Suppr超能文献

主要在养老院执业的临床医生与阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者的护理质量

Clinicians Who Practice Primarily in Nursing Homes and the Quality of Care for Residents With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

作者信息

Yun Hyunkyung, Unruh Mark Aaron, Qian Yuting, Zhang Yongkang, Jung Hye-Young

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Joan and Sanford I. Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252465. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2465.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The number of physicians and advanced practitioners (APs) whose care is concentrated in nursing homes (often referred to as nursing home or skilled nursing facility specialists [SNFists]) has increased rapidly. Therefore, whether these clinicians provide better care is important.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between SNFist care and outcomes of long-stay nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective cohort study of 417 378 residents with ADRD in US NHs, claims for a 20% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed. Adjusted estimates were based on a machine learning approach that incorporated a doubly robust procedure using a generalized estimating equation with inverse probability treatment weighting. Three secondary analyses were conducted: (1) stratified analyses for physicians and APs, (2) inclusion of physicians of any specialty and APs, and (3) use of proxy outcomes for in-place deaths. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2024, to May 3, 2025.

INTERVENTION

Receipt of care from a SNFist; SNFists included generalist physicians and APs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care-sensitive (ACS) conditions. Death without an ACS hospitalization and death without any hospitalization were used in secondary analyses.

RESULTS

Of the total 417 378 residents, 242 540 received care from SNFists (mean [SD] age, 83.5 [8.7] years), and 174 838 never received care from SNFists (mean [SD] age, 84.8 [8.5] years). Compared with the residents who never received care from SNFists, the residents who received care from SNFists were more likely to be Black (12.6% vs 9.4%; P < .001), dually eligible (77.5% vs 73.1%; P < .001), and have more chronic conditions (eg, anemia, 60.9% vs 57.6%). Compared with non-SNFist clinicians, the SNFist clinicians were more likely to be female (physicians, 37.1% vs 23.3%; APs, 88.1% vs 85.1%), practice at more facilities (mean [SD] number of facilities, 9.4 [8.7] for SNFist physicians vs 6.4 [6.1] for non-SNFist physicians; 8.6 [8.1] for SNFist APs vs 7.1 [6.8] for non-SNFist APs), and less likely to practice in rural areas (physicians, 9.3% vs 25.4%; APs, 8.1% vs 20.2%). In adjusted analyses, receiving care from a SNFist vs non-SNFist was associated with 7% lower odds of an ACS hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96) and 7% lower odds of an ACS ED visit (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96). In stratified analyses, receiving care from a SNFist physician vs a non-SNFist physician was associated with 13% lower odds (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90) of an ACS hospitalization and 7% lowers odds of an ACS ED visit (OR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.88-0.97); comparisons of SNFist APs vs non-SNFist APs were not statistically significant. Estimates from the analysis including physicians of any specialty and APs were consistent with the primary results. SNFist care was associated with increased odds of in-place death.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Findings of this cohort study suggest that the use of SNFists by NHs may enhance the quality of care for residents with ADRD.

摘要

重要性

护理集中在养老院的内科医生和高级从业者(APs)(通常被称为养老院或专业护理机构专家[SNFists])数量迅速增加。因此,这些临床医生是否能提供更好的护理至关重要。

目的

研究SNFist护理与患有阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)的长期养老院(NH)居民的护理结果之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项对美国养老院中417378名患有ADRD的居民进行的回顾性队列研究中,分析了2013年至2019年20%的全国医疗保险按服务收费受益人的索赔数据。调整后的估计基于一种机器学习方法,该方法采用了双重稳健程序,使用带有逆概率治疗加权的广义估计方程。进行了三项次要分析:(1)对内科医生和APs的分层分析,(2)纳入任何专科的内科医生和APs,(3)使用就地死亡的替代结局。数据于2024年6月1日至2025年5月3日进行分析。

干预措施

接受SNFist的护理;SNFists包括全科医生和APs。

主要结局和衡量指标

因门诊护理敏感(ACS)疾病而住院和急诊就诊。在次要分析中使用无ACS住院死亡和无任何住院死亡情况。

结果

在总共417378名居民中,242540人接受了SNFists的护理(平均[标准差]年龄,83.5[8.7]岁),174838人从未接受过SNFists的护理(平均[标准差]年龄,84.8[8.5]岁)。与从未接受SNFists护理的居民相比,接受SNFists护理的居民更可能是黑人(12.6%对9.4%;P<0.001),双重资格(77.5%对73.1%;P<0.001),且患有更多慢性病(如贫血,60.9%对57.6%)。与非SNFist临床医生相比,SNFist临床医生更可能是女性(内科医生,37.1%对23.3%;APs,88.1%对85.1%),在更多机构执业(SNFist内科医生平均[标准差]机构数量,9.4[8.7]对非SNFist内科医生为6.4[6.1];SNFist APs为8.6[8.1]对非SNFist APs为7.1[6.8]),且在农村地区执业的可能性较小(内科医生,9.3%对25.4%;APs,8.1%对20.2%)。在调整分析中,接受SNFist护理与非SNFist护理相比,ACS住院几率降低7%(优势比[OR],0.93;95%置信区间,0.90 - 0.96),ACS急诊就诊几率降低7%(OR,0.93;95%置信区间,0.90 - 0.96)。在分层分析中,接受SNFist内科医生护理与非SNFist内科医生护理相比,ACS住院几率降低13%(OR,0.87;95%置信区间,0.83 - 0.90),ACS急诊就诊几率降低7%(OR,0.93,95%置信区间,0.88 - 0.97);SNFist APs与非SNFist APs的比较无统计学意义。包括任何专科内科医生和APs的分析估计与主要结果一致。SNFist护理与就地死亡几率增加相关。

结论与意义

这项队列研究的结果表明,养老院使用SNFists可能提高ADRD居民的护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/720d/12357189/51a61e563af2/jamahealthforum-e252465-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验