Sealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA; Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2534-2539.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
The objective was to describe the growth of physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) who practice full time in nursing homes, to assess resident and nursing home characteristics associated with receiving care from full-time providers, and describe variation among nursing homes in use of full-time providers.
Retrospective cohort study.
A 20% national sample Medicare data on long-term care residents in 2008 to 2018 and the physicians, NPs, and PAs who submitted charges to Medicare for their care.
We measured the percentage of provider charges for services rendered in nursing homes, in addition to resident and facility characteristics.
Full-time nursing home providers increased from 26.0% of all nursing home providers in 2008 to 44.6% in 2017. The largest increase was in NPs: from 1986 in 2008 to 4479 in 2017. Resident age, sex, Medicaid eligibility, and race/ethnicity had minimal association with the odds of having a full-time provider, whereas residents with an NP primary care provider were 23.0 times more likely (95% confidence interval = 21.6, 24.6) to have a full-time provider. Residents who received care from both a physician and an NP or PA increased from 33.6% in 2008 to 62.5% in 2018. There was large variation among facilities in the percentage of residents with full-time providers, from 5.72% of residents with full-time providers in the bottom quintile of facilities to 91.44% in the top quintile. Individual nursing homes accounted for 59% of the variation in whether a resident had a full-time provider.
The percentage of nursing home residents with full-time providers continues to grow, with very large variation among nursing homes.
本研究旨在描述全职在养老院执业的医生、护士从业者(NPs)和医师助理(PAs)的增长情况,评估与接受全职提供者护理相关的居民和养老院特征,并描述养老院全职提供者使用情况的差异。
回顾性队列研究。
对 2008 年至 2018 年医疗保险长期护理居民的全国 20%抽样数据以及为其护理向医疗保险提交费用的医生、NPs 和 PAs。
我们测量了在养老院提供服务的提供者收费中全职提供者的比例,以及居民和设施特征。
全职养老院提供者从 2008 年所有养老院提供者的 26.0%增加到 2017 年的 44.6%。增幅最大的是 NPs:从 2008 年的 1986 人增加到 2017 年的 4479 人。居民年龄、性别、医疗补助资格和种族/民族与获得全职提供者的几率几乎没有关联,而有 NP 初级保健提供者的居民获得全职提供者的几率高 23.0 倍(95%置信区间为 21.6,24.6)。2008 年有医生和 NP 或 PA 联合护理的居民比例从 33.6%增加到 2018 年的 62.5%。在设施中,有全职提供者的居民比例差异很大,从设施排名后五分之一的居民中 5.72%有全职提供者到排名前五分之一的居民中 91.44%有全职提供者。个别养老院在居民是否有全职提供者方面占 59%的差异。
全职养老院提供者的比例继续增长,养老院之间差异非常大。