Hammond M
S Afr Med J. 1985 Dec 21;68(13):961-2.
One year after marker A had marked a series of short-answer questions, marker B re-marked them using the same mark schedule. In only 26 out of 160 cases (16%) did the two markers agree on the final mark. When these 26 papers were analysed in more detail, it was found that the markers agreed on the mark allocation for each question in only 12 cases. The mean marks allocated by the markers were statistically significantly different, and their disagreement affected students even at the extremes of the class where decisions about 'first-class passes' and failures are made.
在评分员A对一系列简答题进行评分一年后,评分员B使用相同的评分标准对这些题目进行重新评分。在160个案例中,只有26个案例(16%)两位评分员在最终分数上达成一致。当对这26份试卷进行更详细的分析时,发现评分员仅在12个案例中对每个问题的分数分配达成一致。评分员给出的平均分数在统计学上有显著差异,而且他们的分歧甚至影响到了班级两端的学生,在这两端会决定“一等通过”和不及格情况。