Ma Hong-Yu, Liu Xin, Chen Yuan-Wu, Liang Jing, Wang Jie, Zhang Ming-Ming, Yang Qian
Department of Spleen and Stomach Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106487. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106487.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the resection rate and reduces postoperative recurrence in gastric cancer (GC) but is often associated with significant toxicity. Traditional Chinese medicine has unique advantages in the treatment of cancer, and Baohe Pingwei powder can help alleviate the side effects of chemotherapy and enhance the therapeutic effect. However, there is no clinical evidence supporting its use in patients who underwent surgery for GC treatment.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Baohe Pingwei powder combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in postoperative patients with GC and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment of postoperative patients with GC with integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 postoperative patients with GC admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology of our hospital and treated between May 2024 and November 2024. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into a control group (54 patients received S-1 + oxaliplatin chemotherapy 4 weeks after surgery) and a study group (26 cases were combined with Baohe Pingwei powder combined with S-1 + oxaliplatin). Clinical data were collected to compare the differences in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse reactions of patients with GC after surgery under different treatment methods. Further based on the control of GC, patients were divided into an effective group (62 cases) and an ineffective group (18 cases). The relationship between Baohe Pingwei powder and clinical efficacy was analyzed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis as well as a multivariate Cox risk model.
The baseline characteristics including age, gender, and other demographic factors showed no significant differences between the control and observation groups ( > 0.05). In the observation group, there were 24 cases of effective treatment and 2 cases of ineffective treatment, with an ORR of 84.62% and a DCR of 92.31%. In the control group, there were 38 cases of effective treatment and 16 cases of ineffective treatment, with an ORR of 46.30% and a DCR of 70.37%. The treatment effect of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group ( < 0.05). The Kaplan Meier curve showed that the risk of tumor recurrence and death in the observation group was significantly reduced compared to the control group (log rank = 0.030 and = 0.035, respectively). Subsequent stratification based on treatment response identified 62 patients in the effective group and 18 in the ineffective group. Intergroup comparison showed that the effective group had a higher proportion of Baohe Pingwei powder ( = 0.000), and there were statistically significant differences in tumor size, differentiation degree, and post-treatment levels of CD3, CD4, CA19-9, CA242, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α between the groups ( < 0.05). Further univariate and multivariate logistic analysis revealed that CD3 and CD4 T cell levels were significantly associated with treatment efficacy. The use of Baohe Pingwei powder was a protective factor for effective treatment, while CA19-9 and IL-6 levels were independent risk factors for ineffective treatment ( < 0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis found that without adjusting the model, the risk of ineffective treatment in patients significantly decreased with the increase of CD3 and CD4 and the decrease of CA19-9 and IL-6 (group 1 as a reference; group 2 hazard ratio: 0.624, 95% confidence interval: 0.437-0.986, = 0.019). After adjusting for confounding factors such as Baohe Pingwei powder in Model 3, Cox regression results showed an increased risk of treatment failure. With the decrease of CD3 and CD4 and the increase of CA19-9 and IL-6, the risk of treatment failure in patients significantly increased (Group 1 as a reference; Group 2 hazard ratio: 1.439, 95% confidence interval: 1.208-1.614, = 0.006).
The combination therapy of Baohe Pingwei powder with neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated significant clinical benefits in postoperative patients with GC, including improved the ORR, DCR, extended progression-free survival, and overall survival as well as a reduced incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Furthermore, our finding indicated that decreased CD3 and CD4 levels along with evaluated CA199 and IL-6 levels served as important biomarkers predicting increased risk of treatment failure in this patient population.
新辅助化疗可提高胃癌(GC)的切除率并降低术后复发率,但常伴有显著毒性。中药在癌症治疗方面具有独特优势,保和平胃散有助于减轻化疗副作用并增强治疗效果。然而,尚无临床证据支持其用于接受GC手术治疗的患者。
评估保和平胃散联合新辅助化疗对GC术后患者的安全性和疗效,为中西医结合治疗GC术后患者提供循证医学依据。
对2024年5月至2024年11月期间我院胃肠科收治的80例GC术后患者进行回顾性分析。根据不同治疗方法,将他们分为对照组(54例患者在术后4周接受S-1 +奥沙利铂化疗)和研究组(26例联合保和平胃散与S-1 +奥沙利铂)。收集临床数据,比较不同治疗方法下GC术后患者的客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期、总生存期及不良反应的差异。进一步根据GC的控制情况,将患者分为有效组(62例)和无效组(18例)。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以及多因素Cox风险模型分析保和平胃散与临床疗效的关系。
对照组和观察组的年龄、性别等人口统计学因素等基线特征无显著差异(>0.05)。观察组有效治疗24例,无效治疗2例,ORR为84.62%,DCR为92.31%。对照组有效治疗38例,无效治疗16例,ORR为46.30%,DCR为70.37%。观察组的治疗效果显著高于对照组(<0.05)。Kaplan Meier曲线显示,观察组肿瘤复发和死亡风险与对照组相比显著降低(对数秩分别为0.030和0.035)。随后根据治疗反应进行分层,有效组62例,无效组18例。组间比较显示,有效组保和平胃散的比例更高(=0.000),两组间肿瘤大小、分化程度以及治疗后CD3、CD4、CA19-9、CA242、IL-6、IL-10和TNF-α水平存在统计学显著差异(<0.05)。进一步的单因素和多因素逻辑分析显示,CD3和CD4 T细胞水平与治疗疗效显著相关。使用保和平胃散是有效治疗的保护因素,而CA19-9和IL-6水平是无效治疗的独立危险因素(<0.05)。多因素Cox比例风险模型分析发现,在未调整模型时,随着CD3和CD4升高以及CA19-9和IL-6降低,患者无效治疗的风险显著降低(以第1组为参照;第2组风险比:0.624,95%置信区间:0.437 - 0.986,=0.019)。在模型3中调整保和平胃散等混杂因素后,Cox回归结果显示治疗失败风险增加。随着CD3和CD4降低以及CA19-9和IL-6升高,患者治疗失败的风险显著增加(以第1组为参照;第2组风险比:1.439,95%置信区间:1.208 - 1.614,=0.006)。
保和平胃散联合新辅助化疗对GC术后患者具有显著临床益处,包括提高ORR、DCR,延长无进展生存期和总生存期以及降低治疗相关不良事件的发生率。此外,我们的研究结果表明,CD3和CD4水平降低以及评估的CA199和IL-6水平升高是预测该患者群体治疗失败风险增加的重要生物标志物。