Bartels Claudia, Tzu-Yueh Chen Joy, Belz Michael, Yakupov Renat, Düzel Emrah, Glanz Wenzel, Lüsebrink Falk, Dechent Peter, Kleineidam Luca, Stark Melina, Spottke Annika, Coenjaerts Marie, Fließbach Klaus, Schneider Anja, Rostamzadeh Ayda, Jessen Frank, H Schott Björn, Wiltfang Jens, Frommann Ingo, Wagner Michael, Goya-Maldonado Roberto
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, D-37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Laboratory of Systems Neuroscience and Imaging in Psychiatry (SNIP-Lab), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025 Aug 22;17(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01833-4.
Long-term retrieval (LTR) and accelerated long-term forgetting (ALF) paradigms might help differentiating individuals at increased dementia risk from healthy controls (HC).
We investigated the utility of a LTR paradigm in discriminating subjective cognitive decline (SCD) from HC and its relationship to the CA1 body volume, a hippocampal structure pivotal to the memory circuitry.
LTR was assessed via recall rates of the ADAS-cog word list and the FCSRT-IR free recall in 59 DELCODE study participants, including individuals with SCD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as well as HC, all of them DELCODE study participants. LTR performance was compared between groups and its discriminability between SCD and HC was assessed using ROC curve analysis. 32 SCD and HC participants had FreeSurfer-segmented MRI data, and hippocampal subfield volumes were correlated with LTR rates.
Only FCSRT-IR LTR rates sufficiently differentiated SCD from HC (AUC of 0.701; 95% CI 0.537-0.865). Moderate associations of the FCSRT-IR LTR rate with CA1 bodies in both hemispheres (left CA1 body r = 0.419, p = 0.017; right: r = 0.412, p = 0.019), in addition to the left C3 body were observed (r = 0.525, p = 0.002).
LTR may constitute a potential indicator of memory circuitry integrity in older adults, which is also mirrored by its association with CA1 volume. Thus, assessment of LTR and associated neural circuits may help to better identify individuals at risk for future cognitive decline today indistinguishable from HC, ultimately paving the way for early intervention.
长期记忆提取(LTR)和加速长期遗忘(ALF)范式可能有助于区分痴呆风险增加的个体与健康对照(HC)。
我们研究了LTR范式在区分主观认知下降(SCD)与HC中的效用及其与CA1体体积的关系,CA1体是记忆回路中关键的海马结构。
通过ADAS-cog单词列表的回忆率和FCSRT-IR自由回忆对59名DELCODE研究参与者进行LTR评估,包括患有SCD和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的个体以及HC,他们均为DELCODE研究参与者。比较各组之间的LTR表现,并使用ROC曲线分析评估其在SCD和HC之间的可辨别性。32名SCD和HC参与者有FreeSurfer分割的MRI数据,海马亚区体积与LTR率相关。
只有FCSRT-IR LTR率能够充分区分SCD与HC(AUC为0.701;95%CI为0.537 - 0.865)。观察到FCSRT-IR LTR率与双侧CA1体有中度关联(左侧CA1体r = 0.419,p = 0.017;右侧:r = 0.412,p = 0.019),此外还与左侧C3体有关联(r = 0.525,p = 0.002)。
LTR可能构成老年人记忆回路完整性的潜在指标,这也通过其与CA1体积的关联得到反映。因此,评估LTR及相关神经回路可能有助于更好地识别目前与HC难以区分但未来有认知下降风险的个体,最终为早期干预铺平道路。