Gusovsky Chevalier Amanda V, Lin Chun Chieh, Kerber Kevin, Reynolds Evan L, Callaghan Brian C, Burke James F
Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Division of General Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527476. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27476.
Given increasing costs of neurologic medications, there is a need to explore alternative options to minimize medication spending.
To compare 2024 neurologic medication costs from commercial insurance plans with those available in the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company, a direct-to-consumer pharmacy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study compared medication costs through a direct-to-consumer pharmacy with model-estimated 2024 costs from commercial and Medicare supplemental databases. Commercial insurance plan costs from 2012 to 2021 were used. The direct-to-consumer pricing for each medication was obtained from the website on December 10, 2024.
The difference between direct-to-consumer and overall commercial insurance plan annual out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and total costs were calculated. Total and OOP costs were separately compared between direct-to-consumer and generic-only commercial prices. Aggregate cost differences were presented for OOP and total costs.
Among 79 neurologic medications considered, 33 medications (42%) available for purchase through the direct-to-consumer pharmacy were studied. The direct-to-consumer pharmacy OOP costs were 75% higher and total costs were 413% lower than commercial pharmacies. Among observed medications, teriflunomide (-40%) and droxidopa (-18%) had lower OOP and total costs in the direct-to-consumer pharmacy, with no other medications having lower OOP costs in the direct-to-consumer pharmacy. In generic-only costs, no direct-to-consumer pharmacy medications had lower OOP annual cost. In total costs, 55% of the direct-to-consumer pharmacy medications had lower total annual cost. Teriflunomide (-5600%), droxidopa (-4800%), and dimethyl fumarate (-1900%) had the largest percentage reduction in the direct-to-consumer pharmacy. In aggregate, if all commercial prescriptions were filled in a direct-to-consumer pharmacy, the aggregate OOP expenditures would increase by $82 million.
Practitioners should be aware of options such as direct-to-consumer pharmacies because they can often deliver similar OOP costs for uninsured patients to conventional pharmacies in commercial insurance plans. If pharmacies with direct-to-consumer pharmacy cost structures were widely used, total prescriptions may be markedly reduced.
鉴于神经科药物成本不断增加,有必要探索替代方案以尽量减少药物支出。
比较商业保险计划2024年的神经科药物成本与直接面向消费者的药房马克·库班成本加成制药公司的药物成本。
设计、背景和参与者:这项横断面研究通过直接面向消费者的药房比较了药物成本与商业和医疗保险补充数据库中模型估计的2024年成本。使用了2012年至2021年商业保险计划的成本。每种药物的直接面向消费者的定价于2024年12月10日从该网站获取。
计算了直接面向消费者的成本与商业保险计划总体年度自付费用(OOP)成本及总成本之间的差异。分别比较了直接面向消费者的成本与仅使用非专利药的商业价格之间的总成本和OOP成本。列出了OOP成本和总成本的总体成本差异。
在考虑的79种神经科药物中,研究了可通过直接面向消费者的药房购买的33种药物(42%)。直接面向消费者的药房的OOP成本比商业药房高75%,总成本比商业药房低413%。在观察到的药物中,特立氟胺(-40%)和屈昔多巴(-18%)在直接面向消费者的药房中的OOP成本和总成本较低,在直接面向消费者的药房中没有其他药物的OOP成本更低。在仅使用非专利药的成本方面,直接面向消费者的药房药物的OOP年度成本没有更低的。在总成本方面,55%的直接面向消费者的药房药物的年度总成本更低。特立氟胺(-5600%)、屈昔多巴(-4800%)和富马酸二甲酯(-1900%)在直接面向消费者的药房中的成本降低百分比最大。总体而言,如果所有商业处方都在直接面向消费者的药房配药,总体OOP支出将增加8200万美元。
从业者应了解直接面向消费者的药房等选择,因为对于未参保患者,它们通常能提供与商业保险计划中的传统药房类似的OOP成本。如果广泛使用具有直接面向消费者的药房成本结构的药房,处方总量可能会显著减少。