• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善低收入和中等收入国家免疫接种数据的数字健康干预措施成本:多国混合方法研究

The Costs of Digital Health Interventions to Improve Immunization Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Multicountry Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Federici Carlo, Verykiou Maria, Cavazza Marianna, Olomi Willyhelmina, Irakiza Piero, Kayumba Kizito, Rodriguez Edith, Castillo Mendoza Luis Enrique, Malvolti Stefano, Hugo Claire, Ntinginya Nyanda Elias, Camara Souleymane, Sabi Issa, Sano Nagnouma, Sibomana Hassan, Condo Jeanine, Torbica Aleksandra, Jommi Claudio, Mantel Carsten, Mangiaterra Viviana

机构信息

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, Milano, 20136, Italy.

NIMR Mbeya Medical Research Centre (NIMR-MMRC), Mbeya, Tanzania.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 18;27:e62746. doi: 10.2196/62746.

DOI:10.2196/62746
PMID:40825241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12360727/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions, such as electronic immunization registries (eIRs) and electronic logistic management information systems (eLMIS), have the potential to significantly improve immunization data management and vaccine logistics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite their growing adoption, there is limited evidence of the financial and economic costs associated with their implementation compared to traditional paper-based systems.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to measure the costs of implementing eIR and eLMIS systems in LMICs and to estimate their economic costs as compared to the previous paper-based registries.

METHODS

The study was conducted across four countries-Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania-which implemented the tools in 2018, 2012, 2019, and 2014, respectively. A combination of primary and secondary data sources was used for the analysis. Retrospective cost data regarding the design, development, and implementation of the tools were directly obtained from implementers and National Immunization Program offices in all countries. Primary survey data were collected to gauge the operational expenses of immunization information systems, both with and without electronic tools, using an activity-based costing approach in 275 facilities. The annual cost of the immunization information system at the national level was then extrapolated and compared to national spending on immunization as a measure of affordability. Costs were reported in 2023 international dollars (I$).

RESULTS

The total costs of designing, developing, and deploying eIR, eLMIS, or both were I$ 2.2, 6.4, 6.8, and 44.3 million in Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania, respectively. Design costs were greatly affected by the degree of customization of the tool, whereas rollout costs were mostly driven by the costs of purchasing hardware and training health workers. Overall, the implementation of the electronic systems was associated with higher costs in Honduras (I$626 per facility, 95% CI 516-821) and Rwanda (I$399, 95% CI I$108-I$691), a cost reduction in Tanzania (-I$2539, 95% CI -I$4290 to -I$789) and no significant cost difference in Guinea. The percentage weight of the cost of managing data with the electronic systems over the total national immunization budgets was estimated at 0.7%, 7.7%, 3.3%, and 4.8% for Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital health interventions such as eIR and eLMIS can potentially reduce costs and improve the efficiency of immunization data management and vaccine logistics in LMICs. However, the extent of cost savings depends on how effectively these digital systems replace traditional paper-based methods and the extent of their use in decision-making, especially at the facility level. Careful planning and investment are essential to unlocking the full economic potential of digital health in LMICs.

摘要

背景

数字健康干预措施,如电子免疫登记系统(eIRs)和电子物流管理信息系统(eLMIS),有潜力显著改善低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的免疫数据管理和疫苗物流。尽管它们的采用率不断提高,但与传统纸质系统相比,关于其实施相关的财务和经济成本的证据有限。

目的

我们旨在衡量在低收入和中等收入国家实施电子免疫登记系统和电子物流管理信息系统的成本,并估计与之前的纸质登记系统相比它们的经济成本。

方法

该研究在四个国家开展——几内亚、洪都拉斯、卢旺达和坦桑尼亚,这四个国家分别于2018年、2012年、2019年和2014年实施了这些工具。分析使用了主要和次要数据源的组合。关于这些工具设计、开发和实施的回顾性成本数据直接从所有国家的实施者和国家免疫规划办公室获取。使用基于活动的成本核算方法,在275个设施中收集主要调查数据,以衡量有无电子工具情况下免疫信息系统的运营费用。然后推断国家层面免疫信息系统的年度成本,并与国家免疫支出进行比较,以此作为可承受性的衡量标准。成本以2023年国际美元(I$)报告。

结果

在几内亚、洪都拉斯、卢旺达和坦桑尼亚,设计、开发和部署电子免疫登记系统、电子物流管理信息系统或两者的总成本分别为220万、640万、680万和4430万国际美元。设计成本受工具定制程度的影响很大,而推广成本主要由购买硬件和培训卫生工作者的成本驱动。总体而言,电子系统的实施在洪都拉斯(每个设施626国际美元,95%CI 516 - 821)和卢旺达(399国际美元,95%CI 108 - 691国际美元)带来了更高的成本,在坦桑尼亚成本降低(-2539国际美元,95%CI -4290至-789国际美元),在几内亚没有显著的成本差异。对于几内亚、洪都拉斯、卢旺达和坦桑尼亚,使用电子系统管理数据的成本在国家免疫总预算中的占比分别估计为0.7%、7.7%、3.3%和4.8%。

结论

诸如电子免疫登记系统和电子物流管理信息系统等数字健康干预措施有潜力降低成本,并提高低收入和中等收入国家免疫数据管理和疫苗物流的效率。然而,成本节约的程度取决于这些数字系统有效取代传统纸质方法的程度以及它们在决策中,特别是在设施层面的使用程度。精心规划和投资对于释放低收入和中等收入国家数字健康的全部经济潜力至关重要。

相似文献

1
The Costs of Digital Health Interventions to Improve Immunization Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Multicountry Mixed Methods Study.改善低收入和中等收入国家免疫接种数据的数字健康干预措施成本:多国混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 18;27:e62746. doi: 10.2196/62746.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
4
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
5
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.
6
Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of male bladder outlet obstruction: long-term follow-up of the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.用于男性膀胱出口梗阻诊断和管理的尿动力学检查:UPSTREAM非劣效性随机对照试验的长期随访
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(26):1-57. doi: 10.3310/SLPT4675.
7
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the "Zindagi Mehfooz" Electronic Immunization Registry and Suite of Digital Health Interventions to Improve the Coverage and Timeliness of Immunization Services in Sindh, Pakistan: Mixed Methods Study.评估“Zindagi Mehfooz”电子免疫登记册和一系列数字健康干预措施,以提高巴基斯坦信德省免疫服务的覆盖率和及时性:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 11;26:e52792. doi: 10.2196/52792.
2
Electronic Immunization Registry in Rwanda: Qualitative Study of Health Worker Experiences.卢旺达电子免疫登记系统:卫生工作者经验的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 28;11:e53071. doi: 10.2196/53071.
3
Immunization Gender Inequity in Pakistan: An Analysis of 6.2 Million Children Born from 2019 to 2022 and Enrolled in the Sindh Electronic Immunization Registry.巴基斯坦免疫接种中的性别不平等:对2019年至2022年出生并登记在信德省电子免疫接种登记系统中的620万儿童的分析。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;11(3):685. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030685.
4
Time Utilization Among Immunization Clinics Using an Electronic Immunization Registry (Part 2): Time and Motion Study of Modified User Workflows.使用电子免疫登记系统的免疫诊所的时间利用情况(第2部分):修改后的用户工作流程的时间与动作研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 16;7:e39777. doi: 10.2196/39777.
5
Design, Development, and Deployment of an Electronic Immunization Registry: Experiences From Vietnam, Tanzania, and Zambia.电子免疫登记系统的设计、开发和部署:来自越南、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚的经验。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Feb 28;11(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00804.
6
Leveraging electronic logistics management information systems to enhance and optimize supply chain response during public health emergencies: lessons from COVID-19 response in Uganda.利用电子物流管理信息系统加强和优化突发公共卫生事件期间的供应链响应:乌干达应对新冠疫情的经验教训
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 17;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00517-4.
7
Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review.常规使用 DHIS2 数据:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 6;22(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08598-8.
8
Changes in on-time vaccination following the introduction of an electronic immunization registry, Tanzania 2016-2018: interrupted time-series analysis.2016-2018 年坦桑尼亚引入电子免疫登记系统后及时接种疫苗的变化:中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08504-2.
9
Added Value of Electronic Immunization Registries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Observational Case Study in Tanzania.电子免疫登记系统在中低收入国家的附加值:坦桑尼亚的观察性案例研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 21;8(1):e32455. doi: 10.2196/32455.
10
Estimating total spending by source of funding on routine and supplementary immunisation activities in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000-17: a financial modelling study.估算 2000-2017 年低收入和中等收入国家常规和补充免疫活动的资金来源总支出:一项金融模型研究。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1875-1893. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01591-9. Epub 2021 Nov 4.