Mazza Angela D
Endocrinology, Metabolic Center for Wellness, Oviedo, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 21;17(8):e90685. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90685. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Levothyroxine (T4) monotherapy remains the standard of care for hypothyroidism worldwide. However, a subset of patients continues to report persistent symptoms, such as fatigue, depression, and cognitive difficulties, despite normalized thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. This has reignited clinical interest in the active thyroid hormone triiodothyronine (T3) and combination T4/T3 therapies. This review explores the physiological distinctions between T4 and T3, emphasizing the importance of peripheral T4-to-T3 conversion and the role of deiodinase polymorphisms (e.g., DIO2 Thr92Ala) that may impair this process in certain individuals. The evidence for T3-containing therapies is critically evaluated, including synthetic liothyronine and desiccated thyroid extract, comparing their pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles with T4 monotherapy. Emerging data suggest that some patients may benefit from combination therapy, particularly in symptom resolution and quality-of-life measures, although robust long-term outcomes remain under debate. Current clinical guidelines from major thyroid societies continue to endorse T4 monotherapy, citing inconsistent trial results and potential cardiovascular risks associated with T3. Nonetheless, a growing movement toward personalized medicine, including genetic profiling, patient-reported outcomes, and individualized dosing, may pave the way for more nuanced treatment strategies. This review underscores the need for a balanced, patient-centered approach to thyroid hormone replacement, integrating evolving science with clinical experience to optimize care for individuals with hypothyroidism.
左甲状腺素(T4)单一疗法仍是全球甲状腺功能减退症的标准治疗方法。然而,尽管促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平已恢复正常,但仍有一部分患者持续报告存在疲劳、抑郁和认知困难等症状。这重新引发了临床对活性甲状腺激素三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)以及T4/T3联合疗法的兴趣。本综述探讨了T4和T3之间的生理差异,强调外周T4向T3转化的重要性以及脱碘酶多态性(如DIO2 Thr92Ala)在某些个体中可能损害这一过程的作用。对含T3疗法的证据进行了严格评估,包括合成的碘塞罗宁和干燥甲状腺提取物,将它们的药代动力学、临床结果和安全性与T4单一疗法进行了比较。新出现的数据表明,一些患者可能从联合疗法中获益,尤其是在症状缓解和生活质量方面,尽管强有力的长期结果仍存在争议。主要甲状腺学会的现行临床指南继续支持T4单一疗法,理由是试验结果不一致以及与T3相关的潜在心血管风险。尽管如此,包括基因分析、患者报告结果和个体化给药在内的个性化医疗的发展趋势,可能为更细致入微的治疗策略铺平道路。本综述强调了采取平衡的、以患者为中心的方法进行甲状腺激素替代治疗的必要性,将不断发展的科学与临床经验相结合,以优化对甲状腺功能减退症患者的护理。