorant treatments significantly increased the pH, available nutrients, organic matter, and soluble carbon content of the acidic purple soil ( < 0.05). The effects of different treatments on the bacterial richness index (Chao1 index) of acidic purple soil were as follows: JF>OF>CK>F>BF>LF, while the bacterial diversity index (Shannon index) was: OF>CK>F>JF>BF>LF. Principal component analysis (PCA) and -diversity analysis indicated that different ameliorant treatments significantly altered the bacterial community structure of acidic purple soil ( = 0.001). Compared to CK, the ameliorant treatments effectively increased the number of specific ASVs in the soil bacteria, with the JF treatment showing the most significant increase of 50.7%. The dominant bacterial phyla in all treatments were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes, with the JF treatment effectively enriching functional bacterial groups beneficial for soil health and promoting crop growth, such as and . Mantel test, correlation heatmap, and redundancy analyses showed that soil organic matter, pH, and total organic carbon were the main environmental factors influencing the bacterial community structure, with soil pH having the most significant positive impact on bacterial community diversity. Overall, different soil ameliorants had varying mechanisms and effects on bacterial communities. The application of distiller's grains ash and biochar demonstrated superior effectiveness in improving the physicochemical properties of acidic purple soil and enhancing microbial activity, particularly increasing the abundance of Actinobacteria, making them excellent ameliorants for acidic soils.
酒糟灰和生物炭作为改良剂在改善酸性土壤质量方面发挥着关键作用。为了评估酒糟灰对酸性紫色土细菌群落结构的影响,进行了一项田间试验,设置了6种处理:不施肥(CK)、单施化肥(F)、石灰+化肥(LF)、有机肥+化肥(OF)、生物炭+化肥(BF)、酒糟灰+化肥(JF)。采用Illumina MiSeq高通量测序技术分析不同处理对酸性紫色土理化性质、细菌群落多样性、群落结构和功能群的影响。结果表明,与CK处理相比,所有改良剂处理均显著提高了酸性紫色土的pH值、有效养分、有机质和可溶性碳含量(P<0.05)。不同处理对酸性紫色土细菌丰富度指数(Chao1指数)的影响顺序为:JF>OF>CK>F>BF>LF,而细菌多样性指数(Shannon指数)为:OF>CK>F>JF>BF>LF。主成分分析(PCA)和α多样性分析表明,不同改良剂处理显著改变了酸性紫色土的细菌群落结构(P = 0.001)。与CK相比,改良剂处理有效增加了土壤细菌中特定ASV的数量,其中JF处理增加最为显著,增加了50.7%。所有处理中优势细菌门为放线菌门、变形菌门和厚壁菌门,JF处理有效富集了有利于土壤健康和促进作物生长的功能性细菌群,如 和 。Mantel检验、相关热图和冗余分析表明,土壤有机质、pH值和总有机碳是影响细菌群落结构的主要环境因素,其中土壤pH值对细菌群落多样性的正向影响最为显著。总体而言,不同土壤改良剂对细菌群落的作用机制和效果各不相同。酒糟灰和生物炭的施用在改善酸性紫色土理化性质和增强微生物活性方面表现出卓越成效,尤其增加了放线菌的丰度,使其成为酸性土壤的优良改良剂。