Karimli Leyla, Nabayinda Josephine, Nartey Portia B, Ssewamala Fred M
Los Angeles (UCLA), Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, 337 Charles E Young Dr E, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
International Center for Child Health and Development (ICHAD), University of Washington, Saint Louis, Brown School of Social Work, 1 Brookings Dr, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
J Child Fam Stud. 2024 Oct;33(10):3104-3118. doi: 10.1007/s10826-024-02920-0. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
The study tests the effect of poverty-reduction intervention on family functioning reported by AIDS-orphaned children in extended families in Southern Uganda by asking two questions: (1) based on children's reports, how does poverty reduction intervention affect family functioning? and (2) to what extent do these effects vary by a child's gender and orphanhood status? Informed by the social causation theory, family stress model, and asset theory, the study aims to address the existing knowledge gap on effects of poverty reduction interventions on family functioning in low-income families caring for AIDS orphaned children in Uganda. We ran multilevel regression models using longitudinal data collected in a cluster-randomized controlled trial from N = 1410 children (n = 621 boys and n = 789 girls) recruited from 48 rural primary schools in Uganda. Survey data was collected every 12 months over the course of 5 years. The average age of children at enrollment was 13 years. We found significant positive effects of the intervention on family cohesion, family communication, and child-caregiver relationship. Effects vary by child's gender and orphanhood category. Intervention improves family communication for boys, while improving family cohesion and quality of child-caregiver relationship for girls. Single maternal orphans reported improved family communication, while single paternal orphans reported improved child-caregiver relationship. Poverty reduction interventions are important to improve family functioning for low-income families. Variations by child's gender and orphanhood status have not been reported in previous studies, and our findings underscore the importance of continued research in this area.
(1)根据儿童的报告,减贫干预如何影响家庭功能?(2)这些影响在多大程度上因儿童的性别和孤儿身份而异?基于社会因果理论、家庭压力模型和资产理论,该研究旨在解决关于减贫干预对乌干达照顾艾滋病孤儿的低收入家庭的家庭功能影响的现有知识空白。我们使用在一项整群随机对照试验中收集的纵向数据运行了多层次回归模型,这些数据来自乌干达48所农村小学招募的N = 1410名儿童(n = 621名男孩和n = 789名女孩)。在5年的时间里,每12个月收集一次调查数据。入学时儿童的平均年龄为13岁。我们发现干预对家庭凝聚力、家庭沟通和儿童与照顾者关系有显著的积极影响。影响因儿童的性别和孤儿类别而异。干预改善了男孩的家庭沟通,同时改善了女孩的家庭凝聚力和儿童与照顾者关系的质量。单亲母亲孤儿报告家庭沟通有所改善,而单亲父亲孤儿报告儿童与照顾者关系有所改善。减贫干预对于改善低收入家庭的家庭功能很重要。以前的研究没有报告过因儿童性别和孤儿身份而产生的差异,我们的研究结果强调了在这一领域继续开展研究的重要性。