Zhang Shanshan, Ge Yihao, Bi Zhaodong, Xiao Jiheng, Li Yuqing, Bai Cici, Tian Miao, Li Xiuting, Zhu Yanbin
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the 3rd Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, P. R. China.
Department of Rehabilitation, the 3rd Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, P. R. China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 25;26(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09032-w.
BACKGROUND: A variety of implant devices have been used for treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFF), but the optimal has long been disputed. We aim to summarize the latest evidence for the effectiveness and safety of implants for IFF. METHODS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis included searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2024, for randomized controlled trials of implants in older adult patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Non-English studies, pathological fractures, pathological reports, animal studies, conference abstracts, and incomplete primary were deemed ineligible. We performed frequentist random-effect network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence and applied the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis frameworks to rate the certainty of evidence, calculate the treatment effects, categorize interventions, and present the findings. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD 42,024,562,020. RESULTS: A total of 54 eligible trials were identified, involving 15 implants and enrolling 10,275 participants; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with sliding hip screw (SHS). InterTAN nail (ITN) resulted in the largest reduction in non-mechanical major post-surgery complications (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.91; moderate confidence). No significant differences were found in terms of Harris hip score, reoperation rate, and overall mechanical complications with moderate to low-level evidence. In secondary findings, percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) resulted in the lowest occurrence of non-mechanical minor post-surgery complications (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.30; high confidence), and proximal femoral nail anti-rotating (PFNA) (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.11; high confidence) resulted in most reduced non-specific mechanical complications, respectively and. ITN demonstrated the highest risk of operative issues (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.03 to 5.73; moderate confidence). CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with intertrochanteric fractures, ITN proved among the most effective in reducing non-mechanical major post-surgery complications, but had the highest risk of intraoperative complications. No implants demonstrated superior effectiveness over others. REGISTRATION OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: CRD 42021245678, PROSPERO.
背景:多种植入装置已用于治疗股骨转子间骨折(IFF),但最佳治疗方法长期以来一直存在争议。我们旨在总结关于IFF植入物有效性和安全性的最新证据。 方法:本系统评价和网状Meta分析检索了2000年1月1日至2024年8月31日期间的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,以查找老年股骨转子间骨折患者植入物的随机对照试验。非英文研究、病理性骨折、病理报告、动物研究、会议摘要和不完整的原始研究被视为不合格。我们进行了频率学派随机效应网状Meta分析以总结证据,并应用网状Meta分析的置信度框架对证据的确定性进行评级,计算治疗效果,对干预措施进行分类,并呈现研究结果。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD 42,024,562,020。 结果:共确定了54项符合条件的试验,涉及15种植入物,纳入了10275名参与者;所有后续估计均指与滑动髋螺钉(SHS)的比较。InterTAN钉(ITN)导致术后非机械性主要并发症的减少幅度最大(OR,0.55;95%CI,0.33至0.91;中等置信度)。在Harris髋关节评分、再次手术率和总体机械并发症方面,未发现具有中低水平证据的显著差异。在次要结果中,经皮加压钢板(PCCP)导致术后非机械性次要并发症的发生率最低(OR,0.12;95%CI,0.05至0.30;高置信度),股骨近端抗旋转髓内钉(PFNA)(OR,0.05;95%CI,0.02至0.11;高置信度)分别导致非特异性机械并发症的减少最多。ITN显示出手术问题的风险最高(OR,3.41;95%CI,2.03至5.73;中等置信度)。 结论:在老年股骨转子间骨折患者中,ITN被证明是减少术后非机械性主要并发症最有效的方法之一,但术中并发症的风险最高。没有一种植入物显示出比其他植入物更优越的有效性。 系统评价注册:CRD 42021245678,PROSPERO。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-8-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-1-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-9-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-14
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025-1-20
Age Ageing. 2023-6-1