Suppr超能文献

患者参与出版物:制药行业当前情况的定性映射

Patient involvement in publications: qualitative mapping of the current landscape within the pharmaceutical industry.

作者信息

Rosenberg Adeline, Clark Liz, McClelland Graham R

机构信息

Centre for Pharmaceutical Medicine Research, King's College London, London, UK.

Patient Engagement, Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Aug;41(8):1475-1489. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2545496. Epub 2025 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient involvement in pharmaceutical industry-sponsored publications is a rapidly evolving practice. It is supported by industry guidelines, but currently inconsistent across organizations. This study aimed to qualitatively map the landscape of current practices and gaps in patient involvement in peer-reviewed journal publications of pharmaceutical industry-sponsored research, and to define the specific roles and activities in which patients are involved.

METHODS

This qualitative, patient-led study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled experts in patient engagement and publications, including patients. Interviews were conducted online, transcribed, and thematically analysed. Landscape elements were visually mapped, and themes were generated through an inductive and experientially situated thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 20 participants recruited globally, with a majority from the United Kingdom. Participants represented diverse stakeholder categories and reported patient involvement across all stages and aspects of the publication lifecycle, with patients both as external consultants and as professionals working within the system. Five overarching themes and 20 sub-themes were identified, including: patient identities and roles; principles and values; processes and practices; variations over time and across organizations; and impact. Significant gaps were identified in consistency, quality, and scale, for example including gaps in infrastructure barriers and diversity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient involvement in pharmaceutical publications is actively happening across the publication lifecycle and is rapidly growing and evolving. This study provides an evidence base a qualitative mapping of the experiential landscape and highlights the need for established best practices to support consistency and quality in meaningful patient involvement in publications.

摘要

目的

患者参与制药行业资助的出版物是一种迅速发展的做法。它得到了行业指南的支持,但目前各组织之间并不一致。本研究旨在定性描绘制药行业资助研究的同行评审期刊出版物中患者参与的当前实践情况和差距,并确定患者所参与的具体角色和活动。

方法

这项由患者主导的定性研究采用了半结构化访谈,对象是有目的地抽取的患者参与和出版物方面的专家,包括患者。访谈通过在线方式进行,进行转录并进行主题分析。对相关要素进行可视化映射,并通过归纳性和基于经验的主题分析生成主题。

结果

对全球招募的20名参与者进行了访谈,其中大多数来自英国。参与者代表了不同的利益相关者类别,并报告了患者在出版物生命周期的所有阶段和方面都有参与,患者既作为外部顾问,也作为系统内工作的专业人员。确定了五个总体主题和20个子主题,包括:患者身份和角色;原则和价值观;流程和实践;不同时间和不同组织的差异;以及影响。在一致性、质量和规模方面发现了重大差距,例如在基础设施障碍和多样性方面的差距。

结论

患者在制药出版物中的参与在出版物生命周期中积极发生,并且正在迅速增长和演变。本研究提供了一个证据基础——对经验情况的定性映射,并强调需要既定的最佳实践来支持有意义的患者参与出版物的一致性和质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验