Hanna Matthew R, Collins Amanda C, Shan Yanyan, Chen Bill, Wang Siyuan, Rosenthal M Zachary
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0329920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329920. eCollection 2025.
Misophonia, characterized by intense negative reactions to specific sounds, is associated with significant emotional distress. The connections among misophonia severity and factors like emotion regulation, anxiety, and anger remain unclear. This study uses network analysis to clarify these relationships in adults with self-reported misophonia symptoms, identifying key intervention targets and processes driving symptom severity.
A community sample of adults with misophonia symptoms and impairment (N = 205) completed psychometrically validated self-report measures, including the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire (DMQ), Misophonia Questionnaire (MQ), and assessments of emotion regulation, anxiety, and anger. Network analysis was conducted to identify associations among misophonia severity, anxiety, anger, and emotion regulation components. Centrality indices were used to evaluate the most influential factors in the network, and community detection was employed to explore underlying clusters.
Misophonia severity was most strongly associated with emotional awareness, nonacceptance, anxiety, and anger. The network analysis revealed that nodes representing emotion regulation strategies, nonacceptance, and impulsivity had the highest centrality and expected influence values, indicating their significant role in the overall network. Community detection identified two distinct clusters: one reflecting emotion dysregulation and misophonia, and the other related to emotional clarity and awareness.
This study highlights the importance of nonacceptance, emotional awareness, anger, and anxiety in understanding misophonia severity. Interventions targeting anger, anxiety, and nonacceptance may be most effective in managing misophonia symptoms. Future research should explore these relationships longitudinally to better inform treatment approaches.
恐音症的特征是对特定声音产生强烈的负面反应,与严重的情绪困扰有关。恐音症严重程度与情绪调节、焦虑和愤怒等因素之间的联系尚不清楚。本研究使用网络分析来阐明自我报告有恐音症症状的成年人中的这些关系,确定驱动症状严重程度的关键干预目标和过程。
一个有恐音症症状和功能损害的成年人社区样本(N = 205)完成了经过心理测量验证的自我报告测量,包括杜克恐音症问卷(DMQ)、恐音症问卷(MQ)以及情绪调节、焦虑和愤怒的评估。进行网络分析以确定恐音症严重程度、焦虑、愤怒和情绪调节成分之间的关联。中心性指标用于评估网络中最具影响力的因素,并采用社区检测来探索潜在的聚类。
恐音症严重程度与情绪意识、不接纳、焦虑和愤怒的关联最为密切。网络分析表明,代表情绪调节策略、不接纳和冲动性的节点具有最高的中心性和预期影响值,表明它们在整个网络中起着重要作用。社区检测确定了两个不同的聚类:一个反映情绪调节障碍和恐音症,另一个与情绪清晰度和意识有关。
本研究强调了不接纳、情绪意识、愤怒和焦虑在理解恐音症严重程度方面的重要性。针对愤怒、焦虑和不接纳的干预措施可能对管理恐音症症状最有效。未来的研究应纵向探索这些关系,以便更好地为治疗方法提供信息。