Xie Zeyu, Liang Zhuoru, Xie Yilin, Zheng Guimei, Cao Weiling
Department of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Aug 12;18:2837-2849. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S537229. eCollection 2025.
Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist, shows promise for weight loss, but its safety compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists requires (liraglutide, semaglutide) clarification for clinical decision-making. This systematic review evaluates their safety profiles in patients with obesity or overweight.
We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42024576314) of RCTs from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane (inception to August 20, 2024). Adults with BMI ≥27 kg/m² (≥25 kg/m² for Asians) receiving GLP-1/GIP dual agonists (tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide 2.4 mg and liraglutide 3.0 mg) were included. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted by using odds ratios with 95% CIs. Primary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. NMA was performed using Stata 16.1.
This network meta-analysis included 19 randomized controlled trials (13,529 participants). Liraglutide 3.0 mg significantly increased the incidence of any adverse events (OR = 1.53-2.00) compared to semaglutide and tirzepatide, while tirzepatide showed a higher severe hypoglycemia risk (<54 mg/dL). Notably, GLP-1/GIP dual agonists demonstrated superior safety profiles in neoplasms (vs liraglutide: OR = 5.15 [1.28-20.74]; vs semaglutide: OR = 3.55 [1.10-11.54]) and respiratory infections/nasopharyngitis, suggesting enhanced anti-inflammatory effects. GLP-1 agonists had fewer diarrhea and injection-site reactions but higher abdominal pain/dyspepsia rates. Subgroup analyses further revealed that non-T2DM patients had a significantly higher incidence of adverse events compared to T2DM patients (P < 0.05), while no significant associations were observed with race, BMI, or treatment duration. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness and funnel plots indicated no publication bias.
Liraglutide 3.0 mg was associated with higher overall adverse events, while tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg) showed increased severe hypoglycemia and injection-site reactions risk but superior anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplasm effects compared to GLP-1 mono-agonists. These findings highlight therapy-specific safety patterns critical for personalized treatment selection.
替尔泊肽是一种GLP-1/GIP双重激动剂,在减肥方面显示出前景,但与GLP-1受体激动剂相比,其安全性(利拉鲁肽、司美格鲁肽)需要明确以用于临床决策。本系统评价评估了它们在肥胖或超重患者中的安全性。
我们对来自PubMed、Embase和Cochrane(从创刊到2024年8月20日)的随机对照试验进行了一项符合PRISMA的系统评价(PROSPERO:CRD42024576314)。纳入了体重指数(BMI)≥27 kg/m²(亚洲人为≥25 kg/m²)且接受GLP-1/GIP双重激动剂(替尔泊肽10或15 mg)和GLP-1受体激动剂(司美格鲁肽2.4 mg和利拉鲁肽3.0 mg)的成年人。使用比值比及95%置信区间进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)。主要结局为不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件。使用Stata 16.1进行NMA。
该网络荟萃分析纳入了19项随机对照试验(13529名参与者)。与司美格鲁肽和替尔泊肽相比,3.0 mg利拉鲁肽显著增加了任何不良事件的发生率(比值比=1.53 - 2.00),而替尔泊肽显示出更高的严重低血糖风险(<54 mg/dL)。值得注意的是,GLP-1/GIP双重激动剂在肿瘤方面表现出更好的安全性(与利拉鲁肽相比:比值比=5.15 [1.28 - 20.74];与司美格鲁肽相比:比值比=3.55 [1.10 - 11.54])以及在呼吸道感染/鼻咽炎方面,提示具有更强的抗炎作用。GLP-1激动剂的腹泻和注射部位反应较少,但腹痛/消化不良发生率较高。亚组分析进一步显示,非2型糖尿病患者的不良事件发生率显著高于2型糖尿病患者(P < 0.05),而未观察到与种族、BMI或治疗持续时间有显著关联。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性,漏斗图表明无发表偏倚。
3.0 mg利拉鲁肽与更高的总体不良事件相关,而替尔泊肽(10或15 mg)显示出严重低血糖和注射部位反应风险增加,但与GLP-1单激动剂相比具有更好的抗炎和抗肿瘤作用。这些发现突出了特定治疗的安全模式对个性化治疗选择至关重要。