• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与理想心脏供体脑死亡后捐赠相比,循环死亡后捐赠的心脏移植利用率

Heart Allograft Utilization Rates Following Donation After Circulatory Death Compared to Donation After Brain Death in the Ideal Heart Donor.

作者信息

Nasher Nayeem, Rahimov Daler, Macmillan T Reese, Siddique Faizaan, Rame J Eduardo, Eisen Howard J, Alvarez Rene J, Rajagopal Keshava, Entwistle John W, Tchantchaleishvili Vakhtang

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2025 Aug;39(8):e70266. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70266.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.70266
PMID:40844484
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of heart allografts obtained from donation after circulatory death (DCD) remains low, especially compared to donation after brain death (DBD). Our study aimed to identify factors associated with the underutilization of hearts in ideal donors.

METHODS

Patient-level data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for all adult deceased donors who underwent organ procurement and subsequent transplantation between January 2020 and December 2023. "Ideal" DCD donors were analyzed as a separate subset and compared with ideal DBD donors. Transplantation rates, along with associated factors, were assessed.

RESULTS

The rate of heart allograft utilization was 6.9% in DCD donors compared to 35.4% among DBD donors (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of ideal donors demonstrated that 41% of DCD donors were utilized for heart transplantation compared to 85% of DBD donors (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis for heart utilization demonstrated that interventions, including extracorporeal life support (odds ratio [OR] 7.48, 95% CI 4.72-12.35) and coronary angiography (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.76-4.39), were independent predictors of utilization. There was no significant association with hypertension (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.52-1.06), tobacco use (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.47-1.06), or BMI (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.01) in the ideal DCD donor. Regional variation in donor heart utilization rates was observed.

CONCLUSION

There remains a significant portion of ideal DCD donors whose hearts remain unutilized. Identifying and addressing factors related to underutilization may improve organ yield.

摘要

背景

与脑死亡后捐赠(DBD)相比,循环死亡后捐赠(DCD)获得的心脏移植数量仍然较低。我们的研究旨在确定理想供体中心脏未充分利用的相关因素。

方法

从器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库中获取了2020年1月至2023年12月期间所有接受器官获取及后续移植的成年已故供体的患者层面数据。“理想”的DCD供体作为一个单独的子集进行分析,并与理想的DBD供体进行比较。评估了移植率及相关因素。

结果

DCD供体的心脏移植利用率为6.9%,而DBD供体为35.4%(p<0.001)。理想供体的亚组分析表明,41%的DCD供体心脏用于心脏移植,而DBD供体为85%(p<0.001)。心脏利用的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,包括体外生命支持(比值比[OR]7.48,95%可信区间4.72-12.35)和冠状动脉造影(OR 2.77,95%可信区间1.76-4.39)在内的干预措施是利用的独立预测因素。在理想的DCD供体中,与高血压(OR 0.75,95%可信区间0.52-1.06)、吸烟(OR 0.71,95%可信区间0.47-1.06)或体重指数(OR 0.99,95%可信区间0.97-1.01)无显著关联。观察到供体心脏利用率的区域差异。

结论

仍有相当一部分理想的DCD供体心脏未被利用。识别和解决与未充分利用相关的因素可能会提高器官产量。

相似文献

1
Heart Allograft Utilization Rates Following Donation After Circulatory Death Compared to Donation After Brain Death in the Ideal Heart Donor.与理想心脏供体脑死亡后捐赠相比,循环死亡后捐赠的心脏移植利用率
Clin Transplant. 2025 Aug;39(8):e70266. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70266.
2
Superior Waitlist Outcomes Among Patients Listed for Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation.循环性死亡后心脏移植登记患者中等待名单上的优越结局。
JACC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;13(8):102495. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.03.039. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Donation After Circulatory Death Lung Use.胸腹常温区域灌注与循环死亡后供肺的使用
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460033. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60033.
4
Early Outcomes of Primary Graft Dysfunction Comparing Donation After Circulatory and Brain Death Heart Transplantation: An Analysis of the UNOS Registry.比较心脏循环性死亡后捐献与脑死亡后捐献心脏移植的原发性移植物功能障碍早期结局:器官共享联合网络登记处分析
Clin Transplant. 2025 Jul;39(7):e70222. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70222.
5
The United Kingdom's experience of controlled donation after circulatory death direct procurement of lungs with concomitant abdominal normothermic regional perfusion with an analysis of short-term outcomes.英国循环性死亡后器官捐献直接获取肺脏并同时进行腹部常温区域灌注的经验及短期结果分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Aug;44(8):1307-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.03.019. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
6
Direct procurement with machine perfusion and normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation.心脏死亡后供体心脏移植中机器灌注和常温区域灌注的直接获取
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.033.
7
Normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death compared with brain dead donors: Single-center cardiac allograft outcomes.与脑死亡供体相比,心脏死亡后器官捐献中的常温局部灌注:单中心心脏移植结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Aug;170(2):585-593.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.02.023. Epub 2025 May 4.
8
Hepatitis C-positive grafts for hepatitis C-negative recipients in liver transplantation: Buried treasure or depleting resource?肝移植中丙型肝炎病毒阳性供肝用于丙型肝炎病毒阴性受者:是宝藏还是消耗性资源?
Liver Transpl. 2025 Sep 1;31(9):1154-1164. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000557. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
9
Sex Differences in Utilization of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors for Heart Transplantation and Associated Outcomes.心脏移植中循环死亡后器官捐献供体利用情况及相关结果的性别差异。
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;18(8):e012835. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.012835. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
10
A cost comparison of liver acquisition fees for donation after circulatory death versus donation after brain death donors.脑死亡供体与循环死亡供体肝获取费的成本比较。
Liver Transpl. 2024 Aug 1;30(8):775-784. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000328. Epub 2024 Jan 9.