Guan Yu-Yao, Yang Jing, Qi Ying-Mei, Song Chao, Zheng Lei
Department of Pharmacy, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jinan Adverse Drug Reactions and Medical Device Adverse Event Monitoring Center, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 5;16:1529923. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1529923. eCollection 2025.
Pharmacologic agents with proposed neuroprotective properties are increasingly investigated; however, limited regulation and heterogeneous evidence raise concerns about their safety profiles. To establish a foundation for its safe clinical use, the data mining technology was used to investigate the safety warning signals of neuroprotective agent post-market approval.
The Jinan adverse event (AE) reporting system database was searched for AEs related to neuroprotective agents from January 2000 to March 2022. Basic information pertaining to patients, reports, and common AEs was analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the distribution of adverse reaction signals for each drug across different age groups and genders. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by stratifying patients based on concomitant medication use to evaluate the distribution of adverse reaction for each drug under different stratification conditions. Kaplan-Meier curves of time were used to analyze AEs for each drug. Four disproportionality analysis methods, namely, proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), were applied to obtain alert signals for this class of drugs. We further examined the presence of the detected signals on medicine labels in China and two developed countries (USA and Japan).
In total, 168,314 AEs were reported, of which 2,094 were associated with neuroprotective agents. Risk signals demonstrated significant variations across age groups, gender strata, and analyses with/without concomitant medication adjustments. For the following medications-citicoline sodium, troxerutin and cerebroprotein hydrolysate, vinpocetine, leaf extract, and cerebroprotein hydrolysate injection-50% of AEs occurred before the median time point. Using the PRR, ROR, MHRA, and BCPNN methods, 81, 57, and 68 signals were detected, respectively. Among the 81 signals, 30 AEs were not included on the drug labels used in China. Of these, 11 AEs were not included on the drug labels used in Japan; two AEs were included on the drug labels used in China but not in Japan.
The Jinan AE reporting system database used to mine warning signals can be used to analyze AEs after the marketing of neuroprotective agents, thereby reducing the risk associated with their clinical use.
具有潜在神经保护特性的药物正在受到越来越多的研究;然而,监管有限且证据参差不齐引发了人们对其安全性的担忧。为了为其安全临床应用奠定基础,采用数据挖掘技术调查神经保护剂上市后批准的安全警示信号。
在济南不良事件(AE)报告系统数据库中搜索2000年1月至2022年3月期间与神经保护剂相关的不良事件。分析了患者、报告和常见不良事件的基本信息。进行亚组分析以检查每种药物在不同年龄组和性别中的不良反应信号分布。通过根据合并用药情况对患者进行分层来进行敏感性分析,以评估每种药物在不同分层条件下的不良反应分布。使用时间的Kaplan-Meier曲线分析每种药物的不良事件。应用四种不成比例分析方法,即比例报告率(PRR)、报告比值比(ROR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和药品及保健品监管局(MHRA),来获取这类药物的警示信号。我们进一步检查了在中国以及两个发达国家(美国和日本)药品标签上是否存在检测到的信号。
总共报告了168314例不良事件,其中2094例与神经保护剂有关。风险信号在不同年龄组、性别层次以及有无合并用药调整的分析中表现出显著差异。对于以下药物——胞磷胆碱钠、曲克芦丁和脑蛋白水解物、长春西汀、叶提取物和脑蛋白水解物注射液——50%的不良事件发生在中位数时间点之前。使用PRR、ROR、MHRA和BCPNN方法分别检测到81、57和68个信号。在这81个信号中,30例不良事件未包含在中国使用的药品标签上。其中,11例不良事件未包含在日本使用的药品标签上;2例不良事件包含在中国使用的药品标签上但未包含在日本的药品标签上。
用于挖掘警示信号的济南不良事件报告系统数据库可用于分析神经保护剂上市后的不良事件,从而降低其临床使用相关风险。