Suppr超能文献

育雏期间的深色育雏器会影响肉鸡的恐惧程度,但不会影响其生产性能参数。

Dark brooders during rearing affect fearfulness but not production parameters of broiler chickens.

作者信息

Forslind Sara, Leishman Emily M, Hernandez Carlos E, Riber Anja B, Wall Helena, Wattrang Eva, Blokhuis Harry J

机构信息

Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2025 Aug 13;104(11):105682. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105682.

Abstract

Dark brooders are often suggested as enrichment for broiler chickens because they promote natural motivated behaviors compared to conventional barren environments in broiler production. Although the use of brooders is thought to convey benefits for animal welfare, it is not well described how they might affect parameters related to production and health. The objective of this study was to investigate if providing dark brooders affects production, health, behavior, and welfare compared to a control group without dark brooders. Six pens of each treatment were used, keeping 60 mixed-sex chickens (Ross 308) per pen for a full rearing period of 35 days. Data on growth, mortality, gait score, litter quality, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV)-specific antibody titers, and fearfulness were collected. There were no differences in BW at day 35 (brooders: 2857.3 ± 40.8 g, control: 2831.9 ± 39.6 g, p = 0.55) or feed conversion ratio (FCR) (brooders: 1.44, control: 1.45, P = 0.87). Nor were there any differences in mortality, gait score, or litter quality (P > 0.05). However, birds reared with brooders showed lower IBV titers compared to the control at 15 days after vaccination (P = 0.0448), although there were no other differences between treatments at 0, 22, or 29 days after vaccination. Chickens reared with dark brooders were less fearful as shown by shorter latency to first head movement in the tonic immobility test (brooders: 197.2 ± 15.9 s, control: 307.6 ± 17.9 s, P = 0.0002), shorter latency to turn itself around in tonic immobility test (brooders: 234 ± 19.7 s, control: 351 ± 29.5 s, P = 0.0012), more chickens near the object in the novel object test (brooders: 2.6 ± 0.25 birds, control: 1.5 ± 0.16 birds, P < 0.0001), and more chickens near the observer in the adapted touch test (brooders: 9.8 ± 0.28 birds, control: 4.8 ± 0.28 birds, P < 0.0001). The results of this study indicate that the use of dark brooders does not affect production or health of broiler chickens, however, birds with brooders were less fearful. Fear is a negative emotion and thus reducing fear should increase bird welfare. Therefore, dark brooders may be a useful tool to increase broiler welfare without negatively affecting production or health.

摘要

深色育雏器常被建议用于肉鸡养殖,因为与肉鸡生产中传统的贫瘠环境相比,它们能促进自然的激发性行为。尽管使用育雏器被认为能给动物福利带来益处,但关于它们如何影响与生产和健康相关的参数,目前尚无详细描述。本研究的目的是调查与没有深色育雏器的对照组相比,提供深色育雏器是否会影响肉鸡的生产、健康、行为和福利。每种处理使用六个鸡舍,每个鸡舍饲养60只混性别鸡(罗斯308),整个饲养期为35天。收集了关于生长、死亡率、步态评分、垫料质量、传染性支气管炎病毒(IBV)特异性抗体滴度和恐惧程度的数据。在第35天,体重(育雏器组:2857.3±40.8克,对照组:2831.9±39.6克,p = 0.55)或饲料转化率(FCR)(育雏器组:1.44,对照组:1.45,P = 0.87)没有差异。死亡率、步态评分或垫料质量也没有差异(P>0.05)。然而,与对照组相比,在接种疫苗后15天,使用育雏器饲养的鸡的IBV滴度较低(P = 0.0448),尽管在接种疫苗后0、22或29天,各处理之间没有其他差异。在强直静止试验中,使用深色育雏器饲养的鸡恐惧程度较低,表现为首次头部移动的潜伏期较短(育雏器组:197.2±15.9秒,对照组:307.6±17.9秒,P = 0.0002),在强直静止试验中转身的潜伏期较短(育雏器组:234±19.7秒,对照组:351±29.5秒,P = 0.0012),在新物体试验中靠近物体的鸡更多(育雏器组:2.6±0.25只鸡,对照组:1.5±0.16只鸡,P<0.0001),在适应性触摸试验中靠近观察者的鸡更多(育雏器组:9.8±0.28只鸡,对照组:4.8±0.28只鸡,P<0.0001)。本研究结果表明,使用深色育雏器不会影响肉鸡的生产或健康,然而,使用育雏器的鸡恐惧程度较低。恐惧是一种负面情绪,因此减少恐惧应该会提高鸡的福利。因此,深色育雏器可能是一种有用的工具,可提高肉鸡福利,而不会对生产或健康产生负面影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验