Longley Esme Supriya Gupta, Bandara Shashika
Department of Global and Public Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;5(8):e0005066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005066. eCollection 2025.
Underrepresentation and lack of inclusion of Global South researchers have been key shortcomings in global health publications. This has contributed to epistemic injustice in global health and impacted evidence informed policymaking. PLOS Global Public Health (GPH)was launched in 2021 with the goal of charting a new path towards equity, diversity and inclusion in global health publications. The journal also invited independent assessments of its progress. This study analyses commissioned 136 front matter content (opinions, reviews, and essays) and a total of 878 authors published in PLOS GPH between October 2021 and December 2024. Using publicly available data from the journal website and online profiles, we examined authorship representation based on World Bank country income classification, gender, and Indigeneity. Additionally, we examined article content in terms of country focus and topics covered. We inferred gender by reviewing public profiles for gendered prefixes and pronouns and when unavailable by using genderize.io. We analyzed for Indigeneity by reviewing authors' public profiles. Our results indicate that 609 of 878 (69%) of authors for the commissioned content were affiliated with high income countries. Under gender representation, 403 of 878 (46%) authors identified as women compared to 471 of 878 (54%) as men. Only 7 of 135 (5%) first authors and 6 of 117 (5%) senior authors publicly identified as Indigenous. While most articles had a global focus (78 of 136, or 57%), 46 of 136 (34%) focused on the Global South, and 12 of 136 (8%) on the Global North. Global South affiliated authors were better represented in articles pertaining to the Global South, comprising on average 43% of authorship compared to an overall average of 30%. To advance equity, journals should commission more content from Global South authors and actively invite contributions from Indigenous and gender-diverse authors on topics relevant to their communities.
全球南方研究人员的代表性不足和缺乏包容性一直是全球卫生出版物的关键缺陷。这导致了全球卫生领域的认知不公正,并影响了基于证据的政策制定。《公共科学图书馆·全球公共卫生》(PLOS GPH)于2021年创刊,旨在为全球卫生出版物中的公平、多样性和包容性开辟一条新道路。该期刊还邀请了对其进展的独立评估。本研究分析了2021年10月至2024年12月期间在《公共科学图书馆·全球公共卫生》上发表的136篇前言内容(观点、评论和文章)以及总共878位作者。利用该期刊网站和在线资料中的公开数据,我们根据世界银行国家收入分类、性别和原住民身份审查了作者的代表性。此外,我们还从文章关注的国家和涵盖的主题方面审查了文章内容。我们通过查看带有性别前缀和代词的公开资料来推断性别,当无法获取时则使用genderize.io。我们通过查看作者的公开资料来分析原住民身份。我们的结果表明,在委托内容的878位作者中,有609位(69%)隶属于高收入国家。在性别代表性方面,878位作者中有403位(46%)被认定为女性,而男性为471位(54%)。在135位第一作者中,只有7位(5%)公开表明为原住民,在117位资深作者中,只有6位(5%)公开表明为原住民。虽然大多数文章关注全球(136篇中有78篇,即57%),但136篇中有46篇(34%)关注全球南方,136篇中有12篇(8%)关注全球北方。在与全球南方相关的文章中,隶属于全球南方的作者代表性更好,平均占作者总数的43%,而总体平均水平为30%。为了促进公平,期刊应委托全球南方作者撰写更多内容,并积极邀请原住民和性别多元化作者就与其社区相关的主题投稿。