Suppr超能文献

甲状腺功能减退症患者的治疗偏好

Treatment Preferences in Patients With Hypothyroidism.

作者信息

de Lima Beltrão Fabyan Esberard, Carvalhal Giulia, de Almeida Beltrão Daniele Carvalhal, de Lima Beltrão Fabricia Elizabeth, Ribeiro Miriam O, Ettleson Matthew D, Ramos Helton Estrela, Bianco Antonio C

机构信息

Lauro Wanderley University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba 58050-585, Brazil.

Department of Internal Medicine, University Centre of João Pessoa (UNIPE), João Pessoa, Paraíba 58053-000, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):887-900. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae651.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Levothyroxine (L-T4) monotherapy is the standard of care for the treatment of hypothyroidism. A minority of L-T4-treated patients remain symptomatic and report better outcomes with combination therapy that contains liothyronine (L-T3) or with desiccated thyroid extract (DTE).

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess patient preferences in the treatment of hypothyroidism.

METHODS

A systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for adults with hypothyroidism (L-T4 vs L-T4 + L-T3 or DTE). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 10, 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by 4 researchers.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (8 cross-over studies) with a total of 1135 patients were considered. Overall, 24% of patients preferred L-T4 vs 52% who preferred L-T4 + L-T3 or DTE; 24% had no preference. The meta-analysis confirmed the preference for combination therapy over L-T4 monotherapy (relative risk [RR]: 2.20; 95% CI, 1.38-3.52; P = .0009). Excluding 4 studies reduced the high heterogeneity (I2 = 81%) without affecting the results (RR: 1.97; 95% CI, 1.52-2.54; P < .00001; I2 = 24%). This preference profile remained when only crossover studies were considered (RR: 2.84; 95% CI, 1.50-5.39; P < .00001). Network meta-analysis confirmed the preference for DTE and L-T3 + L-T4 vs L-T4 alone.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hypothyroidism prefer combination therapy (L-T3 + L-T4 or DTE) over L-T4 monotherapy. The strength of these findings justifies considering patient preferences in the setting of shared decision-making in the treatment of hypothyroidism.

摘要

背景

左甲状腺素(L-T4)单药治疗是甲状腺功能减退症治疗的标准方法。少数接受L-T4治疗的患者仍有症状,且报告称含三碘甲状腺原氨酸(L-T3)的联合治疗或干燥甲状腺提取物(DTE)能带来更好的治疗效果。

目的

本研究旨在评估甲状腺功能减退症治疗中患者的偏好。

方法

对比较成人甲状腺功能减退症治疗方法(L-T4与L-T4 + L-T3或DTE)的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价、荟萃分析、荟萃回归和网状荟萃分析。截至2024年4月10日,在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中进行检索。由4名研究人员独立进行数据提取和质量评估。

结果

共纳入11项RCT(8项交叉研究),总计1135例患者。总体而言,24%的患者更喜欢L-T4,而52%的患者更喜欢L-T4 + L-T3或DTE;24%的患者无偏好。荟萃分析证实,与L-T4单药治疗相比,患者更倾向于联合治疗(相对风险[RR]:2.20;95%置信区间[CI],1.38 - 3.52;P = 0.0009)。排除4项研究可降低高异质性(I² = 81%),且不影响结果(RR:1.97;95% CI,1.52 - 2.54;P < 0.00001;I² = 24%)。仅考虑交叉研究时,这种偏好情况依然存在(RR:2.84;95% CI,1.50 - 5.39;P < 0.00001)。网状荟萃分析证实,与单独使用L-T4相比,患者更喜欢DTE以及L-T3 + L-T4。

结论

甲状腺功能减退症患者更喜欢联合治疗(L-T3 + L-T4或DTE)而非L-T4单药治疗。这些研究结果的力度证明,在甲状腺功能减退症治疗的共同决策过程中,应考虑患者的偏好。

相似文献

1
Treatment Preferences in Patients With Hypothyroidism.甲状腺功能减退症患者的治疗偏好
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):887-900. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae651.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

本文引用的文献

5
T3 levels and thyroid hormone signaling.T3 水平与甲状腺激素信号转导。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 27;13:1044691. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1044691. eCollection 2022.
7
Primary hypothyroidism and quality of life.原发性甲状腺功能减退症与生活质量。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Apr;18(4):230-242. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00625-8. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Brain Fog in Hypothyroidism: Understanding the Patient's Perspective.甲状腺功能减退症中的脑雾:理解患者的视角。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Mar;28(3):257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验