Division of Endocrinology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Section of Adult and Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Thyroid. 2021 Feb;31(2):156-182. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0720.
Fourteen clinical trials have not shown a consistent benefit of combination therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3). Despite the publication of these trials, combination therapy is widely used and patients reporting benefit continue to generate patient and physician interest in this area. Recent scientific developments may provide insight into this inconsistency and guide future studies. The American Thyroid Association (ATA), British Thyroid Association (BTA), and European Thyroid Association (ETA) held a joint conference on November 3, 2019 (live-streamed between Chicago and London) to review new basic science and clinical evidence regarding combination therapy with presentations and input from 12 content experts. After the presentations, the material was synthesized and used to develop Summary Statements of the current state of knowledge. After review and revision of the material and Summary Statements, there was agreement that there was equipoise for a new clinical trial of combination therapy. Consensus Statements encapsulating the implications of the material discussed with respect to the design of future clinical trials of LT4/LT3 combination therapy were generated. Authors voted upon the Consensus Statements. Iterative changes were made in several rounds of voting and after comments from ATA/BTA/ETA members. Of 34 Consensus Statements available for voting, 28 received at least 75% agreement, with 13 receiving 100% agreement. Those with 100% agreement included studies being powered to study the effect of deiodinase and thyroid hormone transporter polymorphisms on study outcomes, inclusion of patients dissatisfied with their current therapy and requiring at least 1.2 μg/kg of LT4 daily, use of twice daily LT3 or preferably a slow-release preparation if available, use of patient-reported outcomes as a primary outcome (measured by a tool with both relevant content validity and responsiveness) and patient preference as a secondary outcome, and utilization of a randomized placebo-controlled adequately powered double-blinded parallel design. The remaining statements are presented as potential additional considerations. This article summarizes the areas discussed and presents Consensus Statements to guide development of future clinical trials of LT4/LT3 combination therapy. The results of such redesigned trials are expected to be of benefit to patients and of value to inform future thyroid hormone replacement clinical practice guidelines treatment recommendations.
十四项临床试验并未显示左甲状腺素(LT4)和三碘甲状腺原氨酸(LT3)联合治疗的一致益处。尽管这些试验已经发表,但联合治疗仍被广泛应用,并且报告受益的患者继续引起患者和医生对这一领域的兴趣。最近的科学发展可能为这种不一致提供了一些见解,并为未来的研究提供了指导。
美国甲状腺协会(ATA)、英国甲状腺协会(BTA)和欧洲甲状腺协会(ETA)于 2019 年 11 月 3 日(在芝加哥和伦敦之间进行了现场直播)举行了一次联合会议,审查了关于联合治疗的新基础科学和临床证据,由 12 名内容专家进行了演讲和介绍。在演讲之后,对材料进行了综合,并用于制定当前知识状况的摘要陈述。在对材料和摘要陈述进行审查和修订后,一致认为需要进行新的联合治疗临床试验。生成了包含与未来 LT4/LT3 联合治疗临床试验设计相关的讨论材料的共识陈述。作者对共识陈述进行了投票。在几轮投票和 ATA/BTA/ETA 成员的评论后,对 34 项共识陈述进行了修改。
可投票的 34 项共识陈述中,有 28 项获得了至少 75%的同意,其中 13 项获得了 100%的同意。获得 100%同意的包括研究旨在研究脱碘酶和甲状腺激素转运蛋白多态性对研究结果的影响、纳入对当前治疗不满意且需要每天至少 1.2μg/kg LT4 的患者、每日两次 LT3 或最好使用如果有可用的缓释制剂、使用患者报告的结果作为主要结果(通过具有相关内容有效性和反应性的工具进行测量)和次要结果为患者偏好,以及使用随机安慰剂对照充分有力的双盲平行设计。其余陈述则作为潜在的附加考虑因素呈现。
本文总结了讨论的领域,并提出了共识陈述,以指导 LT4/LT3 联合治疗的未来临床试验的开展。此类重新设计的试验的结果有望使患者受益,并为未来的甲状腺激素替代临床实践指南治疗建议提供信息。