Suppr超能文献

某医学院不同多项选择题评分系统的评估。

Evaluation of different MCQ-scoring-system in a medical school.

作者信息

Ahmed M E, Michail M

机构信息

Sinnar Hospital, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

出版信息

East Afr Med J. 1993 Dec;70(12):787-8.

PMID:8026353
Abstract

The MCQ scores of final medical students in surgery for the years 1990 and 1991 were analysed. The score for a correct answer was plus 1 mark in both years. The penalty for incorrect answer for the year 1990 was minus-1 mark as had been practiced during the previous 15 years. The penalty for the year 1991 was minus 1/4 for an incorrect answer. This low penalty of minus 1/4 resulted in an inflated MCQ score as compared with the essay questions and both clinical and oral examination results. The low score recorded during the year 1990 is a genuine reflection of inadequate performance rather than bad evaluation since the MCQ bank is the same and the panel of examiners has not changed. It is concluded that minus 1 mark penalty has many advantages and therefore should be the practice.

摘要

对1990年和1991年最后一年医学生外科多选题考试成绩进行了分析。这两年中,答对一题得1分。1990年答错一题扣1分,这是过去15年一直实行的扣分标准。1991年答错一题扣1/4分。与论述题以及临床和口试成绩相比,这种低至扣1/4分的扣分标准导致多选题成绩虚高。1990年记录的低分是学生表现不佳的真实反映,而非评估不当,因为题库相同且考官小组未变。得出的结论是,扣1分的扣分标准有诸多优点,因此应予以采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验