Suppr超能文献

多房室剂量测定法用于重复经动脉放射性栓塞术的安全性

Safety of repeated trans-arterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.

作者信息

Soydal Cigdem, Demir Burak, Araz Mine, Mesci Irem, Çelebioğlu Emre Can, Kucuk Nuriye Ozlem

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanliurfa Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.

出版信息

Ann Nucl Med. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s12149-025-02094-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the local treatment options for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, our knowledge regarding the safety of repeated TARE remains limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of repeated transarterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed the data of the patients who were treated with at least two separate sessions of radioembolization with Y microspheres. Multi-compartment and voxel-wise dosimetry was performed for every treatment session and cumulative whole-liver normal tissue absorbed radiation dose (D), V20-V100 values for whole-liver normal tissue were calculated. Toxicity was assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading system for alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/bilirubin levels and International Normalized Ratio (INR) before and after each treatment. In addition, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores, grades, and changes in ALBI score (ΔALBI) were recorded. Difference between the ALBI scores before and after the treatment was compared with Wilcoxon tests, and relationships between ΔALBI and dosimetric variables were compared using linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (6 males, 18 females; median age: 57 years) were included in the analysis. The most common diagnosis was colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (46%). Seventeen patients (71%) underwent two TARE treatments, five (21%) underwent three, and two (8%) underwent four. The median interval between the first and second treatments was 138 days (range: 34-782), and between the second and third treatments was 210 days (range: 72-435). No CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. ALBI score analysis revealed no significant changes after the first two treatments, but a significant difference was noted after the third treatment (P = 0.043), with one patient progressing to ALBI Grade 3 with significant hypoalbuminemia. No significant relationship was found between ΔALBI and treatment intervals. ALT/AST elevations were mostly transient and mild, with only one case of Grade 2 hepatotoxicity in each of the first two treatments. In patients treated with glass microspheres in their first two treatments (n = 12), a significant linear correlation was found between cumulative D and ΔALBI (R = 0.512, P = 0.007). Cumulative dose-volume histogram parameters, particularly V30, V40, and V50, showed significant correlations with ΔALBI. However, in patients treated with resin microspheres (n = 6), no statistically significant relationship was observed between cumulative D and ΔALBI (P = 0.718).

CONCLUSION

Repeated TARE with a multi-compartment personalized dosimetric approach appears to be safe for the first two cycles, with limited low-grade toxicity. However, significant increase in ALBI scores after the third treatment was observed. ALBI score changes after second TARE were associated with cumulative liver radiation exposure in patients treated with glass microspheres. Larger studies are needed to further explore predictors of hepatotoxicity in repeated TARE.

摘要

目的

经动脉放射性栓塞术(TARE)是原发性和转移性肝肿瘤的局部治疗选择之一。然而,我们对重复TARE安全性的了解仍然有限。在本研究中,我们旨在通过多房室剂量测定法评估重复经动脉放射性栓塞术的安全性。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们分析了接受至少两次单独钇微球放射性栓塞治疗的患者数据。对每个治疗疗程进行多房室和体素剂量测定,并计算全肝正常组织累积吸收辐射剂量(D)、全肝正常组织的V20 - V100值。使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)分级系统评估每次治疗前后丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)/天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)/胆红素水平和国际标准化比值(INR)的毒性。此外,记录白蛋白 - 胆红素(ALBI)评分、分级以及ALBI评分变化(ΔALBI)。治疗前后ALBI评分的差异采用Wilcoxon检验进行比较,使用线性回归分析比较ΔALBI与剂量测定变量之间的关系。

结果

共有24例患者(6例男性,18例女性;中位年龄:57岁)纳入分析。最常见的诊断是结直肠癌肝转移(46%)。17例患者(71%)接受了两次TARE治疗,5例(21%)接受了三次,2例(8%)接受了四次。第一次和第二次治疗之间的中位间隔为138天(范围:34 - 782天),第二次和第三次治疗之间为210天(范围:72 - 435天)。未观察到CTCAE 3级或4级毒性。ALBI评分分析显示,前两次治疗后无显著变化,但第三次治疗后有显著差异(P = 0.043),1例患者进展为ALBI 3级伴严重低白蛋白血症。未发现ΔALBI与治疗间隔之间存在显著关系。ALT/AST升高大多为短暂性且轻微,前两次治疗中各有1例2级肝毒性病例。在前两次治疗中使用玻璃微球的患者(n = 12)中,累积D与ΔALBI之间存在显著线性相关性(R = 0.512,P = 0.007)。累积剂量 - 体积直方图参数,特别是V30、V40和V50,与ΔALBI显示出显著相关性。然而,在使用树脂微球治疗的患者(n = 6)中,累积D与ΔALBI之间未观察到统计学上的显著关系(P = 0.718)。

结论

采用多房室个性化剂量测定方法进行重复TARE在前两个周期似乎是安全的,低级别毒性有限。然而,第三次治疗后观察到ALBI评分显著增加。第二次TARE后ALBI评分变化与使用玻璃微球治疗的患者肝脏累积辐射暴露有关。需要更大规模的研究来进一步探索重复TARE中肝毒性的预测因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验