Ahmed Hassan
Internal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, King's Lynn, GBR.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):e88413. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88413. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, recently passed at the House of Commons, aims to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill adults with six months or less to live in England and Wales. While framed as a compassionate reform promoting autonomy and dignity, legalising assisted dying amidst widespread underfunding of palliative care risks institutionalising inequity and pressuring vulnerable patients towards premature death. The systemic failures, ranging from inconsistent end-of-life care access to limited psychological and logistical safeguards, undermine the notion of true choice. Moreover, assisted dying introduces moral strain for clinicians, potential biases in eligibility decisions, and long-term risks of legislative expansion. Until universal, high-quality palliative care is guaranteed, the bill may function less as a humane option and more as a symptom of an overstretched, under-resourced health system failing its most vulnerable.
《晚期成年患者(生命末期)法案》近期在下议院获得通过,旨在使在英格兰和威尔士患有绝症且预计寿命不足六个月的成年患者的协助死亡合法化。尽管该法案被视为一项促进自主权和尊严的人道改革,但在姑息治疗普遍资金不足的情况下将协助死亡合法化,可能会使不公平现象制度化,并迫使弱势患者过早死亡。从临终护理服务获取不一致到心理和后勤保障有限等系统性失灵,破坏了真正选择的概念。此外,协助死亡给临床医生带来道德压力,在资格判定中可能存在偏见,以及立法扩张的长期风险。在确保提供普遍、高质量的姑息治疗之前,该法案可能与其说是一种人道选择,不如说是一个不堪重负、资源匮乏的医疗系统未能照顾好最弱势群体的症状。