Springer Saren M, Fleck Katherine, Girardini Kaitlin N, Riccard Sean M, Erceg Jelena, Kanadia Rahul N
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 15:2025.08.11.669784. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.11.669784.
Three-dimensional (3D) genome organization influences transcription and RNA processing, yet how the spatial positioning of genes contributes to pre-mRNA splicing has only recently come into focus. Despite these advances, it remains unclear how introns, particularly rare intron classes, are organized within the 3D genome and whether this organization influences their splicing. Here, we mapped the spatial organization of six intron classes including major, minor, minor-like, hybrid, major-like and non-canonical across four human cell lines (K562, H1, HCT116, and HFFc6) using Hi-C, TSA-seq, and DamID-seq data. This revealed minor intron enrichment in active compartments A and speckle-associated domains (SPADs) and depletion from lamina-associated domains (LADs), whereas hybrid and non-canonical introns showed the opposite trend. Integrating TSA-seq with RNA-seq data suggested that splicing efficiency depends on intron identity rather than nuclear positioning. For example, major-like, minor-like, and non-canonical introns in SPADs were less efficiently spliced than major and minor introns despite their proximity to nuclear speckles. These patterns were consistent across cancer (K562, HCT116) and stem cells (H1) but not fibroblasts (HFFc6). Comparison of minor intron splicing in and out of SPADs across cell lines revealed that, relative to fibroblasts, minor introns outside of SPADs in cancer cells were more efficiently spliced. This suggests that increased efficiency of minor intron splicing in cancer cell lines is not necessarily due to 3D positioning. In all, these findings reveal that intron subclasses show distinct nuclear organization, yet for minor introns, identity rather than position governs splicing efficiency.
三维(3D)基因组组织影响转录和RNA加工,然而基因的空间定位如何影响前体mRNA剪接直到最近才受到关注。尽管有这些进展,但目前仍不清楚内含子,特别是罕见的内含子类别,在3D基因组中是如何组织的,以及这种组织是否会影响它们的剪接。在这里,我们利用Hi-C、TSA-seq和DamID-seq数据,绘制了包括主要、次要、类次要、杂合、类主要和非经典在内的六种内含子类别在四种人类细胞系(K562、H1、HCT116和HFFc6)中的空间组织图谱。这揭示了次要内含子在活跃区室A和斑点相关结构域(SPADs)中富集,而从核纤层相关结构域(LADs)中耗尽,而杂合和非经典内含子则呈现相反的趋势。将TSA-seq与RNA-seq数据整合表明,剪接效率取决于内含子的特性而非核定位。例如,尽管SPADs中的类主要、类次要和非经典内含子靠近核斑点,但它们的剪接效率低于主要和次要内含子。这些模式在癌症细胞系(K562、HCT116)和干细胞(H1)中是一致的,但在成纤维细胞(HFFc6)中并非如此。跨细胞系比较SPADs内外的次要内含子剪接情况发现,相对于成纤维细胞,癌细胞中SPADs外的次要内含子剪接效率更高。这表明癌细胞系中次要内含子剪接效率的提高不一定是由于3D定位。总之,这些发现揭示了内含子亚类显示出不同的核组织,然而对于次要内含子,特性而非位置决定剪接效率。