University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Luskin School of Public Affairs, Social Welfare Department, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Sep;332:116102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116102. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
Reviews that synthesize global evidence on the impact of poverty reduction interventions on child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) report inconclusive results and highlight the need to unpack the mechanisms that connect poverty-reduction to CAMH. To address this gap, we examine the proposition that family relations is an important relational factor transmitting effect of poverty on CAMH, and test whether family relations mediate the effect of poverty-reduction intervention on depression, hopelessness, and self-concept among AIDS orphans in Uganda. We use longitudinal data collected over the course of 48 months in a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted among N = 1410 AIDS orphans from n = 48 schools in Uganda. To examine the relationship between intervention, latent mediator (family relations and support) and CAMH outcomes (Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS), and Depression), we ran structural equation models adjusting for clustering of individuals within schools. Relative to the control group, participants in both treatment arms reported lower levels of hopelessness and depression, and significantly higher levels of self-concept. They also report significantly higher levels of latent family relationship in all three models. In both treatment arms, the direct effect of the intervention on all three outcomes is still significant when the latent family relations mediator is included in the analyses. This suggests partial mediation. In other words, in both treatment arms, the significant positive effect of the intervention on children's depression, hopelessness, and self-concept is partially mediated by their family relationship quality. Our findings support the argument put forward by the Family Stress Model showing that the poverty-reduction program improves children's mental health functioning by improving family relationships. The implications of our study extend beyond the narrow focus of poverty reduction, suggesting that asset-building interventions have broader impacts on family dynamics and child mental health.
综述综合了全球关于减贫干预对儿童和青少年心理健康(CAMH)影响的证据,报告结果不一致,并强调需要阐明将减贫与 CAMH 联系起来的机制。为了解决这一差距,我们研究了家庭关系是传递贫困对 CAMH 影响的重要关系因素这一命题,并检验了家庭关系是否在减贫干预对乌干达艾滋病孤儿的抑郁、绝望和自我概念的影响中起中介作用。我们使用在乌干达 n=48 所学校的 48 个月的纵向数据,在一项针对 1410 名艾滋病孤儿的整群随机对照试验中进行了分析。为了检验干预、潜在中介变量(家庭关系和支持)与 CAMH 结果(贝克绝望量表(BHS)、田纳西自我概念量表(TSCS)和抑郁)之间的关系,我们运行了结构方程模型,调整了个体在校内的聚类。与对照组相比,两个治疗组的参与者报告的绝望和抑郁水平较低,自我概念水平显著较高。他们还报告了所有三个模型中潜在家庭关系的水平显著提高。在两个治疗组中,当分析中包含潜在的家庭关系中介变量时,干预对所有三个结果的直接影响仍然显著。这表明存在部分中介作用。换句话说,在两个治疗组中,干预对儿童抑郁、绝望和自我概念的显著积极影响部分是通过他们的家庭关系质量来介导的。我们的研究结果支持家庭压力模型提出的观点,即减贫计划通过改善家庭关系来改善儿童的心理健康功能。我们研究的意义超出了减贫的狭隘范围,表明资产建设干预对家庭动态和儿童心理健康有更广泛的影响。