Susilo Kartika R, Eu Anastasia, Besemer Britt, Heuvelink Ep, de Vos Ric C H, Marcelis Leo F M
Department of Plant Sciences, Horticulture and Product Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Division of Urban Food Solutions, Department of Agri-tech and Food Innovation, Singapore Food Agency, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Aug 4;16:1621513. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1621513. eCollection 2025.
The duration of light exposure each day, termed the photoperiod, is a crucial environmental cue that influence several aspects of plant physiology, including growth, development, and metabolic activity. Adjusting the photoperiod in controlled agriculture systems has the potential to improve crop yield and nutritional content. However, the benefits of longer photoperiods compared to higher light intensities under a fixed daily light integral (DLI) have not been thoroughly examined for many leafy vegetables. DLI is the total amount of light a plant receives per day and it is the product of photoperiod and light intensity. This study aimed to determine to what extent the effect of DLI on pak choi ( subsp. ) growth, yield and quality depends on whether DLI is changed by light intensity (PPFD) or by photoperiod.
Three cultivars ('Hybrid Special', 'Red Summer', and 'Shanghai Green') were grown under four different DLIs (10.8, 13.5, 16.2, and 18.9 mol m d). These DLIs were achieved either by varying the photoperiod (12, 15, 18 and 21 hours) at a constant PPFD 250 µmol m s or by varying the PPFD (167, 208, 250, and 292 µmol m s) at a constant photoperiod (18 hours).
Increasing DLI by extending the photoperiod resulted in more growth than increasing DLI by increasing PPFD. Photoperiod extension also generally resulted in higher light use efficiency and energy use efficiency than increasing DLI by increasing PPFD. The content of vitamin C, glucosinolates and many other metabolites increased significantly with higher DLI regardless whether DLI was increased through PPFD or photoperiod. However, DLI did not affect shelf life and overall visual quality.
These results suggest that extending photoperiod is a more effective strategy than increasing light intensity for optimizing leafy vegetable production in controlled environments.
每天的光照时长,即光周期,是一种关键的环境信号,会影响植物生理学的多个方面,包括生长、发育和代谢活动。在可控农业系统中调节光周期有可能提高作物产量和营养成分。然而,对于许多叶菜类蔬菜而言,在固定的日光照积分(DLI)下,较长光周期相较于较高光照强度的益处尚未得到充分研究。DLI是植物每天接受的总光照量,它是光周期和光照强度的乘积。本研究旨在确定DLI对小白菜(亚种)生长、产量和品质的影响在多大程度上取决于DLI是通过光照强度(光合光子通量密度,PPFD)还是光周期来改变。
三个品种(‘杂交特选’、‘红夏’和‘上海青’)在四种不同的DLI(10.8、13.5、16.2和18.9摩尔·米⁻²·天⁻¹)下种植。这些DLI通过在恒定的PPFD 250微摩尔·米⁻²·秒⁻¹下改变光周期(12、15、18和21小时)或在恒定光周期(18小时)下改变PPFD(167、208、250和292微摩尔·米⁻²·秒⁻¹)来实现。
通过延长光周期增加DLI比通过增加PPFD增加DLI导致更多的生长。光周期延长通常也比通过增加PPFD增加DLI具有更高的光利用效率和能量利用效率。无论DLI是通过PPFD还是光周期增加,维生素C、芥子油苷和许多其他代谢物的含量都随着较高的DLI而显著增加。然而,DLI不影响货架期和整体视觉品质。
这些结果表明,在可控环境中,延长光周期是比增加光照强度更有效的优化叶菜类蔬菜生产的策略。