Chen Yiyi, Liu Wei
Department of Ophthalmology, People's Hospital of Yangzhong City, Zhenjiang, 212000, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Suqian First Hospital, The Affiliated Suqian First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhi Road 120, Suqian City, 223800, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04314-2.
To assess the surgical precision and postoperative safety of 3D-printed patient-specific orbital model-assisted absorbable plate reconstruction for orbital wall fractures.
The study included 94 orbital fracture patients divided into two groups: (1) 3D-assisted group (n = 44): treated with absorbable plate reconstruction assisted by 3D-printed orbital models.(2) Conventional group (n = 50): underwent standard absorbable plate reconstruction via traditional surgical approach. Postoperative evaluations at 6-11 months included standardized assessment of diplopia severity, ocular motility impairment, enophthalmos magnitude (Hertel exophthalmometry), and orbital volumetric restoration (CT-based segmentation analysis).
All patients achieved successful surgical outcomes with radiographic confirmation of anatomical reduction via postoperative CT. No cases exhibited postoperative complications including infection, implant displacement, or vision deterioration. Comparative analysis revealed both cohorts demonstrated statistically significant improvements in enophthalmos correction and orbital volume restoration compared to preoperative measurements (P < 0.001). The 3D-assisted group showed superior enophthalmos correction relative to conventional treatment (P = 0.014 < 0.05), along with greater orbital volume restoration (P = 0.008 < 0.05). Diplopia severity and ocular motility limitations were significantly ameliorated in both groups postoperatively (P < 0.001), with the 3D-assisted group achieving better diplopia resolution (P = 0.023 < 0.05) and ocular mobility restoration (P = 0.049 < 0.05) compared to the conventional group. Notably, the 3D-assisted procedure required significantly shorter operative duration than conventional methods (P < 0.001).
The 3D-printed patient-specific orbital model-assisted absorbable plate reconstruction demonstrates superior clinical efficacy to conventional orbital fracture repair, providing precise anatomical restoration with enhanced enophthalmos correction and orbital volumetric accuracy. This technique significantly reduces operative time while achieving better functional outcomes in diplopia resolution and ocular motility recovery. The absence of implant-related complications confirms its procedural safety, establishing this modality as a valuable adjunct in orbital reconstruction surgery.
评估3D打印的患者特异性眼眶模型辅助可吸收板重建眼眶壁骨折的手术精度和术后安全性。
该研究纳入94例眼眶骨折患者,分为两组:(1)3D辅助组(n = 44):采用3D打印眼眶模型辅助可吸收板重建进行治疗。(2)传统组(n = 50):通过传统手术方法进行标准可吸收板重建。术后6 - 11个月的评估包括对复视严重程度、眼球运动障碍、眼球内陷程度(Hertel眼球突出计测量)和眼眶容积恢复(基于CT的分割分析)的标准化评估。
所有患者手术均成功,术后CT证实解剖复位。无病例出现术后并发症,包括感染、植入物移位或视力恶化。对比分析显示,与术前测量相比,两组患者的眼球内陷矫正和眼眶容积恢复均有统计学意义的改善(P < 0.001)。3D辅助组相对于传统治疗在眼球内陷矫正方面表现更优(P = 0.014 < 0.05),眼眶容积恢复也更大(P = 0.008 < 0.05)。两组术后复视严重程度和眼球运动受限均有显著改善(P < 0.001),3D辅助组与传统组相比,复视分辨率更高(P = 0.023 < 0.05),眼球活动恢复更好(P = 0.049 < 0.05)。值得注意的是,3D辅助手术的手术时间明显短于传统方法(P < 0.001)。
3D打印的患者特异性眼眶模型辅助可吸收板重建在临床疗效上优于传统眼眶骨折修复,能实现精确的解剖复位,增强眼球内陷矫正效果和眼眶容积准确性。该技术显著缩短手术时间,同时在复视分辨率和眼球运动恢复方面取得更好的功能结果。无植入物相关并发症证实了其手术安全性,确立了这种方法作为眼眶重建手术中有价值的辅助手段。