Diaz Miguel A, Daniel Mitch, Sanchez-Urgelles Pablo, Frankle Mark A
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA.
Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida-Health, Tampa, FL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.009.
Baseplate fixation is a crucial step in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and presents a challenge when faced with deformities or glenoid bone loss. Utilization of newer baseplates that are augmented to account for bone loss may provide equivalent stability to standard baseplates without bone loss. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare modern designs by evaluating 3 baseplates: (1) a one-piece monoblock design (RSP), (2) a two-piece nonlocking baseplate (neutral) without bone loss and (3) a two-piece nonlocking design with a wedge augment (wedge) with asymmetric bone loss.
Polyurethane foam block cylinders (n = 6 per group) with a density of 0.48 g/cm were utilized. The 6 foam cylinders for the wedge baseplate were modified to stimulate 50% bone loss and the remaining 12 were left without modification, representing zero bone loss. Samples were mounted into a swing arm attached to the torque motor of a servo-electric test frame equipped with a 5 kN load cell. Samples were cycled through a 55° (from neutral, ±27.5°) arc of motion at 0.5 Hz for 10,000 cycles, while the test frame's actuator applied a constant 750 N compressive. Micromotion (μm) was measured throughout testing.
All samples survived 10,000 cycles of loading without catastrophic failure. None of the constructs exhibited micromotion above the 150 μm threshold. The baseplate micromotions at baseline were observed to be significantly different from one another (P = .001). After 10,000 cycles of loading, similar outcomes were observed where the Neutral had the lowest measured baseplate micromotion compared to RSP and the Wedge. The Wedge baseplate had significantly more micromotion compared to the RSP (P = .0167).
The neutral design was found to be the most stable, followed by the RSP and then the wedge design. All designs evaluated remained below the 150-micron threshold. The two-piece nonlocking wedge baseplate design is a viable option for reverse shoulder arthroplasty when dealing with bone loss.
基板固定是反肩关节置换术中的关键步骤,在面对畸形或关节盂骨缺损时是一项挑战。使用增加了以应对骨缺损的新型基板可能会提供与无骨缺损的标准基板相当的稳定性。这项生物力学研究的目的是通过评估三种基板来比较现代设计:(1)一体式整体设计(RSP),(2)无骨缺损的两件式非锁定基板(中性),以及(3)带有楔形增强物(楔形)的两件式非锁定设计,用于不对称骨缺损。
使用密度为0.48 g/cm的聚氨酯泡沫块圆柱体(每组n = 6)。用于楔形基板的6个泡沫圆柱体被修改以模拟50%的骨缺损,其余12个未作修改,代表零骨缺损。将样本安装到连接到配备5 kN测力传感器的伺服电动测试框架的扭矩电机的摆臂上。样本在0.5 Hz的频率下通过55°(从中性位置,±27.5°)的运动弧循环10,000次,同时测试框架的执行器施加恒定的750 N压缩力。在整个测试过程中测量微动(μm)。
所有样本在10,000次加载循环后均未发生灾难性失效。没有一个结构表现出超过150μm阈值的微动。观察到基线时基板微动彼此有显著差异(P = 0.001)。在10,000次加载循环后,观察到类似的结果,与RSP和楔形相比,中性基板的微动测量值最低。与RSP相比,楔形基板的微动明显更多(P = 0.0167)。
发现中性设计最稳定,其次是RSP,然后是楔形设计。所有评估的设计均保持在150微米阈值以下。两件式非锁定楔形基板设计在处理骨缺损时是反肩关节置换术的一个可行选择。