Giesche Florian, Peskar Manca, Šlosar Luka, Šimunič Boštjan, Pišot Rado, Marusic Uros
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Division of Preventive and Sports Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 22;15(1):30828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16643-9.
Evidence suggests athletes with lower baseline cognitive performance are at higher risk of musculoskeletal injuries. This prospective cohort study investigates basic and executive cognitive functions in predicting injuries in 78 professional male football (soccer) players from four Slovenian first league teams. Data were collected during the 2018/2019 winter break, and injuries recorded in the second half of that and the 2019/2020 season. Cognitive functions assessed by computerized tests (PsyToolkit) included psychomotor vigilance (simple, choice reaction time) and visuospatial memory (Corsi-block-tapping-test), while pen-and-paper tests assessed motor speed, visual scanning, and executive functions (TMT; Delis-Kaplan-Executive-Function-System). Forty-two players sustained at least one musculoskeletal injury (9 contact injuries), 36 remained injury-free. Logistic regression analyses indicated that none of the cognitive measures significantly influenced injury occurrence (p > 0.05). However, non-significant trends were observed for the TMT ratio score (p = 0.065, OR = 1.64), reflecting cognitive flexibility, and for TMT-A (p = 0.05, OR = 0.60), reflecting visual scanning. Specifically, players with lower cognitive flexibility showed a 64% increase in the odds of sustaining an injury, while better visual scanning performance was associated with a 40% reduction in injury odds. No significant association was found between basic or executive cognitive functions and musculoskeletal injuries in professional male football players. However, a non-significant trend suggested that lower cognitive flexibility may be associated with increased injury risk. These findings underscore the need for larger studies to better clarify the role of executive functions in assessing injury risk in football.
有证据表明,基线认知表现较低的运动员发生肌肉骨骼损伤的风险更高。这项前瞻性队列研究调查了来自四支斯洛文尼亚顶级联赛球队的78名职业男性足球运动员的基本认知功能和执行认知功能对损伤的预测情况。数据收集于2018/2019年冬歇期,损伤记录于该赛季下半年以及2019/2020赛季。通过计算机测试(PsyToolkit)评估的认知功能包括心理运动警觉性(简单反应时间、选择反应时间)和视觉空间记忆(Corsi方块敲击测试),而纸笔测试评估运动速度、视觉扫描和执行功能(连线测验;德利斯-卡普兰执行功能系统)。42名球员至少发生了一次肌肉骨骼损伤(9次接触性损伤),36名球员未受伤。逻辑回归分析表明,没有一项认知指标对损伤发生有显著影响(p>0.05)。然而,在反映认知灵活性的连线测验比率得分(p = 0.065,OR = 1.64)和反映视觉扫描的连线测验A(p = 0.05,OR = 0.60)方面观察到了不显著的趋势。具体而言,认知灵活性较低的球员受伤几率增加了64%,而更好的视觉扫描表现与受伤几率降低40%相关。在职业男性足球运动员中,未发现基本认知功能或执行认知功能与肌肉骨骼损伤之间存在显著关联。然而,一个不显著的趋势表明,较低的认知灵活性可能与受伤风险增加有关。这些发现强调需要进行更大规模的研究,以更好地阐明执行功能在评估足球运动员损伤风险中的作用。