• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钬激光与等离子技术在非肌层浸润性膀胱癌手术治疗中的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of holmium laser versus plasma techniques in the surgical management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Dong, Xu Jia-Neng, Chen Han-Kai, Ren Qiang, Li Yu-Min

机构信息

Department of Urology, Jiashan First People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1625901. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1625901. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1625901
PMID:40842591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364660/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy of Holmium Laser and Plasma Techniques in treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), focusing on surgical duration, safety, and tumor recurrence.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we included randomized controlled trials that directly compared Holmium Laser and Plasma Techniques in NMIBC treatment. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool assessed study quality, and statistical analyses were conducted using fixed-effect or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were also performed.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 1158 potentially relevant articles, with 8 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. The analysis showed no significant difference in surgical duration between the two techniques. However, the Holmium Laser was associated with a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative bladder perforation (RR=0.10, P<0.001) and a reduced short-term tumor recurrence rate (RR=0.65, P<0.01). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Holmium Laser provides safer outcomes and better efficacy in reducing postoperative tumor recurrence compared to Plasma Techniques in NMIBC management.

摘要

背景

本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了钬激光和等离子技术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的疗效,重点关注手术时间、安全性和肿瘤复发情况。

方法

遵循PRISMA指南,我们纳入了直接比较钬激光和等离子技术治疗NMIBC的随机对照试验。采用Cochrane协作网工具评估研究质量,并根据异质性使用固定效应或随机效应模型进行统计分析。还进行了敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估。

结果

我们的检索共获得1158篇可能相关的文章,其中8项研究符合纳入标准。分析表明,两种技术在手术时间上无显著差异。然而,钬激光与术中膀胱穿孔发生率显著降低(RR = 0.10,P < 0.001)和短期肿瘤复发率降低(RR = 0.65,P < 0.01)相关。敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性,未检测到显著的发表偏倚。

结论

在NMIBC治疗中,与等离子技术相比,钬激光在减少术后肿瘤复发方面具有更安全的结果和更好的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/1ccd33aa26b7/fonc-15-1625901-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/ad41f89b921b/fonc-15-1625901-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/304955dd1d12/fonc-15-1625901-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/2a2b6b16e424/fonc-15-1625901-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/368adfcf1ff2/fonc-15-1625901-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/b68e2326c29d/fonc-15-1625901-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/0399499dcd14/fonc-15-1625901-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/1ccd33aa26b7/fonc-15-1625901-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/ad41f89b921b/fonc-15-1625901-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/304955dd1d12/fonc-15-1625901-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/2a2b6b16e424/fonc-15-1625901-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/368adfcf1ff2/fonc-15-1625901-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/b68e2326c29d/fonc-15-1625901-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/0399499dcd14/fonc-15-1625901-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eab/12364660/1ccd33aa26b7/fonc-15-1625901-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of holmium laser versus plasma techniques in the surgical management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.钬激光与等离子技术在非肌层浸润性膀胱癌手术治疗中的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1625901. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1625901. eCollection 2025.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin with interferon-alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.卡介苗联合α干扰素膀胱灌注与单纯卡介苗膀胱灌注治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD012112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012112.pub2.
6
Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.膀胱内注射吉西他滨治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD009294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009294.pub2.
7
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
8
Efficacy and safety of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.激光消融治疗复发性藏毛窦的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb 19;40(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04832-x.
9
Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): a systematic review.经尿道膀胱内吉西他滨治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC):系统评价。
BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(4):496-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10880.x.
10
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC) combined immunotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center real-world study.新辅助地西他滨维托辛(RC48-ADC)联合免疫疗法治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的疗效及生物标志物分析:一项多中心真实世界研究
Imeta. 2025 Apr 14;4(3):e70033. doi: 10.1002/imt2.70033. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparison of holmium laser, bipolar and conventional monopolar transurethral resection of bladder tumour in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.钬激光、双极与传统单极经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Apr;73(Suppl 4)(4):S251-S256. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.EGY-S4-50.
3
Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Side-by-Side Guideline Comparison.
非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌:指南并排比较。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):954-956. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
4
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and combination therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center real-world retrospective study.新辅助免疫治疗、化疗和联合治疗在肌层浸润性膀胱癌中的应用:一项多中心真实世界回顾性研究。
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Nov 15;3(11):100785. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100785. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
5
Long-term outcomes of outpatient laser ablation for recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective cohort study.复发性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌门诊激光消融的长期疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Oct 13;3(2):124-129. doi: 10.1002/bco2.120. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Laser technology in urologic oncology.激光技术在泌尿肿瘤学中的应用。
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):338-346. doi: 10.1177/03915603221088721. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
7
Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的处理方法。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2021 Jul 16;23(9):105. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01091-1.
8
Holmium LASER in Comparison with Transurethral Resection of the Bladder Tumor for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Randomized Clinical Trial with 18-month Follow-up.钬激光与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较:18个月随访的随机临床试验
Urol J. 2021 Apr 11;18(4):460-465. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6319.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Holmium Laser En-bloc Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors for Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.钬激光整块切除术与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的随机临床试验。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1035-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 30.