坐骨神经痛的手术治疗与长期保守治疗对比

Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.

作者信息

Peul Wilco C, van Houwelingen Hans C, van den Hout Wilbert B, Brand Ronald, Eekhof Just A H, Tans Joseph T J, Thomeer Ralph T W M, Koes Bart W

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2245-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar-disk surgery often is performed in patients who have sciatica that does not resolve within 6 weeks, but the optimal timing of surgery is not known.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 283 patients who had had severe sciatica for 6 to 12 weeks to early surgery or to prolonged conservative treatment with surgery if needed. The primary outcomes were the score on the Roland Disability Questionnaire, the score on the visual-analogue scale for leg pain, and the patient's report of perceived recovery during the first year after randomization. Repeated-measures analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle was used to estimate the outcome curves for both groups.

RESULTS

Of 141 patients assigned to undergo early surgery, 125 (89%) underwent microdiskectomy after a mean of 2.2 weeks. Of 142 patients designated for conservative treatment, 55 (39%) were treated surgically after a mean of 18.7 weeks. There was no significant overall difference in disability scores during the first year (P=0.13). Relief of leg pain was faster for patients assigned to early surgery (P<0.001). Patients assigned to early surgery also reported a faster rate of perceived recovery (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.22; P<0.001). In both groups, however, the probability of perceived recovery after 1 year of follow-up was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-year outcomes were similar for patients assigned to early surgery and those assigned to conservative treatment with eventual surgery if needed, but the rates of pain relief and of perceived recovery were faster for those assigned to early surgery. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN26872154 [controlled-trials.com].).

摘要

背景

腰椎间盘手术常用于治疗坐骨神经痛6周内未缓解的患者,但手术的最佳时机尚不清楚。

方法

我们将283例严重坐骨神经痛6至12周的患者随机分为早期手术组或必要时进行长期保守治疗并在需要时手术组。主要结局指标为罗兰残疾问卷评分、腿痛视觉模拟量表评分以及随机分组后第一年患者自我感觉恢复情况报告。根据意向性分析原则采用重复测量分析来估计两组的结局曲线。

结果

141例分配接受早期手术的患者中,125例(89%)平均在2.2周后接受了显微椎间盘切除术。142例指定接受保守治疗的患者中,55例(39%)平均在18.7周后接受了手术治疗。第一年残疾评分无显著总体差异(P = 0.13)。分配到早期手术组的患者腿痛缓解更快(P < 0.001)。分配到早期手术组的患者也报告自我感觉恢复速度更快(风险比,1.97;95%置信区间,1.72至2.22;P < 0.001)。然而,两组随访1年后自我感觉恢复的概率均为95%。

结论

分配到早期手术组的患者与分配到必要时最终进行手术的保守治疗组患者1年结局相似,但早期手术组的疼痛缓解率和自我感觉恢复率更快。(当前对照试验编号,ISRCTN26872154 [controlled-trials.com]。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索