Suppr超能文献

青少年和青年对旨在抵制电子烟错误信息在社交媒体上传播的弹出式窗口的认知:横断面调查研究

Adolescents' and Young Adults' Perceptions of a Pop-Up Aimed at Combating the Spread of E-Cigarette Misinformation on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

作者信息

Maturo Jessica, Gaiha Shivani Mathur

机构信息

Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, 1 Autumn St, 5th Fl, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 6173553538.

Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 19;9:e73193. doi: 10.2196/73193.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social media is an important source of e-cigarette-related information for adolescents and young adults. However, misinformation is being shared across platforms, which may encourage e-cigarette use.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine adolescent and young adult perceptions of a novel pop-up on social media that provides links to vaping-related health information from credible sources (eg, CDC).

METHODS

Between December 2023 and March 2024, participants aged 13-24 years (N=5326) completed a web-based cross-sectional survey. Participants were asked to select from 4 positive (eg, useful to share, helpful to check health-related information) and 4 negative or neutral sentiments (eg, usually ignore such notifications, would not trust it) to reflect their perceptions about a mock pop-up that provided a link to e-cigarette-related information on social media.

RESULTS

More participants endorsed positive sentiments than negative or neutral sentiments in relation to the pop-up. Specifically, 1078 (20.8%) endorsed two or more positive sentiments, and 690 (13.3%) endorsed two or more negative or neutral sentiments when searching for "vaping" on social media; similarly 913 (17.6%) participants endorsed two or more positive sentiments and 690 (13.3%) endorsed two or more negative or neutral sentiments when viewing e-cigarette-related posts in their feed (all P<.001). Among those who were searching for e-cigarette-related information, participants aged 13-18 years were more likely to endorse at least two positive sentiments compared to those aged 19-24 years (ie, 646, 22.0% vs 423, 19.2%, respectively), those who had never used e-cigarettes compared with those who had ever used them (ie, 674, 23.6% vs 404, 17.3%, respectively), and those who last used e-cigarettes more than 30 days ago compared with those who had used them in the past 30 days (ie, 187, 19.8% vs 217, 15.6%, respectively). Similarly, among participants who viewed e-cigarette-related posts in their feed, those who had never used e-cigarettes were more likely to endorse two or more positive perceptions compared to those who had ever used e-cigarettes (ie, 563, 19.7% vs 350, 15.0%), and those who had last used e-cigarettes more than 30 days ago (ie, 159, 16.9% vs 191, 13.7%) were more likely to endorse two or more positive perceptions compared to those who had used them in the past 30 days (all Ps<.001). Participants who had never used e-cigarettes were also less likely to trust pop-ups, compared to those who had ever used them, whether while searching for e-cigarette-related information on social media or while seeing e-cigarette-related posts in their feed (approximately, 19%vs 24%). There were no significant differences in the endorsement of negative or neutral sentiments. However, participants aged 13-18 years were more likely to ignore such notifications while viewing e-cigarette-related posts in their social media feed compared to those aged 19-24 years (ie, 850, 28.9% vs 563 25%); further, participants who had never used e-cigarettes were less trusting of e-cigarette-related information while searching for vaping or in their feed.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive perception of a social media pop-up indicates its potential to prevent e-cigarette-related misinformation. Further development of a pop-up requires strategies to better engage and inform adolescents and young adults, specifically younger individuals, as they may be more likely to disregard pop-ups, and older individuals and those who used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days, as they are potentially more dismissive of such information.

摘要

背景

社交媒体是青少年和年轻人获取电子烟相关信息的重要来源。然而,错误信息在各平台上传播,这可能会促使人们使用电子烟。

目的

本研究旨在调查青少年和年轻人对社交媒体上一种新型弹出式窗口的看法,该窗口提供来自可靠来源(如美国疾病控制与预防中心)的与电子烟相关的健康信息链接。

方法

在2023年12月至2024年3月期间,13至24岁的参与者(N = 5326)完成了一项基于网络的横断面调查。参与者被要求从4种积极情绪(如分享有用、有助于查看健康相关信息)和4种消极或中性情绪(如通常忽略此类通知、不会信任它)中进行选择,以反映他们对一个模拟弹出式窗口的看法,该窗口提供了社交媒体上与电子烟相关信息的链接。

结果

与消极或中性情绪相比,更多参与者认可与弹出式窗口相关的积极情绪。具体而言,在社交媒体上搜索“电子烟”时,1078名(20.8%)参与者认可两种或更多积极情绪,690名(13.3%)参与者认可两种或更多消极或中性情绪;同样,在浏览其动态中与电子烟相关的帖子时,913名(17.6%)参与者认可两种或更多积极情绪,690名(13.3%)参与者认可两种或更多消极或中性情绪(所有P <.001)。在搜索与电子烟相关信息的人群中,13至18岁的参与者比19至24岁的参与者更有可能认可至少两种积极情绪(分别为646名,22.0%和423名,19.2%),从未使用过电子烟的参与者比曾经使用过电子烟的参与者更有可能认可至少两种积极情绪(分别为674名,23.6%和404名,17.3%),最后一次使用电子烟超过30天前的参与者比在过去30天内使用过电子烟的参与者更有可能认可至少两种积极情绪(分别为187名,19.8%和217名,15.6%)。同样,在浏览其动态中与电子烟相关帖子的参与者中,从未使用过电子烟的参与者比曾经使用过电子烟的参与者更有可能认可两种或更多积极看法(分别为563名,19.7%和350名,15.0%),最后一次使用电子烟超过30天前的参与者(分别为159名,16.9%和191名,13.7%)比在过去30天内使用过电子烟的参与者更有可能认可两种或更多积极看法(所有P <.001)。与曾经使用过电子烟的参与者相比,从未使用过电子烟的参与者在社交媒体上搜索与电子烟相关信息或在浏览其动态中看到与电子烟相关帖子时,也不太可能信任弹出式窗口(大约为19%对24%)。在认可消极或中性情绪方面没有显著差异。然而,在浏览社交媒体动态中与电子烟相关的帖子时,13至18岁的参与者比19至24岁的参与者更有可能忽略此类通知(分别为850名,28.9%和563名,25%);此外,从未使用过电子烟的参与者在搜索电子烟相关信息或浏览其动态时,对与电子烟相关信息的信任度较低。

结论

对社交媒体弹出式窗口的积极看法表明其有潜力防止与电子烟相关的错误信息传播。弹出式窗口的进一步开发需要采取策略,以更好地吸引和告知青少年和年轻人,特别是较年轻的个体,因为他们可能更有可能忽略弹出式窗口,以及年龄较大的个体和在过去30天内使用过电子烟的个体,因为他们可能更轻视此类信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e36/12364415/b7b200d36aeb/formative-v9-e73193-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验