Suppr超能文献

参与式公民模式如何为健康研究中的共同生产提供信息?一项系统综述。

How Do Participatory Citizenship Models Inform Co-production in Health Research? A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Rose Catharine, Donnelly Lois, Howdle Jess, Lynes Mark, Arnett Katharine, Nettle Mary, Bradley Eleanor

机构信息

Research Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70394. doi: 10.1111/hex.70394.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Co-production within health research has increased rapidly over the past two decades, enabling citizens to shape health policy and practice. Yet, co-production can be shallow or undemocratic, providing little opportunity for meaningful citizen involvement. Participatory citizenship models are frameworks that outline the criteria by which citizens to belong and participate in a society. This review aimed to identify how participatory citizenship is enabled through co-production.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of studies in which a participatory citizenship model informed co-production strategies in health research.

FINDINGS

Of 215 unique articles, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. Four aspects characteristic of how participatory citizenship models inform co-production in health research were identified. These were, Aspect (1) Co-production enables diverse citizens to participate in health research; Aspect (2) Citizens' lived-experience contextualises and shapes all stages of the health research process; Aspect (3) Co-production shares power and ownership between citizens and research teams; and, Aspect (4) Co-production through health research enables citizens to actively participate in the development of their communities. The first three aspects enable the fourth aspect to be fully enacted within a research project.

CONCLUSION

Citizenship-informed co-production ensures research enables local citizens to apply their lived-experience and local knowledge to shape community health and is valuable to policymakers and practitioners working to reduce health inequalities. Researchers are encouraged to engage with these four aspects through authentic co-production. The authors present a set of recommendations for researchers based on the findings of the synthesis.

摘要

背景

在过去二十年中,健康研究中的共同生产迅速增加,使公民能够塑造健康政策和实践。然而,共同生产可能是表面的或不民主的,几乎没有为公民有意义的参与提供机会。参与式公民模式是概述公民归属和参与社会的标准的框架。本综述旨在确定如何通过共同生产实现参与式公民身份。

方法

对参与式公民模式为健康研究中的共同生产策略提供信息的研究进行了系统综述。

结果

在215篇独特的文章中,有13篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入综合分析。确定了参与式公民模式为健康研究中的共同生产提供信息的四个特征方面。这些方面是:方面(1)共同生产使不同的公民能够参与健康研究;方面(2)公民的生活经历为健康研究过程的所有阶段提供背景并塑造这些阶段;方面(3)共同生产在公民和研究团队之间分享权力和所有权;方面(4)通过健康研究进行的共同生产使公民能够积极参与其社区的发展。前三个方面使第四个方面能够在研究项目中充分实施。

结论

以公民身份为导向的共同生产确保研究能够使当地公民应用他们的生活经历和当地知识来塑造社区健康,对致力于减少健康不平等的政策制定者和从业者具有价值。鼓励研究人员通过真正的共同生产参与这四个方面。作者根据综合分析的结果为研究人员提出了一系列建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3309/12365993/89c1b6978a50/HEX-28-e70394-g003.jpg

相似文献

2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.

本文引用的文献

1
Academic research values: Conceptualization and initial steps of scale development.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0318086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318086. eCollection 2025.
3
Equity, diversity, and inclusion in developmental neuroscience: Practical lessons from community-based participatory research.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2023 Mar 16;16:1007249. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.1007249. eCollection 2022.
4
5
NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e052832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052832.
8
Contours of citizen science: a vignette study.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Aug 25;8(8):202108. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202108. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Citizens defining citizenship: A model grounded in lived experience and its implications for research, policy and practice.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):e695-e705. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13440. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
10
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验