Suppr超能文献

种植体角度和印模技术对诺贝尔活性种植体印模的影响:一项原创研究。

Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on Nobel active implant impressions: An original study.

作者信息

G S Prasanthi, Sushma Uppala, Jyothi Tikkisetty Chaitanya, Vellanki Varchaswi, Manaswi Raguri, Agrawal Neha

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkelapadu, Guntur andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkelapadu, Guntur andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1191-1194. doi: 10.6026/973206300211191. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Accurate implant impressions are essential for the success and longevity of implant-supported prostheses. The Nobel Active system has a tapered body and aggressive thread design, demanding high precision. Therefore, it is of interest to compare open-tray and closed-tray techniques for impression accuracy. Implants were placed at 0°, 15°, and 25° angulations for evaluation. A Coordinate Measuring Machine was used for 3D deviation measurements. At 0°, both techniques showed negligible differences in accuracy. At 15° and 25°, the open-tray technique had significantly better accuracy (p < 0.05). Impression errors increased with implant angulation, mainly in closed-tray groups. Angulated implants posed greater challenges for accurate impressions. Thus, we show the role of angulation in impression precision. Open-tray techniques are preferred in angulated Nobel Active implant cases. This approach enhances prosthetic fit and improves clinical outcomes.

摘要

精确的种植体印模对于种植体支持的修复体的成功和长期使用至关重要。Nobel Active系统具有锥形主体和强力螺纹设计,对精度要求很高。因此,比较开放托盘和封闭托盘技术的印模准确性很有意义。将种植体以0°、15°和25°的角度植入进行评估。使用坐标测量机进行三维偏差测量。在0°时,两种技术在准确性上的差异可忽略不计。在15°和25°时,开放托盘技术的准确性明显更高(p < 0.05)。印模误差随着种植体角度的增加而增加,主要出现在封闭托盘组中。成角度的种植体对精确印模提出了更大的挑战。因此,我们展示了角度在印模精度中的作用。在有角度的Nobel Active种植体病例中,开放托盘技术更受青睐。这种方法可提高修复体的贴合度并改善临床效果。

相似文献

1
Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on Nobel active implant impressions: An original study.
Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1191-1194. doi: 10.6026/973206300211191. eCollection 2025.
2
Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):836-45. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3625.
3
Accuracy of tooth-implant impressions: Comparison of five different techniques.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Jun;9(3):526-534. doi: 10.1002/cre2.737. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec 12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.015.
6
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
7
The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5.

本文引用的文献

5
A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant master casts fabricated from two different transfer impression techniques.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):142-8. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.178747.
7
The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5.
8
Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6):349-56. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7.
9
Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):536-42.
10
Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar;83(3):323-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70136-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验