Silvestri Frédéric, Kumar Abhishek, Christidis Maria, Grigoriadis Anastasios
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, ADES, CNRS, EFS, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4064, 141 04 Huddinge, Alfred Nobels Allé 8, Huddinge, Sweden.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1350. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06708-6.
The study aimed to evaluate gaze behavior during tooth preparation assessments by analyzing and comparing eye-tracking metrics between novice and expert groups.
Thirty-five participants, divided into novices (n = 18, mean age = 22.9 ± 1.5 years) and experts (n = 17, mean age = 44.3 ± 13.1 years), were recruited for this observational study. The novice group consisted of third-year dental students, while the expert group comprised licensed dentists with an average of 18.9 ± 12.7 years of clinical experience. Eye-tracking metrics, including total duration of fixation (TDF), number of fixations (NF), time to first fixation (TFF), and pupil size, were measured across different areas of interest (AOIs). The data was analyzed with a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.
Both novices and experts focused mainly on the "buccal wall" and "margin" (finishing line) AOIs during tooth preparation evaluation. The novices showed significantly longer TDF (P = 0.034), more NF (P = 0.047), and longer TFF (P = 0.021) compared to experts. However, there were no significant differences in pupil diameter between groups or AOIs, indicating similar cognitive load despite differences in visual behavior.
Overall, the novices tend to have longer fixation durations, more frequent fixations, and a delayed time to first fixation compared to experts during tooth preparation assessments. The study also concludes that both novices and experts primarily focus on the buccal wall and finishing line. These differences indicate that visual processing varies between the two groups, with novices demonstrating less efficient visual processing skills. In general, the findings highlight how experience influences gaze behavior in the assessment of tooth preparation.
These findings can refine pre-clinical prosthodontic education by fostering expert-like visual processing skills, enabling students to better understand and perform prosthodontic tasks. This targeted approach enhances their training and prepares them more effectively for clinical practice.
本研究旨在通过分析和比较新手组与专家组的眼动指标,评估牙齿预备评估过程中的注视行为。
招募了35名参与者,分为新手组(n = 18,平均年龄 = 22.9 ± 1.5岁)和专家组(n = 17,平均年龄 = 44.3 ± 13.1岁)进行这项观察性研究。新手组由三年级牙科学生组成,而专家组由平均有18.9 ± 12.7年临床经验的执业牙医组成。在不同的感兴趣区域(AOI)测量眼动指标,包括总注视持续时间(TDF)、注视次数(NF)、首次注视时间(TFF)和瞳孔大小。数据采用双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)模型进行分析。
在牙齿预备评估过程中,新手和专家主要关注“颊壁”和“边缘”(终止线)AOI。与专家相比,新手的TDF显著更长(P = 0.034),NF更多(P = 0.047),TFF更长(P = 0.021)。然而,两组之间或AOI之间的瞳孔直径没有显著差异,表明尽管视觉行为存在差异,但认知负荷相似。
总体而言,在牙齿预备评估过程中,新手与专家相比往往有更长的注视持续时间、更频繁的注视和延迟的首次注视时间。该研究还得出结论,新手和专家主要关注颊壁和终止线。这些差异表明两组之间的视觉处理方式不同,新手的视觉处理技能效率较低。总的来说,研究结果突出了经验在牙齿预备评估中对注视行为的影响。
这些发现可以通过培养类似专家的视觉处理技能来完善临床前口腔修复学教育,使学生能够更好地理解和执行口腔修复任务。这种有针对性的方法可以加强他们的培训,并使他们更有效地为临床实践做好准备。