Suppr超能文献

致编辑的信,关于托梅 - 贝梅霍等人所著的《慢性下腰痛患者的MRI在长达2年的时间里变化有多大?慢性下腰痛患者随访中重复进行MRI真的有必要吗?》(《欧洲脊柱杂志》[2024] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08416-1)

Letter to the editor concerning "How much does an MRI change over a period of up to 2 years in patients with chronic low back pain? Is a repeated MRI really necessary in the follow-up of patients with chronic low back pain?" by Tomé-Bermejo F, et al. (Eur spine J [2024] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08416-1).

作者信息

Feng Zhixiao, Guo Ziyu, Huang Chenyang, Xie Haibo

机构信息

First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09275-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To improve the scientific validity and accuracy of this study.

METHOD

We studied the research methods of the article by carefully reading the article and consulting the relevant literature.

RESULT

The authors questioned the routine use of MRI as a follow-up tool by statistically comparing the degree of change in MRI findings in patients with chronic low back pain over a period of less than or equal to two years.

CONCLUSION

To further enhance the scientific rigor of the study, we suggest that certain aspects could be refined, such as including a more comprehensive discussion of patient characteristics, making adjustments to the time limit for inclusion in the study, and conducting more detailed categorical comparisons of different patient populations before and after.

摘要

目的

提高本研究的科学有效性和准确性。

方法

我们通过仔细阅读文章并查阅相关文献来研究该文章的研究方法。

结果

作者通过对慢性腰痛患者在小于或等于两年的时间段内MRI检查结果变化程度进行统计学比较,对将MRI作为随访工具的常规使用提出了质疑。

结论

为进一步提高研究的科学严谨性,我们建议某些方面可以加以完善,例如更全面地讨论患者特征,调整纳入研究的时间限制,并对不同患者群体前后进行更详细的分类比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验