• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理肿瘤学研究中患者报告结局和照顾者报告结局的教育目标

Educational Targets for Patient-Reported Outcomes and Caregiver-Reported Outcomes in Psycho-oncology Research.

作者信息

Jones Salene M W, Kent Erin E, Caru Maxime, Arem Hannah, Kim Youngmee, Song Lixin, Langer Shelby L

机构信息

Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02709-9.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-025-02709-9
PMID:40824476
Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and caregiver-reported outcomes (CROs) are tools for evaluating behavioral medicine interventions and for bringing the patient voice into observational research. This study aimed to identify barriers to using PROs/CROs in behavioral cancer research and to equitably address those barriers. Forty-nine members of a cancer special interest group from a research society completed surveys in early 2023 about needs related to the use of PROs and CROs. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results. Most participants used PROs (n = 34, 69%) but few frequently used CROs (n = 12, 24%). More than 80% of the sample were familiar with common PRO/CRO properties such as reliability and validity. Participants reported considering a wide variety of population characteristics when using PROs and CROs, including language (n = 31, 70%) and education level (n = 31, 70%). The most common barriers to using PROs/CROs in research were time, funding, and technology with many reflecting potential reasons for inequitable representation of certain groups in research. Webinars were the most preferred educational format (n = 38, 78%) for resources related to PROs/CROs. Many participants encountered barriers to using PROs in research. Creation and dissemination of educational resources to promote equitable use of PROs/CROs across underrepresented groups and overcome common barriers to use of these measurement tools are warranted.

摘要

患者报告结局(PROs)和照护者报告结局(CROs)是用于评估行为医学干预措施以及将患者声音纳入观察性研究的工具。本研究旨在确定在行为癌症研究中使用PROs/CROs的障碍,并公平地解决这些障碍。一个研究协会的癌症特别兴趣小组的49名成员在2023年初完成了关于使用PROs和CROs相关需求的调查。采用描述性统计来总结结果。大多数参与者使用PROs(n = 34,69%),但很少有人经常使用CROs(n = 12,24%)。超过80%的样本熟悉常见的PRO/CRO属性,如信度和效度。参与者报告在使用PROs和CROs时会考虑各种各样的人群特征,包括语言(n = 31,70%)和教育水平(n = 31,70%)。在研究中使用PROs/CROs最常见的障碍是时间、资金和技术,许多障碍反映了某些群体在研究中代表性不平等的潜在原因。网络研讨会是与PROs/CROs相关资源最受欢迎的教育形式(n = 38,78%)。许多参与者在研究中使用PROs时遇到了障碍。有必要创建和传播教育资源,以促进在代表性不足的群体中公平使用PROs/CROs,并克服使用这些测量工具的常见障碍。

相似文献

1
Educational Targets for Patient-Reported Outcomes and Caregiver-Reported Outcomes in Psycho-oncology Research.心理肿瘤学研究中患者报告结局和照顾者报告结局的教育目标
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02709-9.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
7
The agreement of phonetic transcriptions between paediatric speech and language therapists transcribing a disordered speech sample.儿科言语和语言治疗师转写语音样本的音标转录的一致性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13043. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
A systematic review to examine the impact of psycho-educational interventions on health outcomes and costs in adults and children with difficult asthma.一项系统性综述,旨在研究心理教育干预对患有难治性哮喘的成人和儿童的健康结局及成本的影响。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jun;9(23):iii-iv, 1-167. doi: 10.3310/hta9230.
10
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychometric and pragmatic evidence rating scale (PAPERS) for measure development and evaluation.用于测量工具开发与评估的心理测量和实用证据评级量表(PAPERS)。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Aug 10;2:26334895211037391. doi: 10.1177/26334895211037391. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any Treatment.运用基于测量的护理来强化任何治疗。
Cogn Behav Pract. 2015 Feb;22(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.01.010.
3
Patient reported outcome measures in practice.实践中的患者报告结局指标
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7818.