• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在准实验设计中评估压力性损伤预防策略的成本效益

Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of Pressure Injury Prevention Strategies in a Quasi-experimental Design.

作者信息

Asiri Mousa Yahya, Al Mutairi Turki Saqer J, Alanazi Homoud, Al-Ghareeb Sahar Abdulkarim

机构信息

Mousa Yahya Asiri, MSN, RN, is Head of Wound Care, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Turki Saqer J. Al Mutairi, PhD, RN, is Executive Director of Nursing Affairs, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Homoud Alanazi, MSN, RN, is Deputy Director of Nursing, Dental University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Sahar Abdulkarim Al-Ghareeb, MSN, RN, is Lecturer, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam,Saudi Arabia, and College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025 Sep 1;38(8):413-417. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000331. Epub 2025 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000331
PMID:40833508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12345810/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant challenge in healthcare, causing patient discomfort, prolonging hospital stays, and imposing substantial financial burdens on healthcare systems. Despite advancements in prevention strategies, determining the most cost-effective interventions remains paramount for healthcare providers and policymakers. The study authors aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of various PI prevention strategies within a quasi-experimental design framework.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study with 2 arms was conducted between September 2022 and February 2023 in a hospital in Saudi Arabia: the routine care for the PI group, group 1, and the PI prevention bundle group, group 2. Data on PI incidence, severity, and associated costs were collected to compare outcomes between group 1 and group 2.

RESULTS

A total of 368 patients were enrolled in the study: 218 patients in group 1 and 150 in group 2. Mortality was higher in the routine care group. The mean PI-free day in the prevention bundle group was 298.8 days compared with 19.7 days in the routine care group. Overall, the mean total cost for the bundle care group was ~$9600 lower than that of the routine care group.

CONCLUSIONS

This quasi-experimental study confirmed that PI prevention is cost-effective. Hospitals should invest in interdisciplinary teams and prevention bundles to improve patient outcomes and resource utilization.

摘要

目的

压疮(PIs)仍是医疗保健领域的一项重大挑战,会导致患者不适、延长住院时间,并给医疗系统带来巨大经济负担。尽管预防策略有所进步,但确定最具成本效益的干预措施对医疗服务提供者和政策制定者来说仍然至关重要。研究作者旨在评估准实验设计框架内各种压疮预防策略的成本效益。

方法

2022年9月至2023年2月在沙特阿拉伯的一家医院进行了一项双臂准实验研究:第1组为压疮组的常规护理,第2组为压疮预防综合措施组。收集了压疮发生率、严重程度和相关成本的数据,以比较第1组和第2组的结果。

结果

共有368名患者参与了该研究:第1组218名患者,第2组150名患者。常规护理组的死亡率更高。预防综合措施组的平均无压疮天数为298.8天,而常规护理组为19.7天。总体而言,综合护理组的平均总成本比常规护理组低约9600美元。

结论

这项准实验研究证实,压疮预防具有成本效益。医院应投资于跨学科团队和预防综合措施,以改善患者预后和资源利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c1/12345810/e7e11e6c7e7c/nsw-38-413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c1/12345810/e7e11e6c7e7c/nsw-38-413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c1/12345810/e7e11e6c7e7c/nsw-38-413-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of Pressure Injury Prevention Strategies in a Quasi-experimental Design.在准实验设计中评估压力性损伤预防策略的成本效益
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025 Sep 1;38(8):413-417. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000331. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults.成人压力性溃疡预防中的体位调整
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD009958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub2.
3
Incidence of pressure injuries and effectiveness of a prevention care bundle in critically ill Vietnamese patients: A prospective cohort study.
Aust Crit Care. 2025 Sep;38(5):101262. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101262. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
7
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
8
Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: an overview of Cochrane Reviews and network meta-analysis.预防和治疗压疮的床、垫板和床垫:Cochrane 综述和网络荟萃分析概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD013761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013761.pub2.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
The effect of pressure injury prevention care bundles on pressure injuries in hospital patients: A complex intervention systematic review and meta-analysis.压力性损伤预防护理包对医院患者压力性损伤的影响:一项复杂干预系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jul;155:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104768. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Pressure injury prevention measures: overview of systematic reviews.压力性损伤预防措施:系统评价综述。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 Dec 22;57:e20230039. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0039en. eCollection 2023.
2
Pressure injury prevention in the operating unit of a Swiss university hospital: a best practice implementation project.瑞士大学医院手术单元的压疮预防:最佳实践实施项目。
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Mar 1;21(1):46-57. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000341.
3
Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults: An abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.
成人压力性损伤预防的体位调整:一份 Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析摘要。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Aug;120:103976. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103976. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Nursing interventions for pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients: A systematic review.危重症患者压力性损伤预防的护理干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Aug;30(15-16):2151-2168. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15709. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Prevention of pressure injury in the operating room: Heels operating room pressure injury trial.手术室压力性损伤预防:足跟手术室压力性损伤试验。
Int Wound J. 2021 Jun;18(3):359-366. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13538. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Implementing a Pressure Injury Prevention Bundle to Decrease Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in an Adult Critical Care Unit: An Evidence-Based, Pilot Initiative.实施压力性损伤预防套件以降低成人重症监护病房的医院获得性压力性损伤:一项基于证据的试点计划。
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 Oct;66(10):20-28.
7
Barriers and enablers to implementation of pressure injury prevention in hospitalized adults: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2134-2139. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00265.
8
A quality improvement programme to reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries.一项旨在减少医院获得性压疮的质量改进计划。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000905.
9
The effectiveness of multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs in adult intensive care patients: A systematic review.多组分压力性损伤预防方案在成人重症监护患者中的效果:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103483. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103483. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
Reducing pressure ulcers across multiple care settings using a collaborative approach.采用协作方法减少多种护理环境中的压疮。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Aug 20;8(3):e000409. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000409. eCollection 2019.