McKay Rachel Eshima, Kohn Michael A, Larson Merlín D
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 94143-0648, San Francisco, California, United States.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01340-9.
Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) remains a critical safety concern, particularly in older adults, yet timely, reliable detection methods are limited. Decline of pupillary unrest in ambient light (PUAL) has demonstrated potential as a marker of opioid effect in young adult subjects. We evaluated whether previously observed PUAL thresholds for high-risk opioid exposure in younger adults remain valid in 40-60-year-old subjects. Ten healthy volunteers 40-60 years of age underwent PUAL measurement at baseline and every 2.5 min during a 10-minute remifentanil infusion (0.2-0.3 µg/kg/min) and 25-minute recovery period. High-risk opioid exposure was defined primarily by modeled remifentanil effect-site concentration (CEREMI) threshold during infusion. Findings were then combined with previously collected data from 20 younger subjects (aged 20-39 years) undergoing an identical infusion protocol. PUAL declined consistently during infusion and increased toward baseline during recovery (p < 0.001). During infusion no significant difference in slope over time or CEREMI was observed between age groups, but during recovery a flatter slope was observed in older subjects (p = 0.016). PUAL reliably distinguished between high-versus low-risk opioid exposure during infusion (AUROC = 0.9833 [95% CI: 0.8935, 0.9995]), with interval likelihood ratio (iLR) for high-toxic opioid effect 27.98 (95% CI: 1.79, 438.33) for PUAL < 0.04, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.38, 1.50) for PUAL 0.04-< 0.14, and 0.030 (95% CI: 0.002, 0.477) for PUAL ≥ 0.14. Comparison of discriminatory performance to that of younger subjects showed no significant difference (chi2 = 1.02, p = 0.3129). PUAL thresholds for high-risk opioid exposure are consistent between younger and older adults and do not require age-specific adjustment up to age 60. PUAL offers a reliable, real-time marker of opioid effect with potential to enhance early OIRD detection in adults.
阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制(OIRD)仍然是一个关键的安全问题,尤其是在老年人中,但及时、可靠的检测方法有限。在环境光下瞳孔活动度下降(PUAL)已被证明有可能作为年轻成年受试者阿片类药物作用的标志物。我们评估了先前观察到的年轻成年人中高风险阿片类药物暴露的PUAL阈值在40至60岁的受试者中是否仍然有效。10名年龄在40至60岁的健康志愿者在基线时以及在10分钟瑞芬太尼输注(0.2 - 0.3µg/kg/min)和25分钟恢复期内每隔2.5分钟进行一次PUAL测量。高风险阿片类药物暴露主要由输注期间模拟的瑞芬太尼效应部位浓度(CEREMI)阈值定义。然后将研究结果与之前从20名年轻受试者(年龄20 - 39岁)收集的、接受相同输注方案的数据相结合。在输注期间PUAL持续下降,在恢复期间向基线水平升高(p < 0.001)。在输注期间,各年龄组之间未观察到随时间变化的斜率或CEREMI有显著差异,但在恢复期间,老年受试者的斜率更平缓(p = 0.016)。在输注期间,PUAL能够可靠地区分高风险与低风险阿片类药物暴露(曲线下面积 = 0.9833 [95%可信区间:0.8935, 0.9995]),对于PUAL < 0.04,高毒性阿片类药物效应的区间似然比(iLR)为27.98(95%可信区间:1.79, 438.33),对于PUAL 0.04 - < 0.14为0.75(95%可信区间:0.38, 1.50),对于PUAL≥0.14为0.030(95%可信区间:0.002, 0.477)。与年轻受试者的鉴别性能比较显示无显著差异(卡方 = 1.02,p = 0.3129)。年轻和老年成年人中高风险阿片类药物暴露的PUAL阈值是一致的,在60岁之前不需要根据年龄进行特定调整。PUAL提供了一个可靠的、实时的阿片类药物作用标志物,有可能加强对成年人早期OIRD的检测。