随机临床试验中的非癌症相关死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Noncancer-Related Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis.
作者信息
Lei Jiayao, Deng Yunyang, Clements Mark, Duffy Stephen, Sasieni Peter
机构信息
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
出版信息
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526990. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26990.
IMPORTANCE
Cancer screening is a critical tool in cancer control, reducing cancer-specific mortality. However, it also has potential harms, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Measuring the effect of screening based on all-cause mortality is insensitive to both benefits and harms and requires substantially large sample sizes. Understanding the impact of screening on noncancer-related (off-target) mortality is essential for evaluating its overall benefit.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the association between cancer screening and off-target mortality by comparing mortality rates between screened and unscreened populations based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES
The analysis examined all RCTs included in a previously published (August 28, 2023) meta-analysis of cancer screening trials that included the end point of all-cause mortality in addition to targeted cancer mortality.
STUDY SELECTION
All RCTs included in the previous meta-analysis were included. The latest search in that meta analysis was conducted on October 12, 2022, with no language or publication date restrictions.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The study followed relevant portions of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Two authors independently extracted data, and a third author verified those data. Off-target mortality was analyzed using rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs via a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was off-target mortality, defined as deaths with a cause that was not the targeted cancer.
RESULTS
A total of 17 RCTs (8 of colorectal, 3 prostate, 3 lung, 2 breast, and 1 multiple cancers) including 1 305 924 participants with 18 508 192 person-years of follow-up were included. Screening did not significantly increase off-target mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01); the overall increase in off-target mortality was 0.2% (95% CI, -0.5% to 0.9%). There was no evidence of heterogeneity between trials (I2 = 0.00%; Cochran Q = 14.96, df = 18; P = .66). The trial-specific RRs ranged from 0.89 (95% CI, 0.69-1.15) to 1.09 (95% CI, 0.98-1.22), with all 95% CIs including 1. Targeted cancer deaths accounted for 2.6% to 33.1% of all deaths, depending on the cancer type.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings show that randomization to cancer screening was not associated with more than a very small increase in noncancer-related mortality, with the 95% CI excluding an increase of greater than 1%. The findings emphasize the importance of evaluating targeted and off-target mortality separately rather than relying solely on all-cause mortality.
重要性
癌症筛查是癌症控制的关键手段,可降低癌症特异性死亡率。然而,它也存在潜在危害,包括过度诊断和过度治疗。基于全因死亡率衡量筛查效果对益处和危害均不敏感,且需要极大的样本量。了解筛查对非癌症相关(非靶向)死亡率的影响对于评估其总体益处至关重要。
目的
通过基于随机临床试验(RCT)比较筛查人群和未筛查人群的死亡率,评估癌症筛查与非靶向死亡率之间的关联。
数据来源
该分析审查了先前发表的(2023年8月28日)癌症筛查试验荟萃分析中纳入的所有RCT,这些试验除了靶向癌症死亡率外还包括全因死亡率终点。
研究选择
纳入先前荟萃分析中的所有RCT。该荟萃分析的最新检索于2022年10月12日进行,无语言或出版日期限制。
数据提取与合成
该研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南的相关部分。两位作者独立提取数据,第三位作者核实这些数据。通过固定效应模型使用率比(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)分析非靶向死亡率。使用I²统计量评估异质性。
主要结局与指标
主要结局为非靶向死亡率,定义为死因不是靶向癌症的死亡。
结果
共纳入17项RCT(8项结直肠癌、3项前列腺癌、3项肺癌、2项乳腺癌和1项多种癌症),包括1305,924名参与者,随访18,508,192人年。筛查未显著增加非靶向死亡率(RR,1.00;95%CI,1.00 - 1.01);非靶向死亡率的总体增加为0.2%(95%CI,-0.5%至0.9%)。试验之间没有异质性证据(I² = 0.00%;Cochran Q = 14.96,自由度 = 18;P = 0.66)。特定试验的RRs范围为0.89(95%CI,0.69 - 1.15)至1.09(95%CI,0.98 - 1.22),所有95%CI均包含1。根据癌症类型,靶向癌症死亡占所有死亡的2.6%至33.1%。
结论与意义
这些发现表明,随机接受癌症筛查与非癌症相关死亡率的极小增加无关,95%CI排除了大于1%的增加。这些发现强调了分别评估靶向和非靶向死亡率而非仅依赖全因死亡率的重要性。