Lewis Cara C, Mettert Kayne D, Stanick Cameo F, Halko Heather M, Nolen Elspeth A, Powell Byron J, Weiner Bryan J
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, USA.
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Aug 10;2:26334895211037391. doi: 10.1177/26334895211037391. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
To rigorously measure the implementation of evidence-based interventions, implementation science requires measures that have evidence of reliability and validity across different contexts and populations. Measures that can detect change over time and impact on outcomes of interest are most useful to implementers. Moreover, measures that fit the practical needs of implementers could be used to guide implementation outside of the research context. To address this need, our team developed a rating scale for implementation science measures that considers their psychometric and pragmatic properties and the evidence available. The Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS) can be used in systematic reviews of measures, in measure development, and to select measures. PAPERS may move the field toward measures that inform robust research evaluations and practical implementation efforts.
为了严格衡量基于证据的干预措施的实施情况，实施科学需要在不同背景和人群中具备可靠性和有效性证据的测量方法。能够检测随时间变化以及对感兴趣的结果产生影响的测量方法对实施者最为有用。此外，符合实施者实际需求的测量方法可用于指导研究背景之外的实施工作。为满足这一需求，我们的团队开发了一种用于实施科学测量方法的评级量表，该量表考虑了测量方法的心理测量学和实用性属性以及现有证据。心理测量学和实用性证据评级量表（PAPERS）可用于测量方法的系统评价、测量方法的开发以及测量方法的选择。PAPERS可能会推动该领域朝着有助于进行有力研究评估和实际实施工作的测量方法发展。
