Wang Yan, Niu Yutian, Xu Rongjing, Zhang Qingqing, Jia Shoumei, Wang Anni
School of Nursing, Fudan University, No.305 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China, 86 13467620600.
GuiYang Healthcare Vocational University, Guiyang, China.
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Aug 22;14:e69640. doi: 10.2196/69640.
Electronic resources have become a predominant modality for health information dissemination in recent years. eHealth literacy (eHL) means individuals' competencies to effectively acquire and use health information from electronic sources. Enhancing eHL is thus essential to facilitate individuals' effective engagement with electronic resources and promote improved health management.
This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of eHL interventions, thereby providing a reference for future intervention strategies.
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang Data, and Sino Med limited to Chinese and English-language studies published before August 2024 was conducted. The interventional studies included had the explicit primary objective of enhancing eHL. We also incorporated studies that assessed eHL as a secondary outcome or mediator influencing health behaviors or clinical outcomes. All publications were required to provide publicly accessible complete datasets. We excluded conference abstracts and protocols. Academic theses and dissertations were included if they underwent institutional quality assurance through rigorous academic review processes and met predefined eligibility criteria.
A total of 35 studies were included in this review. The most prevalent eHL interventions (12/35, 34%) were delivered via mobile apps and devices in various settings, including educational institutions, public spaces, health care facilities, and community centers. These interventions predominantly focused on enhancing information literacy, health literacy, and computer literacy across the 6 domains of eHL: traditional, health, information, scientific, media, and computer literacy. A majority of the interventions were conducted on a weekly basis (6/13, 46%) and had a duration of 24 weeks (6/35, 17%). However, 77% (27/35) of interventions did not assess long-term effects. The primary outcomes of eHL interventions encompassed perceived eHL, actual eHealth knowledge and skills, health literacy, health behavior, and clinical outcomes, with 86% (30/35) indicating positive effects. The eHealth Literacy Scale was the most frequently used assessment tool.
This study synthesizes the characteristics of eHL interventions. Current eHL interventions exhibit limitations in theoretical grounding, longitudinal tracking, and traditional or media literacy components. Overreliance on self-reported metrics constrains validity assessment. Future work should strengthen theoretical frameworks, integrate objective metrics, and enhance longitudinal designs.
近年来,电子资源已成为健康信息传播的主要方式。电子健康素养(eHL)是指个人有效获取和使用来自电子来源的健康信息的能力。因此,提高电子健康素养对于促进个人与电子资源的有效互动以及改善健康管理至关重要。
本范围综述旨在综合电子健康素养干预措施的特点,从而为未来的干预策略提供参考。
全面检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、ProQuest、CINAHL、中国知网、维普资讯、万方数据和中国生物医学文献数据库,仅限于2024年8月之前发表的中英文研究。纳入的干预性研究明确的主要目标是提高电子健康素养。我们还纳入了将电子健康素养作为影响健康行为或临床结果的次要结果或中介进行评估的研究。所有出版物都要求提供可公开获取的完整数据集。我们排除了会议摘要和方案。学术论文和学位论文如果经过严格的学术评审过程并符合预定义的纳入标准,则纳入研究。
本综述共纳入35项研究。最常见的电子健康素养干预措施(12/35,34%)是通过移动应用程序和设备在各种环境中实施的,包括教育机构、公共场所、医疗机构和社区中心。这些干预措施主要侧重于在电子健康素养的6个领域提高信息素养、健康素养和计算机素养:传统素养、健康素养、信息素养、科学素养、媒体素养和计算机素养。大多数干预措施每周进行一次(6/13,46%),持续时间为24周(6/35,17%)。然而,77%(27/35)的干预措施未评估长期效果。电子健康素养干预措施的主要结果包括感知电子健康素养、实际电子健康知识和技能、健康素养、健康行为和临床结果,86%(30/35)表明有积极效果。电子健康素养量表是最常用的评估工具。
本研究综合了电子健康素养干预措施的特点。当前的电子健康素养干预措施在理论基础、纵向跟踪以及传统或媒体素养组成部分方面存在局限性。过度依赖自我报告的指标限制了有效性评估。未来的工作应加强理论框架,整合客观指标,并加强纵向设计。