Yi Jixing, Wu Min, Wei Suzhen, Huang Qiliang, Liang Bumin, Peng Peng, Li Tao, Xu Fengming
Department of Radiology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 31;12:1608870. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1608870. eCollection 2025.
To investigate the difference of black blood (DB) and bright blood (BB) T2* techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T in the assessment of myocardial iron load in patients with thalassemia (TM).
As a retrospective study. CMRtools software was used to measure myocardial T2* in 359 patients with moderate (60 g/L < Hemoglobin<90 g/L) or severe (Hemoglobin<60 g/L) thalassemia. A truncation method was used to remove signal values that deviated from the fitted curve. T2* (DBx-T2*, BBx-T2*) containing all (eight echoes) signals (DB8-T2*, BB8-T2*) and the optimal signal (coefficient of determination > 0.95) were recorded. The difference, correlation and consistency of T2* measured by different methods were compared.
There was no significant difference ( > 0.05) in myocardial T2* measured by different methods (1.5 T, 3 T), and all of them were highly positively correlated ( < 0.05, r > 0.9). Bland-Altman analysis showed that (1.5 T) DB8-T2* and DBx-T2*, DBx-T2* and BBx-T2* had good consistency ( > 0.05). (3 T) DB8-T2* and DBx-T2* had good consistency ( > 0.05). There were proportional differences in T2* values measured by the other methods ( < 0.05), and none of them could be considered to have good consistency.
DB CMR T2* and BB CMR T2* can be interchangeable in the assessment of myocardial iron load in TM patients. However, DB CMR T2* is more stable and reliable.
探讨1.5T和3T场强下黑血(DB)和亮血(BB)T2*技术在评估地中海贫血(TM)患者心肌铁负荷中的差异。
一项回顾性研究。使用CMRtools软件测量359例中度(60g/L<血红蛋白<90g/L)或重度(血红蛋白<60g/L)地中海贫血患者的心肌T2*。采用截断方法去除偏离拟合曲线的信号值。记录包含所有(八个回波)信号的T2*(DBx-T2*,BBx-T2*)(DB8-T2*,BB8-T2*)以及最佳信号(决定系数>0.95)。比较不同方法测量的T2*的差异、相关性和一致性。
不同方法(1.5T,3T)测量的心肌T2无显著差异(>0.05),且均呈高度正相关(<0.05,r>0.9)。Bland-Altman分析显示,(1.5T)DB8-T2与DBx-T2*、DBx-T2与BBx-T2具有良好的一致性(>0.05)。(3T)DB8-T2与DBx-T2具有良好的一致性(>0.05)。其他方法测量的T2*值存在比例差异(<0.05),且均不能认为具有良好的一致性。
在评估TM患者心肌铁负荷时,DB CMR T2和BB CMR T2可相互替代。然而,DB CMR T2*更稳定可靠。