Lyu C B, Lu J, Xu B B, Pan H D, Chen Q X, Chen J, Sun Y Q, Zhang Y B, Cai L S, Liu F L
Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000,China.
Second Department of Gastric Surgery,Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,Shanghai 200032,China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Aug 20;63(10):953-962. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250422-00214.
To investigate the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy on the safety and efficacy of radical resection in patients with cT3-4NxM0 gastric cancer. A retrospective cohort study method was used. The clinicopathological data of 515 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after neoadjuvant treatment at Second Department of Gastric Surgery,Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Gastric Surgery,Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University from January 2020 to June 2023 were collected. Among them,379 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone(chemotherapy group),and 136 patients received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy(immunotherapy group). There were 382 males and 133 females,with an age of (58.4±10.9)years(range:26 to 85 years). To reduce the influence of potential confounding factors,a 1∶1 propensity score matching method was adopted,and the clamp value was 0.02. The peri-operative safety,imaging and postoperative pathological tumor regression,and prognosis were compared by independent sample -test, Mann-Whitney test, test or Fisher exact probability method between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves, and the differences between groups were compared by Log-rank test. After matching, there were 101 patients in each of the chemotherapy group and the immunotherapy group. The baseline data of the patients in the two groups were evenly distributed (all 0.05). According to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, the complete response rate (11.9% (12/101) 4.0% (4/101)), partial response rate(68.3%(69/101) 53.4%(54/101)), stable disease rate (17.8%(18/101) 39.6%(40/101)) and disease progression rate (2.0%(2/101) 3.0%(3/101)) between the immunotherapy group and the chemotherapy group were no statistical defferences (=14.374,=0.002), and objective response rate (80.2%(81/101) 57.4%(58/101), =12.203, <0.01) in the immunotherapy group was higher than that in the chemotherapy group. The results of postoperative pathological examination showed that the immunotherapy group had a higher complete response rate (16.8%(17/101) 6.9% (7/101), =4.728, =0.030) and major pathological response rate (42.6%(43/101) 23.8% (24/101), =8.062, =0.005). For the two groups, the operation time (175.0(76.0)minutes 160.0 (30.0)minutes, =-0.059, =0.953), intraoperative blood loss (110.0 (150.0)ml 100.0 (120.0)ml, =-0.370, =0.712), overall incidence of postoperative complications (20.8%(21/101) 18.8%(19/101), =0.125, =0.724) and incidence of severe complications (5.0%(5/101) 3.0%(3/101), =0.130,=0.718) were comparable. The median follow-up time of all patients was 46 months(range: 19 to 61 months). The 3-year overall survival rate (63.2% 54.4%, =0.035) and progression-free survival rate (59.1% 45.6%, =0.022) of the immunotherapy group were higher than those of the chemotherapy group. Meanwhile, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of neoadjuvant-treatment-related adverse events (48.5%(49/101) 40.6% (41/101), =1.283, =0.411) and the incidence of severe adverse reactions of grade 3 or above (13.9% (14/101) 10.9% (11/101), =0.257, =0.522) between the two groups. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve the imaging and postoperative pathological tumor response rates and 3-year survival rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer,without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications and neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse event.
探讨新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗对cT3-4NxM0期胃癌患者根治性切除安全性及疗效的影响。采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2020年1月至2023年6月在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院胃外科二病区及福建医科大学附属漳州市医院胃外科接受新辅助治疗后行根治性胃切除术的515例患者的临床病理资料。其中,379例患者单纯接受新辅助化疗(化疗组),136例患者接受新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗(免疫治疗组)。患者共382例男性和133例女性,年龄为(58.4±10.9)岁(范围:26至85岁)。为减少潜在混杂因素的影响,采用1∶1倾向评分匹配法,匹配值为0.02。通过独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney检验、χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法比较两组患者的围手术期安全性、影像学及术后病理肿瘤退缩情况和预后。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,通过Log-rank检验比较组间差异。匹配后,化疗组和免疫治疗组各有101例患者。两组患者的基线资料均衡分布(均P>0.05)。根据RECIST 1.1标准,免疫治疗组与化疗组的完全缓解率(11.9%(12/101)对4.0%(4/101))、部分缓解率(68.3%(69/101)对53.4%(54/101))、疾病稳定率(17.8%(18/101)对39.6%(40/101))和疾病进展率(2.0%(2/101)对3.0%(3/101))差异无统计学意义(χ²=14.374,P=0.002),但免疫治疗组的客观缓解率(80.2%(81/101)对57.4%(58/101),χ²=12.203,P<0.01)高于化疗组。术后病理检查结果显示免疫治疗组的完全缓解率(16.8%(17/101)对6.9%(7/101),χ²=4.728,P=0.030)和主要病理缓解率(42.6%(43/101)对23.8%(24/101),χ²=8.062,P=0.005)更高。两组患者的手术时间(175.0(76.0)分钟对1;60.0(30.0)分钟,t=-0.059,P=0.953)、术中出血量(110.0(150.0)ml对100.0(120.0)ml,t=-0.370,P=0.712)、术后并发症总发生率(20.8%(21/101)对18.8%(19/101),χ²=0.125,P=0.724)和严重并发症发生率(5.0%(5/101)对3.0%(3/101),χ²=;0.130,P=0.718)相当。所有患者的中位随访时间为46个月(范围:19至61个月)。免疫治疗组的3年总生存率(63.2%对54.4%,χ²=0.035)和无进展生存率(59.1%对45.6%,χ²=0.022)高于化疗组。同时,两组新辅助治疗相关不良事件发生率(48.5%(49/101)对40.6%(41/101),χ²=1.283,P=0.411)及3级及以上严重不良反应发生率(13.9%(14/101)对10.9%(11/101),χ²=0.257,P=0.522)差异无统计学意义。新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗可显著提高局部进展期胃癌患者的影像学及术后病理肿瘤缓解率和3年生存率,且不增加术后并发症及新辅助治疗相关不良事件的发生率。