文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

用于股骨转子间骨折固定的植入物:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析

Implants for fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Zhang Shanshan, Ge Yihao, Bi Zhaodong, Xiao Jiheng, Li Yuqing, Bai Cici, Tian Miao, Li Xiuting, Zhu Yanbin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the 3rd Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, P. R. China.

Department of Rehabilitation, the 3rd Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, P. R. China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 25;26(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09032-w.


DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-09032-w
PMID:40851005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12376464/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of implant devices have been used for treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFF), but the optimal has long been disputed. We aim to summarize the latest evidence for the effectiveness and safety of implants for IFF. METHODS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis included searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2024, for randomized controlled trials of implants in older adult patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Non-English studies, pathological fractures, pathological reports, animal studies, conference abstracts, and incomplete primary were deemed ineligible. We performed frequentist random-effect network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence and applied the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis frameworks to rate the certainty of evidence, calculate the treatment effects, categorize interventions, and present the findings. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD 42,024,562,020. RESULTS: A total of 54 eligible trials were identified, involving 15 implants and enrolling 10,275 participants; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with sliding hip screw (SHS). InterTAN nail (ITN) resulted in the largest reduction in non-mechanical major post-surgery complications (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.91; moderate confidence). No significant differences were found in terms of Harris hip score, reoperation rate, and overall mechanical complications with moderate to low-level evidence. In secondary findings, percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) resulted in the lowest occurrence of non-mechanical minor post-surgery complications (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.30; high confidence), and proximal femoral nail anti-rotating (PFNA) (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.11; high confidence) resulted in most reduced non-specific mechanical complications, respectively and. ITN demonstrated the highest risk of operative issues (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.03 to 5.73; moderate confidence). CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with intertrochanteric fractures, ITN proved among the most effective in reducing non-mechanical major post-surgery complications, but had the highest risk of intraoperative complications. No implants demonstrated superior effectiveness over others. REGISTRATION OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: CRD 42021245678, PROSPERO.

摘要

背景:多种植入装置已用于治疗股骨转子间骨折(IFF),但最佳治疗方法长期以来一直存在争议。我们旨在总结关于IFF植入物有效性和安全性的最新证据。 方法:本系统评价和网状Meta分析检索了2000年1月1日至2024年8月31日期间的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,以查找老年股骨转子间骨折患者植入物的随机对照试验。非英文研究、病理性骨折、病理报告、动物研究、会议摘要和不完整的原始研究被视为不合格。我们进行了频率学派随机效应网状Meta分析以总结证据,并应用网状Meta分析的置信度框架对证据的确定性进行评级,计算治疗效果,对干预措施进行分类,并呈现研究结果。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD 42,024,562,020。 结果:共确定了54项符合条件的试验,涉及15种植入物,纳入了10275名参与者;所有后续估计均指与滑动髋螺钉(SHS)的比较。InterTAN钉(ITN)导致术后非机械性主要并发症的减少幅度最大(OR,0.55;95%CI,0.33至0.91;中等置信度)。在Harris髋关节评分、再次手术率和总体机械并发症方面,未发现具有中低水平证据的显著差异。在次要结果中,经皮加压钢板(PCCP)导致术后非机械性次要并发症的发生率最低(OR,0.12;95%CI,0.05至0.30;高置信度),股骨近端抗旋转髓内钉(PFNA)(OR,0.05;95%CI,0.02至0.11;高置信度)分别导致非特异性机械并发症的减少最多。ITN显示出手术问题的风险最高(OR,3.41;95%CI,2.03至5.73;中等置信度)。 结论:在老年股骨转子间骨折患者中,ITN被证明是减少术后非机械性主要并发症最有效的方法之一,但术中并发症的风险最高。没有一种植入物显示出比其他植入物更优越的有效性。 系统评价注册:CRD 42021245678,PROSPERO。

相似文献

[1]
Implants for fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-8-25

[2]
Optimal surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fracture: a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on 36 randomized controlled trials.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2020-9-10

[3]
Comparative outcome of PFNA, Gamma nails, PCCP, Medoff plate, LISS and dynamic hip screws for fixation in elderly trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017-10

[4]
Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-1-26

[5]
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16

[6]
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-10

[7]
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19

[8]
Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-9-12

[9]
Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-14

[10]
Comparison of a twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN) with a single screw derotation cephalomedullary nail (proximal femoral nail antirotation): a systematic review and meta-analysis for intertrochanteric fractures.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018-3-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly Treated with Different Intramedullary Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Comparison Studies.

JBJS Rev. 2025-3-25

[2]
Harnessing nanotechnology for cancer treatment.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025-1-20

[3]
Author Correction: Randomized trial of influence of vitamin D on the prevention and improvement of symptomatic COVID-19.

Sci Rep. 2024-12-31

[4]
Comparison of postoperative pain between InterTan and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study.

Am J Transl Res. 2024-8-15

[5]
Biomechanical evaluation of Gamma 3 nail with anti-rotation screw fixation for unstable femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study.

Sci Rep. 2024-8-21

[6]
Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus InterTan nail for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2024

[7]
Comparative study of a novel proximal femoral bionic nail and three conventional cephalomedullary nails for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: a finite element analysis.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024-6-13

[8]
Unveiling unique clinical phenotypes of hip fracture patients and the temporal association with cardiovascular events.

Nat Commun. 2024-5-22

[9]
A commentary update on NICE CG124. Hip fracture:management (2023).

Age Ageing. 2023-6-1

[10]
Association of preoperative nutritional status evaluated by the controlling nutritional status score with walking independence at 180 days postoperatively: a prospective cohort study in Chinese older patients with hip fracture.

Int J Surg. 2023-9-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索