Usman Abdulmumini, Olu Olushayo Oluseun, Kakay Mohamed, Ba Ndoungou Salla, Kabore Patrick, Kulausa Hyelni, Chanda Emmanuel, Gasasira Alex, Cabore Joseph
World Health Organization African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
World Health Organization Country Office, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;13:1559742. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1559742. eCollection 2025.
Effective health sector coordination is essential to improve the implementation of development and humanitarian response programmes in the WHO African Region. In recent years, multiple efforts have been deployed to strengthen coordination mechanisms, with uneven progress depending on the national context. Nevertheless, important challenges remain. In many cases, mechanisms remain fragmented, coordination platforms often operate in isolation, and resources are not always used efficiently. In certain settings, current cooperation models may hinder the long-term sustainability of progress, and there is a need to foster greater synergy among the actors involved. Strengthening national capacities and promoting coordination that better responds to realities on the ground therefore remain critical priorities on the continent. While several studies have assessed coordination mechanisms in individual countries, a regional overview has been lacking. This study thus aimed to examine the current status and characteristics of health sector coordination mechanisms and the role of WHO in health coordination across the 47 member states of the WHO African Region. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between 2017 and 2019 using a mixed-methods approach, including document reviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. The findings revealed that only 9 member states (23%) had a functioning central health sector coordination platform, all of which had signed the IHP + compact and adopted the Sector-Wide Approach. Nearly half (47%) lacked a central platform, despite 41% hosting a significant number of development partners and 36% having signed the IHP+. Sixteen member states (34%) operated multiple fragmented, programme-specific coordination mechanisms with minimal linkage to any overarching platform, despite most of them (81%) being IHP + signatories. In eight member states, parallel humanitarian and development coordination systems coexisted. Coordination was identified by stakeholders as one of the top five priorities for WHO support. Based on these findings, five key recommendations are proposed: strengthening national coordination capacities; streamlining multiple coordination mechanisms; addressing coordination challenges in protracted crisis settings; clearly defining WHO's coordination role in line with partner expectations; and providing context-specific support across core health system functions. Collective efforts from all stakeholders are essential to accelerate the implementation of these recommendations, thereby enhancing health governance, improving aid effectiveness, and advancing progress towarduniversal health coverage in the region.
有效的卫生部门协调对于改善世卫组织非洲区域发展和人道主义应对计划的实施至关重要。近年来,已开展多项努力来加强协调机制,但进展参差不齐,具体情况因国家而异。尽管如此,仍存在重大挑战。在许多情况下,机制仍然分散,协调平台往往孤立运作,资源使用效率不高。在某些情况下,当前的合作模式可能会阻碍进展的长期可持续性,因此需要促进相关行为体之间形成更大的协同效应。加强国家能力并推动能更好地应对实地实际情况的协调,仍然是非洲大陆的关键优先事项。虽然有几项研究评估了个别国家的协调机制,但缺乏区域层面的概述。因此,本研究旨在考察世卫组织非洲区域47个成员国卫生部门协调机制的现状和特点,以及世卫组织在卫生协调中的作用。2017年至2019年期间采用混合方法开展了一项描述性横断面研究,包括文件审查、关键信息人士访谈和焦点小组讨论。研究结果显示,只有9个成员国(23%)设有运作正常的中央卫生部门协调平台,所有这些国家都签署了国际卫生伙伴关系+(IHP+)契约并采用了全部门办法。近半数国家(47%)缺乏中央平台,尽管41%的国家有大量发展伙伴,36%的国家签署了国际卫生伙伴关系+。16个成员国(34%)运作着多个分散的、针对具体项目的协调机制,与任何总体平台的联系极少,尽管其中大多数国家(81%)是国际卫生伙伴关系+签署国。在8个成员国中,人道主义和发展协调系统并行存在。利益攸关方将协调确定为世卫组织提供支持的五大优先事项之一。基于这些发现,提出了五项关键建议:加强国家协调能力;精简多个协调机制;应对长期危机局势中的协调挑战;根据伙伴期望明确界定世卫组织的协调作用;并针对核心卫生系统职能提供因地制宜的支持。所有利益攸关方的共同努力对于加速这些建议的实施至关重要,从而加强卫生治理、提高援助实效并推动该区域在全民健康覆盖方面取得进展。