用于测量工具开发与评估的心理测量和实用证据评级量表（PAPERS）。
The psychometric and pragmatic evidence rating scale (PAPERS) for measure development and evaluation.
作者信息
Lewis Cara C, Mettert Kayne D, Stanick Cameo F, Halko Heather M, Nolen Elspeth A, Powell Byron J, Weiner Bryan J
机构信息
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, USA.
出版信息
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Aug 10;2:26334895211037391. doi: 10.1177/26334895211037391. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Abstract
To rigorously measure the implementation of evidence-based interventions, implementation science requires measures that have evidence of reliability and validity across different contexts and populations. Measures that can detect change over time and impact on outcomes of interest are most useful to implementers. Moreover, measures that fit the practical needs of implementers could be used to guide implementation outside of the research context. To address this need, our team developed a rating scale for implementation science measures that considers their psychometric and pragmatic properties and the evidence available. The Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS) can be used in systematic reviews of measures, in measure development, and to select measures. PAPERS may move the field toward measures that inform robust research evaluations and practical implementation efforts.
摘要
为了严格衡量基于证据的干预措施的实施情况，实施科学需要在不同背景和人群中具备可靠性和有效性证据的测量方法。能够检测随时间变化以及对感兴趣的结果产生影响的测量方法对实施者最为有用。此外，符合实施者实际需求的测量方法可用于指导研究背景之外的实施工作。为满足这一需求，我们的团队开发了一种用于实施科学测量方法的评级量表，该量表考虑了测量方法的心理测量学和实用性属性以及现有证据。心理测量学和实用性证据评级量表（PAPERS）可用于测量方法的系统评价、测量方法的开发以及测量方法的选择。PAPERS可能会推动该领域朝着有助于进行有力研究评估和实际实施工作的测量方法发展。
相似文献
1
The psychometric and pragmatic evidence rating scale (PAPERS) for measure development and evaluation.用于测量工具开发与评估的心理测量和实用证据评级量表（PAPERS）。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Aug 10;2:26334895211037391. doi: 10.1177/26334895211037391. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Measuring readiness for implementation: A systematic review of measures' psychometric and pragmatic properties.衡量实施准备情况：对测量方法的心理测量学和实用特性的系统评价。
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Aug 26;1:2633489520933896. doi: 10.1177/2633489520933896. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
3
Pragmatic measures for implementation research: development of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS).实用主义实施研究措施：心理测量和实用证据评级量表（PAPERS）的制定。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):11-20. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz164.
4
Measures of organizational culture, organizational climate, and implementation climate in behavioral health: A systematic review.行为健康领域中组织文化、组织氛围及实施氛围的衡量：一项系统综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Jun 21;2:26334895211018862. doi: 10.1177/26334895211018862. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Defining, conceptualizing and evaluating pragmatic qualities of quantitative instruments measuring implementation determinants and outcomes: a scoping and critical review of the literature and recommendations for future research.定义、概念化和评估定量工具测量实施决定因素和结果的实用品质：文献综述和未来研究建议的范围界定和批判性评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1049-1064. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac064.
6
Measuring implementation outcomes: An updated systematic review of measures' psychometric properties.衡量实施成果：对测量方法心理测量特性的最新系统评价。
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Aug 28;1:2633489520936644. doi: 10.1177/2633489520936644. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Determining the influence of intervention characteristics on implementation success requires reliable and valid measures: Results from a systematic review.确定干预特征对实施成功的影响需要可靠且有效的测量方法：一项系统评价的结果
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Mar 23;2:2633489521994197. doi: 10.1177/2633489521994197. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性：一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Quantitative measures used in empirical evaluations of mental health policy implementation: A systematic review.心理健康政策实施实证评估中使用的定量措施：一项系统综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Dec 4;3:26334895221141116. doi: 10.1177/26334895221141116. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
Evaluation of measures of sustainability and sustainability determinants for use in community, public health, and clinical settings: a systematic review.评价用于社区、公共卫生和临床环境的可持续性和可持续性决定因素的措施：系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Dec 13;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01252-1.
引用本文的文献
1
Identifying key determinants influencing the sustainment of physical activity and nutrition programs in Australian primary schools.确定影响澳大利亚小学体育活动和营养计划持续性的关键决定因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Aug 30;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01808-6.
2
Educational Targets for Patient-Reported Outcomes and Caregiver-Reported Outcomes in Psycho-oncology Research.心理肿瘤学研究中患者报告结局和照顾者报告结局的教育目标
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02709-9.
3
The role of organizational characteristics in intervention sustainment: findings from a quantitative analysis in 42 HIV testing clinics in Vietnam.组织特征在干预维持中的作用：越南42家艾滋病毒检测诊所的定量分析结果
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 May 16;6(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00745-6.
4
Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of context at the organizational level: The Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment (IFASIS).组织层面实用情境测量方法的开发与验证：影响成功实施与维持的因素量表（IFASIS）
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 25;6(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00726-9.
5
Development of a pragmatic measure for the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model.为实用、稳健实施与可持续性模型制定一种实用的衡量方法。
Psychol Serv. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1037/ser0000947.
6
Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to advance context-specific and generalizable knowledge of implementation determinants: case study of a digital contingency management platform.运用IFASIS（影响成功实施与维持的因素清单）增进对实施决定因素的特定情境及可推广知识：数字应急管理平台的案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 7;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00708-x.
7
Reflection on a professional advisory group to inform the use of patient empowerment tools within an implementation science research project.关于一个专业咨询小组的思考，该小组为实施科学研究项目中患者赋权工具的使用提供信息。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Dec 2;8(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00811-y.
8
The Application and Evolution of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM): History and Innovations.实用、稳健实施与可持续性模型（PRISM）的应用与演进：历史与创新
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024;4(4):404-420. doi: 10.1007/s43477-024-00134-6. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
9
Development of the implementability assessment tool for clinical practice guidelines based on the COSMIN framework and factorial experiment: a study protocol.基于 COSMIN 框架和析因实验的临床实践指南实施性评估工具的开发：研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1398. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11754-x.
10
What validated instruments, that measure implementation outcomes, are suitable for use in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) setting? A systematic review of systematic reviews.有哪些经过验证的、可用于儿科重症监护病房 (PICU) 环境的测量实施结果的工具？系统评价的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2024 Oct 10;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01378-4.
本文引用的文献
1
A systematic review of school health policy measurement tools: implementation determinants and outcomes.学校卫生政策测量工具的系统评价：实施决定因素与结果
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 26;2(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00169-y.
2
Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review.物理医疗保健环境中使用的实施结果工具：系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 18;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01027-6.
3
Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.卫生政策实施决定因素及结果的定量评估：一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 19;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w.
4
Pragmatic measures for implementation research: development of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS).实用主义实施研究措施：心理测量和实用证据评级量表（PAPERS）的制定。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):11-20. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz164.
5
An updated protocol for a systematic review of implementation-related measures.一项关于实施相关措施的系统评价的更新方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0728-3.
6
Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping.走向实施研究和实践中实用主义测量的标准：一种利益相关者驱动的方法，使用概念映射。
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 3;12(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0649-x.
7
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.三种新开发的实施结果测量工具的心理计量学评估。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
8
The Roles of System and Organizational Leadership in System-Wide Evidence-Based Intervention Sustainment: A Mixed-Method Study.系统和组织领导在全系统基于证据的干预措施维持中的作用：一项混合方法研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Nov;43(6):991-1008. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0751-4.
9
The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership.实施领导力量表（ILS）：开发一种用于衡量单位层面实施领导力的简短工具。
Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 14;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-45.
10
Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them.实用措施：它们是什么以及我们为什么需要它们。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.010.
Zotero 插件