Suppr超能文献

依拉环素:药敏试验方法评估及对多重耐药肠杆菌科细菌和不动杆菌的活性

Eravacycline: evaluation of susceptibility testing methods and activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter.

作者信息

Kinet-Poleur Amélie, Bogaerts Pierre, Montesinos Isabel, Huang Te-Din

机构信息

Laboratory Medicine - Microbiology, CHU UCL Namur site Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05235-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Eravacycline is a tetracycline approved for treating intra-abdominal infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Our study aims to compare two methods for determining eravacycline MIC against Gram-negatives and to evaluate its in vitro activity compared with various antibiotics, particularly last-line agents.

METHODS

We performed susceptibility testing of eravacycline against 275 consecutive MDR Gram-negative clinical isolates collected by the Belgian NRC. The tested strains include Enterobacterales (n = 222) and Acinetobacter (n = 53) species, mostly carbapenemase producers. We used consecutively 111 of these strains to perform method comparison. ERV MICs were determined by broth microdilution (BMD) using Sensititre customized panel (ThermoFisher) and by gradient diffusion strip method (Etest Biomérieux).

RESULTS

According to the BMD method, 83.3% of Enterobacterales were eravacycline susceptible (using EUCAST 2024 breakpoints for E. coli and FDA breakpoints) and 56.6% of Acinetobacter spp. below the ECOFF. For Enterobacterales, the CA, VMD, MD and EA were 98.4%, 1.64%, 0% and 100% respectively. For A. baumannii, we obtained 90% of CA, 88% of EA, 0% of VMD and 10% of MD. For Enterobacterales, eravacycline and tigecycline exhibited a MIC50 of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/L respectively. Colistin displayed a MIC50 of 0.5 mg/L while cefiderocol showed a MIC50 of 0.5 mg/L. 83.3%, 78.4%, 92.8% and 89.4% of Enterobacterales were eravacycline, tigecycline, colistin and cefiderocol susceptible respectively. For Acinetobacter spp., MIC50 was 0.25 mg/L for eravacycline; 0.5 mg/L for tigecycline; 1 mg/L for colistin and 0.25 mg/L for cefiderocol. 56.6%, 47.2%, 92.5% and 72.7% of Acinetobacter spp. were eravacycline, tigecycline, colistin and cefiderocol susceptible respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gradient diffusion strip method provides accurate and reproductible eravacycline susceptibility results overall. Eravacycline may be an interesting therapeutical option against MDR Enterobacterales, with activity rate relatively similar to tigecycline and cefiderocol. Against MDR Acinetobacter spp., eravacycline displayed only moderate activity, despite one dilution lower MIC50 than tigecycline.

摘要

目的

依拉环素是一种被批准用于治疗由多重耐药(MDR)细菌引起的腹腔内感染的四环素类药物。我们的研究旨在比较两种测定依拉环素对革兰氏阴性菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的方法,并评估其与各种抗生素,特别是最后一线药物相比的体外活性。

方法

我们对由比利时国家参考中心收集的275株连续的MDR革兰氏阴性临床分离株进行了依拉环素的药敏试验。受试菌株包括肠杆菌科(n = 222)和不动杆菌属(n = 53)菌种,大多为碳青霉烯酶产生菌。我们连续使用其中111株菌株进行方法比较。通过使用Sensititre定制平板(赛默飞世尔)的肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)和梯度扩散条法(Etest生物梅里埃)测定依拉环素的MIC。

结果

根据BMD方法,83.3%的肠杆菌科细菌对依拉环素敏感(使用欧盟CAST 2024对大肠杆菌的断点和美国食品药品监督管理局的断点),56.6%的不动杆菌属菌种低于生态学临界值(ECOFF)。对于肠杆菌科细菌,一致性(CA)、非常重大偏差(VMD)、重大偏差(MD)和基本一致(EA)分别为98.4%、1.64%、0%和100%。对于鲍曼不动杆菌,我们得到的CA为90%,EA为88%,VMD为0%,MD为10%。对于肠杆菌科细菌,依拉环素和替加环素的MIC50分别为0.25和0.5mg/L。黏菌素的MIC50为0.5mg/L,而头孢地尔的MIC50为0.5mg/L。分别有83.3%、78.4%、92.8%和89.4%的肠杆菌科细菌对依拉环素、替加环素、黏菌素和头孢地尔敏感。对于不动杆菌属菌种,依拉环素的MIC50为0.25mg/L;替加环素为0.5mg/L;黏菌素为1mg/L;头孢地尔为0.25mg/L。分别有56.6%、47.2%、92.5%和72.7%的不动杆菌属菌种对依拉环素、替加环素、黏菌素和头孢地尔敏感。

结论

梯度扩散条法总体上提供了准确且可重复的依拉环素药敏结果。依拉环素可能是针对MDR肠杆菌科细菌的一个有吸引力的治疗选择,其活性率与替加环素和头孢地尔相对相似。对于MDR不动杆菌属菌种,尽管依拉环素的MIC50比替加环素低一个稀释度,但它仅显示出中等活性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验