• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国多发性硬化症治疗的经济学和成本效益分析。

Economics and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies in the USA.

机构信息

Oregon State University/Oregon Health and Science University College of Pharmacy, Collaborative Life Sciences Building (CLSB), 2730 SW Moody Ave., CL5CP, Portland, OR, 97201-5042, USA.

出版信息

Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Oct;14(4):1018-1026. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0566-3.

DOI:10.1007/s13311-017-0566-3
PMID:28812229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5722771/
Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disabling, chronic disease that imposes a significant economic burden on patients and the US healthcare system. The largest cost component for individuals with MS are prescription drugs, specifically disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Despite an increase in the number and diversity of DMTs over the past 10 years, acquisition costs for all DMTs have escalated dramatically at rates substantially higher than medical inflation. Currently, costs for most DMTs exceed $70,000 a year. Recent cost-effectiveness studies suggest the cost for nearly all DMTs exceeds generally accepted thresholds for what is considered a good value in the USA, even after factoring expected rebates. The high cost of DMTs is symptomatic of systemic dysfunction in the pharmaceutical market. Strategies aimed at reigning in high-cost medications include proposals ranging from increasing pricing transparency to allowing Medicare to negotiate directly with manufacturers. Because the economics of pharmaceuticals are inherently complex, a diversity of approaches will be required.

摘要

多发性硬化症(MS)是一种使人丧失能力的慢性疾病,给患者和美国医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担。对于多发性硬化症患者来说,最大的成本组成部分是处方药,特别是疾病修正疗法(DMTs)。尽管在过去 10 年中,DMT 的数量和种类有所增加,但所有 DMT 的获取成本都以远高于医疗通胀的速度大幅上升。目前,大多数 DMT 的成本超过每年 70000 美元。最近的成本效益研究表明,即使考虑到预期的回扣,几乎所有 DMT 的成本都超过了在美国被认为是物有所值的普遍接受的阈值。DMT 的高成本反映了制药市场的系统性功能障碍。控制高成本药物的策略包括从提高定价透明度到允许医疗保险与制造商直接谈判的各种建议。由于药品经济学本质上很复杂,因此需要采用多种方法。

相似文献

1
Economics and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies in the USA.美国多发性硬化症治疗的经济学和成本效益分析。
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Oct;14(4):1018-1026. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0566-3.
2
The cost of multiple sclerosis drugs in the US and the pharmaceutical industry: Too big to fail?美国多发性硬化症药物的成本与制药行业:规模太大而不能倒?
Neurology. 2015 May 26;84(21):2185-92. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001608. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
3
Economics of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies in the USA.美国多发性硬化症疾病修正治疗的经济学
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 May 5;21(7):28. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01118-x.
4
Disease modifying therapies continue to drive up health care cost among individuals with multiple sclerosis.疾病修正疗法持续推高多发性硬化症患者的医疗保健费用。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 May;30:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
5
Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies in the management of multiple sclerosis for the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中多发性硬化症治疗的疾病修正疗法的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):657-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00485.x.
6
The fiscal consequences of public health investments in disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in Sweden.瑞典用于治疗多发性硬化症的疾病修正疗法的公共卫生投资的财政后果。
J Med Econ. 2020 Aug;23(8):831-837. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1757457. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Cost-effectiveness analyses in multiple sclerosis: a review of modelling approaches.多发性硬化症的成本效益分析:建模方法综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jun;32(6):559-72. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0150-1.
8
Health economics and patient outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus disease-modifying therapies for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States of America.在美国,造血干细胞移植与疾病修饰疗法治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的卫生经济学与患者预后
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Oct;45:102404. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102404. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Perspectives for managed care organizations on the burden of multiple sclerosis and the cost-benefits of disease-modifying therapies.管理式医疗组织对多发性硬化负担及疾病修正疗法成本效益的看法。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1 Suppl A):S41-53. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.s1.S41.
10
Implications of real-world adherence on cost-effectiveness analysis in multiple sclerosis.真实世界依从性对多发性硬化成本效益分析的影响。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(4):547-51. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.774281. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurologic Medication Costs in a Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacy vs Commercial Insurance Plans.直接面向消费者的药房与商业保险计划中的神经科药物成本
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527476. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27476.
2
Generics, Biosimilars and Follow-On Non-Biologic Complex Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of the Regulatory and Clinical Implications for European Neurologists.多发性硬化症的仿制药、生物类似药和后续非生物复杂药物:欧洲神经科医生监管及临床意义的叙述性综述
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Apr;32(4):e70140. doi: 10.1111/ene.70140.
3
Financial burden of out of pocket nonpharmacological therapies in an Austrian multiple sclerosis cohort.奥地利多发性硬化症队列中自费非药物治疗的经济负担。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94740-5.
4
High-Field-Blinded Assessment of Portable Ultra-Low-Field Brain MRI for Multiple Sclerosis.便携式超低场脑磁共振成像对多发性硬化症的高场盲法评估
J Neuroimaging. 2025 Jan-Feb;35(1):e70005. doi: 10.1111/jon.70005.
5
Costs of Potential Medication Wastage Due to Switching Treatment Among People With Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者因更换治疗方案导致的潜在药物浪费成本。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024 Oct 28;11(2):103-108. doi: 10.36469/001c.123336. eCollection 2024.
6
Multiple sclerosis subgroups: Data-driven clusters based on patient-reported outcomes and a large clinical sample.多发性硬化亚组:基于患者报告结局和大样本临床数据的驱动聚类。
Mult Scler. 2024 Nov;30(13):1642-1652. doi: 10.1177/13524585241282763. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
7
Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Ublituximab in the Treatment of MS: Design, Development and Place in Therapy.评估乌利昔单抗在多发性硬化症治疗中的治疗潜力:设计、开发和治疗中的定位。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Jul 16;18:3025-3042. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S388410. eCollection 2024.
8
Healthcare resource utilization and economic burden of multiple sclerosis in Chinese patients: results from a real-world survey.中国多发性硬化症患者的医疗资源利用和经济负担:一项真实世界调查的结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64713-1.
9
Portable multi-focal visual evoked potential diagnostics for multiple sclerosis/optic neuritis patients.便携式多焦点视觉诱发电位诊断多发性硬化症/视神经炎患者。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;149(1):23-45. doi: 10.1007/s10633-024-09980-z. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
10
Tolerability and Acceptance of Switching from Brand to Generic Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者从品牌药换成通用型醋酸格拉替雷的耐受性和接受度
J Clin Med. 2024 May 9;13(10):2780. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102780.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Prescription Drug Price Rebates in Medicare Part D With Patient Out-of-Pocket and Federal Spending.医疗保险D部分处方药价格回扣与患者自付费用及联邦支出的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1185-1188. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1885.
2
Financing and Distribution of Pharmaceuticals in the United States.美国药品的融资与分销
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):21-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5607.
3
Reducing costs while enhancing quality of care in MS.在多发性硬化症中降低成本同时提高护理质量。
Neurology. 2016 Oct 11;87(15):1617-1622. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003113. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
4
Price analysis of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies marketed in the United States.美国市场上多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的价格分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Nov;32(11):1783-1788. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1208644. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
5
Economic burden of multiple sclerosis and the role of managed sare organizations in multiple sclerosis management.多发性硬化症的经济负担以及管理式医疗组织在多发性硬化症管理中的作用。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jun;22(6 Suppl):s151-8.
6
State Initiatives to Control Medication Costs--Can Transparency Legislation Help?控制药物成本的国家举措——透明度立法能有所帮助吗?
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2301-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605100.
7
Practices of US health insurance companies concerning MS therapies interfere with shared decision-making and harm patients.美国健康保险公司针对多发性硬化症治疗的做法干扰了共同决策,对患者造成了伤害。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;6(2):177-182. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000208.
8
Rituximab versus fingolimod after natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients.利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症患者后的芬戈莫德。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jun;79(6):950-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.24651. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
Stemming the Escalating Cost of Prescription Drugs: A Position Paper of the American College of Physicians.遏制处方药费用的不断上涨:美国医师学会的立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jul 5;165(1):50-52. doi: 10.7326/M15-2768. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Multiple sclerosis prevalence in the United States commercially insured population.美国商业保险人群中的多发性硬化症患病率。
Neurology. 2016 Mar 15;86(11):1014-21. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002469. Epub 2016 Feb 17.