Liu Lingbo, Onega Tracy, Moen Erika L, Tosteson Anna N A, Smith Rebecca E, Wang Qianfei, Cowan Lauren, Wang Fahui
Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 19;8(1):534. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01931-5.
Telehealth has been promoted as a solution to spatial healthcare access barriers, yet its role in addressing cancer care disparities remains uncertain, particularly in the context of digital divides in broadband availability and affordability. This study assessed spatial and telehealth accessibility to cancer care across 33,499 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) in the United States using the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) and two-step virtual catchment area (2SVCA) methods, respectively. Incorporating physician locations, cancer incidence, travel time based on transportation networks, and broadband coverage and subscription rates, we found that accessibility declined from urban to rural areas and was lower in ZCTA with greater socioeconomic deprivation. Areas with higher proportions of Black and Hispanic populations showed modestly higher access scores, yet a three-way interaction among rurality, deprivation, and racial ethnic composition revealed compounded disadvantages. Telehealth reduced but did not eliminate these gaps, highlighting how its reliance on digital infrastructure may both alleviate and intensify disparities in cancer care access.
远程医疗已被推广为解决空间医疗服务获取障碍的一种方案,但其在解决癌症护理差异方面的作用仍不明确,尤其是在宽带可用性和可负担性存在数字鸿沟的背景下。本研究分别使用两步浮动集水区(2SFCA)和两步虚拟集水区(2SVCA)方法,评估了美国33499个邮政编码分区(ZCTA)的癌症护理的空间和远程医疗可及性。结合医生地点、癌症发病率、基于交通网络的出行时间以及宽带覆盖范围和订阅率,我们发现可及性从城市到农村地区逐渐下降,并且在社会经济剥夺程度较高的ZCTA中更低。黑人和西班牙裔人口比例较高的地区显示出略高的可及性得分,但农村、贫困和种族构成之间的三方相互作用揭示了复合劣势。远程医疗减少但并未消除这些差距,凸显了其对数字基础设施的依赖如何既可能缓解也可能加剧癌症护理获取方面的差异。