Pereira Amanda Dos Santos, Johnson Khalilah Robinson, Magalhães Lilian
Amanda dos Santos Pereira, OT, is PhD Candidate, Department of Occupational Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil;
Khalilah Robinson Johnson, PhD, MS, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Am J Occup Ther. 2025 Sep 1;79(5). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2025.051068.
Globally, the occupational therapy profession has neglected to address the anti-Black racism in its therapeutic services. Although discussions on ethnic/racial issues have grown in the field in recent years, few studies have investigated the theoretical and methodological frameworks that inform the practices of occupational therapy practitioners who work with Black populations.
To describe and analyze the theoretical and methodological frameworks available to occupational therapy practitioners who provide services to Black populations.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for articles published in English and Portuguese from 2013 to 2024.
Scoping review procedures as outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were used to identify articles that reflect theoretical and methodological frameworks that guide the practices of occupational therapy practitioners who work with Black populations.
Forty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were organized into four themes: humanities and social sciences: theories and frameworks; occupation-centered approaches; addressing systemic inequalities through collective occupations, intersectionality, and the incorporation of Black epistemologies into occupational therapy practices; and methodological approaches.
Findings suggest that occupational therapy practitioners must adopt an antiracist approach with Black populations and be guided by counterhegemonic and decolonial frameworks. More studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness and limitations of frameworks that guide therapeutic practices with Black populations. Plain-Language Summary: This scoping review interrogates anti-Black racism in occupational therapy practice and the relevant frameworks available to occupational therapy practitioners working with Black populations around the world. The authors identify practice and research gaps that remain in the discourse and provide pathways for action that address the needs and demands of these populations from an antiracist lens. Positionality Statement: The authors are Black, cisgender, heterosexual, female-identifying occupational therapy practitioners and academic activists who engage in research and practice at the intersections of antiracism, gender, and ableism in occupational therapy and occupational science. The first and third authors live in different regions of Brazil and speak Portuguese. The first author is from a state in northeastern Brazil, which has the largest percentage of Black residents outside the African continent. The third author is from southeastern Brazil, a region with a significant percentage of White individuals. The second author is from the southern United States, is a native English speaker, and has practiced, taught, and conducted research with Black populations in the United States. These social markers shape how we do everyday life, being members of the Black community in our respective countries, belonging to an antiracist movement, and becoming transformative agents to change approaches to engaging with Black occupational therapy service recipients.
在全球范围内,职业治疗行业一直忽视在其治疗服务中解决反黑人种族主义问题。尽管近年来该领域关于种族问题的讨论有所增加,但很少有研究调查为与黑人患者合作的职业治疗从业者的实践提供指导的理论和方法框架。
描述和分析为黑人患者提供服务的职业治疗从业者可用的理论和方法框架。
检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、LILACS、SCIELO、科学引文索引和Scopus,以查找2013年至2024年以英文和葡萄牙文发表的文章。
采用了阿克西和奥马利(2005年)概述的范围审查程序以及系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目范围审查(PRISMA-ScR),以识别反映指导与黑人患者合作的职业治疗从业者实践的理论和方法框架的文章。
48篇文章符合纳入标准,并被组织成四个主题:人文和社会科学:理论和框架;以职业为中心的方法;通过集体职业、交叉性以及将黑人认识论纳入职业治疗实践来解决系统性不平等;以及方法学方法。
研究结果表明,职业治疗从业者必须对黑人患者采取反种族主义方法,并以反霸权和去殖民框架为指导。需要更多研究来调查指导与黑人患者进行治疗实践的框架的有效性和局限性。
本范围审查审视了职业治疗实践中的反黑人种族主义以及全球范围内与黑人患者合作的职业治疗从业者可用的相关框架。作者确定了该论述中仍然存在的实践和研究差距,并提供了从反种族主义角度满足这些人群需求和要求的行动途径。
作者是黑人、顺性别、异性恋、认同女性身份的职业治疗从业者和学术活动家,他们在职业治疗和职业科学中的反种族主义、性别和能力主义交叉领域进行研究和实践。第一作者和第三作者生活在巴西的不同地区,讲葡萄牙语。第一作者来自巴西东北部的一个州,该州是非洲大陆以外黑人居民比例最高的地区。第三作者来自巴西东南部,该地区白人比例很高。第二作者来自美国南部,以英语为母语,在美国与黑人患者一起实践、教学和开展研究。这些社会特征塑造了我们作为各自国家黑人社区的成员、反种族主义运动的一员以及成为改变与黑人职业治疗服务接受者互动方式的变革推动者的日常生活方式。